AQA GCSE English Literature: Modern Drama Revision Guide -- A Taste of Honey, Blood Brothers and DNA
AQA GCSE English Literature: Modern Drama Revision Guide -- A Taste of Honey, Blood Brothers and DNA
The modern drama section of AQA GCSE English Literature (Paper 2, Section A) asks you to write about one set text in detail. Three of the most popular choices are A Taste of Honey by Shelagh Delaney, Blood Brothers by Willy Russell, and DNA by Dennis Kelly. Each play explores social issues through distinctive dramatic techniques, and each rewards students who understand context, character, and the writer's methods.
This guide covers all three texts -- themes, characters, key quotations, and the exam skills you need to reach the top bands.
A Taste of Honey by Shelagh Delaney
Context
A Taste of Honey was first performed in 1958, written by Shelagh Delaney when she was just eighteen years old. Set in a run-down flat in Salford, it belongs to the kitchen sink realism movement -- a style of drama that rejected polished, middle-class drawing-room plays in favour of honest, gritty depictions of working-class life. The fact that Delaney was a young, working-class woman is significant. She brought an authentic voice to a theatre landscape dominated by older, middle-class male playwrights. She wrote characters who were rarely seen on stage: a semi-alcoholic mother, her mixed-race pregnant daughter, a gay man offering domestic care. These were radical representations for the 1950s.
The social context of post-war Salford -- poverty, poor housing, racial prejudice, limited opportunities for women -- runs through every scene. Delaney does not sentimentalise poverty or moralise about it. She simply shows it.
Key Characters
Jo is a sharp, independent teenager whose sarcasm masks real vulnerability. She craves stability but struggles to trust anyone, having been let down repeatedly by her mother. Her pregnancy and attempts to build a life on her own terms drive the second half of the play.
Helen is Jo's mother -- chaotic, self-centred, and frequently drunk, but also funny and occasionally tender. The mother-daughter relationship is the emotional core of the play. Helen abandons Jo to marry Peter but returns when she learns Jo is pregnant, reasserting control just when Jo has begun to find independence.
Peter is Helen's new husband, a brash younger man with money who represents Helen's desire to escape poverty.
Jimmy (the Boy) is a Black sailor who has a brief relationship with Jo before leaving for sea duty. Jo's unborn mixed-race child becomes a source of tension when Helen discovers the truth, exposing the racial prejudice of the era.
Geof is a gentle art student, implied to be gay, who moves in with Jo and looks after her during her pregnancy. He offers Jo the most stable relationship in the play but is pushed out when Helen returns.
Key Themes
Class and poverty shape every aspect of the characters' lives. The cramped flat, Helen's drinking, Jo's limited options -- Delaney shows how poverty restricts choices without reducing her characters to victims.
Motherhood and family is explored through the dysfunctional relationship between Jo and Helen. Neither conforms to idealised notions of motherhood. Helen is neglectful; Jo is anxious about becoming a mother herself. Delaney challenges the assumption that maternal love is automatic or sufficient.
Race and prejudice surface through Jo's relationship with Jimmy and the prospect of her mixed-race child. Helen's hostile reaction reveals casual racism, while Jo's own attitude is more complex and conflicted.
Gender and independence are central to Jo's story. She tries to live on her own terms in a society that offers working-class women very few options. Her independence is fragile -- constantly threatened by poverty, pregnancy, and Helen's interference.
Growing up is the play's underlying arc. Jo is forced into adulthood by circumstances, not by choice. The "taste of honey" of the title suggests a brief sweetness -- her time with Jimmy, her domestic life with Geof -- that does not last.
Key Quotations
- "We're unique!" (Jo) -- Jo's defiant assertion of individuality in the face of a society that dismisses people like her.
- "You're nothing to me. I can get by without you." (Jo to Helen) -- Reveals Jo's desire for independence but also her pain at Helen's neglect.
- "I'm not just one of those little women who stays at home." (Helen) -- Helen's self-image clashes with the limited role society gives her.
- "I'd sooner be dead than away from you." (Geof to Jo) -- Geof's sincere devotion, contrasting with the instability of Jo's other relationships.
Blood Brothers by Willy Russell
Context
Blood Brothers was first performed in 1983. It tells the story of twin brothers separated at birth -- Mickey grows up in poverty with his biological mother, Mrs Johnstone, while Eddie is raised in wealth by Mrs Lyons. Russell grew up in working-class Liverpool and Blood Brothers is his most sustained exploration of how class determines opportunity.
The play uses Brechtian techniques -- direct address to the audience, a Narrator who breaks the fourth wall, and songs that comment on the action. Russell wants you to think about why things happen, not just feel sad that they do. The musical elements make the story emotionally engaging while creating an almost folk-ballad quality, as though the twins' fate is the stuff of legend.
Key Characters
Mickey grows up in poverty. As a child he is energetic and lovable, but as an adult his prospects narrow: unemployment, depression, imprisonment. His trajectory illustrates Russell's argument that class determines destiny.
Eddie grows up in wealth. He is confident and well-educated -- not because he is naturally superior to Mickey, but because his environment gave him advantages. His privilege is the counterpoint to Mickey's decline.
Mrs Johnstone is the twins' biological mother -- warm, impulsive, and superstitious. Pressured by poverty and overwhelmed with children, she gives Eddie away in a moment of desperation. Russell makes clear that her decision is the product of an impossible situation, not a moral failing.
Mrs Lyons is Eddie's adoptive mother -- middle-class, anxious, and manipulative. She pressures Mrs Johnstone into giving up the baby, then uses superstition to keep the secret. As the play progresses, her fear of losing Eddie makes her increasingly unstable, and she ultimately reveals the truth.
Linda is Mickey's childhood sweetheart and later his wife. Her affair with Eddie near the end becomes the trigger for the final tragedy.
The Narrator opens the play by revealing the ending -- the twins will die -- then guides the audience through the story. His role is partly Brechtian (reminding us we are watching a construction) and partly symbolic (evoking fate and judgement). The dramatic irony means the audience watches every happy childhood scene knowing where it leads.
Key Themes
Class and social inequality is the play's driving force. Russell presents the twins as a controlled experiment: same genetics, different environments. Mickey's decline and Eddie's success result not from individual talent but from the resources their respective classes provide.
Nature vs nurture is explored through the twins themselves. They share the same DNA but develop into very different people. Russell's answer is clear -- nurture wins.
Fate and superstition run through the play. Both mothers believe the superstition about the twins, and the Narrator reinforces inevitability. But Russell complicates the idea: is the tragedy really destiny, or is it the inevitable result of a deeply unequal society?
Friendship and brotherhood -- Mickey and Eddie's childhood friendship crosses class lines effortlessly, but as they grow up, class pulls them apart. The innocence of childhood cannot survive an unequal adult world.
Violence erupts at the climax but has been building throughout. Russell connects violence to desperation and powerlessness -- Mickey becomes violent because society has stripped him of everything else.
Key Quotations
- "If either twin learns he was one of a pair, they shall both immediately die." (Mrs Lyons) -- The superstition that drives the plot and raises questions about fate versus social causation.
- "Give one to me, Mrs Johnstone. One of them. Give one to me." (Mrs Lyons) -- Reveals her desperation and sets the tragedy in motion.
- "I could have been him!" (Mickey) -- Mickey does not mourn losing a brother -- he mourns losing a life. Russell's argument distilled into a single line.
- "Do we blame superstition for what came to pass? Or could it be what we, the English, have come to know as class?" (Narrator) -- The play's central question, posed directly to the audience.
DNA by Dennis Kelly
Context
DNA was first performed in 2008 as part of the National Theatre's programme for young audiences. It is a short, intense play about a group of teenagers who accidentally cause the death (or apparent death) of a boy called Adam, and the increasingly disturbing decisions they make to cover it up. Kelly explores how ordinary people -- in this case, teenagers -- can become capable of terrible things when group pressure replaces individual conscience.
Key Characters
Phil is largely silent, often eating while others panic. But when he speaks, his plans are coldly efficient. He engineers the cover-up, frames an innocent man, and ultimately arranges for Adam (who turns out to be alive) to be hidden permanently. Phil's silence is not passivity -- it is control.
Leah talks almost constantly, delivering monologues about morality and identity while Phil ignores her. She has the clearest moral awareness of any character, but her awareness does not translate into action. Her eventual departure is an act of defeat, not defiance.
John Tate is the group's initial leader, maintaining control through intimidation and banning the word "dead." His authority is fragile, and Phil's quiet competence quickly displaces him. He later disappears, reported to have "found God."
Cathy is cheerful and enthusiastic about the crisis in a way that is deeply unsettling. She volunteers eagerly for tasks, including violent ones, and shows no moral discomfort.
Richard is visibly uneasy throughout and reports on events between scenes. By the final act, he has taken Leah's position -- sitting with Phil, talking into the same silence -- suggesting a bleak cycle.
Jan and Mark function as a pair, finishing each other's sentences. They represent the ordinary group members who go along with events.
Adam is the victim, bullied by the group before the play begins. His "death" triggers the cover-up; when found alive, Phil decides he must be kept hidden permanently.
Danny uses his forensic-science knowledge to help Phil construct the cover-up, representing how technical skill can serve immoral ends.
Key Themes
Bullying and peer pressure are the starting point. Adam was bullied before the play begins. The group's response to the crisis is shaped by peer dynamics -- individuals suppress their doubts because the group expects compliance.
Guilt and responsibility affect characters differently. Leah is consumed by guilt; Phil appears to feel none; Cathy is indifferent; John Tate cannot cope. Kelly shows that guilt alone is not enough -- without the courage to act on it, moral awareness changes nothing.
Leadership and power shift throughout the play. John Tate's authoritarian bluster gives way to Phil's quiet, strategic control. Kelly suggests that in a moral vacuum, the most ruthless person takes charge because others are too afraid to resist.
Morality is tested at every stage. Each new decision -- framing an innocent man, hiding Adam when he reappears -- takes the group further from any moral baseline. Kelly shows morality eroding incrementally, not collapsing in a single moment.
Identity is explored through Leah's monologues, which question what makes us human. The group's behaviour suggests that identity is not fixed but shaped by circumstance and pressure.
The Play's Structure
DNA is structured in four acts, each preceded by a scene between Leah and Phil. These framing scenes chart the deterioration of their relationship and the group's moral collapse. In the early scenes, Leah talks and Phil eats, ignoring her. By the final scene, Leah has gone and Richard has taken her place, talking into the same silence. The cyclical structure suggests nothing has been resolved.
Key Quotations
- "What are you going to do, Phil?" (Leah) -- Repeated throughout, marking the moment leadership passes to Phil.
- "I'm not going to say that word." (John Tate, referring to "dead") -- Shows John Tate's fragile control and his attempt to deny reality through language.
- "We've found a man, a living rough man, and we've got his DNA on the jumper." (Phil) -- The chilling moment Phil's plan to frame an innocent person becomes clear.
- "You don't have to do this." (Leah to Phil) -- Leah's moral objection, which Phil ignores. Knowing something is wrong is not the same as stopping it.
- "He's happy. He doesn't want to come back." (Phil, about Adam) -- Phil's justification for keeping Adam hidden, a lie that the group accepts because the alternative is too difficult.
AQA Exam Technique: Paper 2, Section A
The modern drama question on Paper 2 is extract-based. You will be given a short extract from your set text and a question that asks you to write about a theme or character, with reference to the extract and the play as a whole. You typically have around 45 to 50 minutes for this question.
How to Structure Your Response
Start with the extract. Analyse specific words and phrases closely, explaining how the writer uses language, form, and structure to create meaning. Then move outward to the play as a whole, discussing how the theme or character develops across the text and what the playwright's intentions are. A strong response spends roughly half its time on the extract and half on the wider play. Do not retell the plot -- focus on analysis and the writer's methods.
Assessment Objectives
The question tests AO1 (informed personal response using textual references), AO2 (analysis of language, form, and structure), AO3 (understanding of contexts), and AO4 (accurate writing). AO2 and AO3 often distinguish good responses from excellent ones. For AO2, always ask: why has the writer made this choice? For AO3, weave context into your argument rather than bolting it on as a separate paragraph.
Practical Tips
- Use short, embedded quotations rather than long block quotes. A few well-chosen words, analysed closely, are far more effective than copying out whole speeches.
- Refer to the writer by name. Say "Delaney presents Jo as..." or "Russell uses the Narrator to..." -- this keeps the focus on the text as a construction.
- Address the question directly. Every paragraph should connect back to the specific terms of the question.
- Plan before you write. Two or three minutes of planning will make your response more focused and coherent.
Prepare with LearningBro
LearningBro offers dedicated courses for each of these modern drama texts, with exam-style questions and detailed explanations.
Each course is designed to build your confidence and prepare you for the AQA exam.
Good luck with your revision.