You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Taxation is the primary means by which governments raise revenue to fund public services and redistribute income. For A-Level Economics, you need to understand the different types of tax, the distinction between progressive, regressive, and proportional systems, the economic effects of taxation, and the theoretical framework provided by the Laffer curve.
Key Definition: A tax is a compulsory levy imposed by the government on individuals or firms. It transfers purchasing power from the private sector to the public sector.
| Feature | Direct Taxes | Indirect Taxes |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Levied on income, profits, or wealth | Levied on spending on goods and services |
| Examples | Income tax, corporation tax, capital gains tax, inheritance tax, National Insurance | VAT, excise duties (fuel, alcohol, tobacco), customs duties, air passenger duty |
| Who pays? | The person or firm on whom the tax is levied | The consumer (though the incidence may be shared with producers) |
| Avoidability | Cannot easily be avoided (mandatory on earned income) | Can be partially avoided by changing spending patterns |
| Administrative cost | Relatively high (PAYE system, self-assessment) | Relatively low (collected by businesses at point of sale) |
The incidence of a tax refers to who ultimately bears the burden. With indirect taxes, the incidence depends on the price elasticity of demand and supply.
Exam Tip: When discussing indirect taxes, always consider the elasticity of demand. A tax on cigarettes (PED inelastic) raises significant revenue and is largely borne by consumers. A tax on luxury yachts (PED elastic) may raise little revenue as consumers switch to alternatives.
A progressive tax takes a larger proportion of income from higher earners than from lower earners. The UK income tax system is progressive:
| Band (2023-24) | Taxable Income | Rate |
|---|---|---|
| Personal allowance | Up to £12,570 | 0% |
| Basic rate | £12,571 – £50,270 | 20% |
| Higher rate | £50,271 – £125,140 | 40% |
| Additional rate | Over £125,140 | 45% |
A person earning £100,000 pays a higher proportion of their income in tax than a person earning £20,000. This is because the marginal rate of tax increases with income.
Advantages: Reduces income inequality; based on ability to pay; raises more revenue from those who can afford it.
Disadvantages: May create disincentive effects at high marginal rates; can lead to tax avoidance and evasion; may discourage entrepreneurship and risk-taking.
A regressive tax takes a larger proportion of income from lower earners than from higher earners, even if the absolute amount paid is the same or less. VAT is regressive in practice because lower-income households spend a higher proportion of their income on consumption, while higher-income households save a larger share.
Example: A flat-rate VAT of 20% on a £100 purchase costs £20 regardless of income. For someone earning £15,000, this represents 0.13% of their annual income. For someone earning £150,000, it represents only 0.013%.
Exam Tip: Be precise: regressive does not mean the poor pay more in absolute terms — it means they pay a higher proportion of their income. This is a common error in exam answers.
A proportional (or flat) tax takes the same proportion of income from all earners, regardless of income level. A flat income tax rate of 20% on all income would be proportional. Few taxes are perfectly proportional in practice, though some countries (e.g., Estonia, with a 20% flat income tax) have adopted systems that approximate this.
| Tax Type | Proportion Paid by Low Earners | Proportion Paid by High Earners | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Progressive | Lower | Higher | UK income tax |
| Regressive | Higher | Lower | VAT, excise duties |
| Proportional | Same | Same | Flat tax (theoretical) |
In The Wealth of Nations (1776), Adam Smith set out four principles — or canons — that a good tax system should follow. These remain influential in evaluating modern tax policy.
Taxes should be levied according to ability to pay. Those with higher incomes should pay proportionally more. This principle underpins the case for progressive taxation.
The amount, timing, and method of payment should be clear and predictable to the taxpayer. Uncertainty creates anxiety and enables corruption. Modern PAYE systems largely satisfy this canon.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.