You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The Keynesian Aggregate Supply curve is a distinctive feature of Keynesian macroeconomics. Unlike the classical vertical LRAS, the Keynesian AS curve has three distinct sections, each with different implications for the effectiveness of demand management policy. Understanding this curve is essential for analysing output gaps, the impact of fiscal and monetary policy, and the debate between Keynesian and classical economists.
The Keynesian AS curve reflects the idea that the economy's response to increases in aggregate demand depends on how close the economy is to full capacity:
| Feature | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Shape | Flat/horizontal |
| Economic conditions | Significant spare capacity — high unemployment, idle factories, unused capital |
| Response to AD increase | Output increases with no increase in the price level |
| Why? | Firms can hire unemployed workers at the prevailing wage rate. There is no upward pressure on wages or prices because resources are abundant and easily available. |
| Policy implication | Demand management is highly effective — an increase in G or a cut in interest rates translates fully into higher output and employment, with no inflation |
This section represents the economy in deep recession — the situation Keynes was analysing during the Great Depression of the 1930s, when unemployment in the UK reached over 20%.
Exam Tip: The horizontal section is the strongest case for Keynesian demand management. In this zone, increasing AD raises output and employment without causing inflation. This is the theoretical justification for expansionary fiscal policy during recessions.
| Feature | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Shape | Upward-sloping |
| Economic conditions | The economy is approaching full capacity — some sectors and regions have spare capacity while others are experiencing bottlenecks |
| Response to AD increase | Output increases but the price level also rises |
| Why? | As the economy approaches full employment, some factor markets become tight. Skilled workers may command higher wages. Firms face rising marginal costs as they push towards capacity. Some industries hit supply constraints before others. |
| Policy implication | Demand management still increases output, but at the cost of some inflation — there is a trade-off |
This section represents the economy in normal times — neither deep recession nor full boom. Most real-world economies operate somewhere along this section.
As AD increases along the upward-sloping section, bottleneck inflation occurs because:
| Feature | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Shape | Vertical |
| Economic conditions | Full employment — all factors of production are fully utilised |
| Response to AD increase | The price level rises with no increase in real output |
| Why? | The economy cannot produce more because all resources are employed. Extra spending simply bids up the prices of existing output. |
| Policy implication | Demand management is completely ineffective at increasing output — it only causes inflation. Only supply-side policies can increase output by shifting AS to the right. |
At this point, the Keynesian and classical views converge — both agree that at full employment, increases in AD are purely inflationary.
The output gap is the difference between the economy's actual output and its potential (full employment) output:
| Type of Gap | Definition | Location on Keynesian AS |
|---|---|---|
| Negative output gap (deflationary gap) | Actual output < potential output | Economy is on the horizontal or early upward-sloping section |
| Positive output gap (inflationary gap) | Actual output > sustainable potential output | Economy is beyond full employment — unsustainable overheating |
| Zero output gap | Actual output = potential output | Economy is at full employment |
| Period | Estimated Output Gap | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Approximately −6% | Deep recession following the financial crisis |
| 2012–2013 | Approximately −2 to −3% | Slow recovery, austerity |
| 2019 | Approximately 0% | Near full employment |
| 2020 Q2 | Approximately −25% | COVID lockdown — the largest output gap in modern history |
| 2022 | Approximately +1% | Post-COVID recovery, tight labour market |
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.