You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Governments use a range of fiscal, labour market, and social policies to reduce inequality and poverty. This lesson examines the main policy tools available, evaluates their effectiveness using UK evidence, and considers the trade-offs involved. Understanding these policies — and being able to evaluate them critically — is essential for A-Level Economics.
Key Definition: A progressive tax is one where the proportion of income paid in tax rises as income rises. The marginal tax rate exceeds the average tax rate.
UK Income Tax Rates (2024/25):
| Band | Taxable Income | Rate |
|---|---|---|
| Personal Allowance | Up to £12,570 | 0% |
| Basic Rate | £12,571 – £50,270 | 20% |
| Higher Rate | £50,271 – £125,140 | 40% |
| Additional Rate | Over £125,140 | 45% |
Income tax is clearly progressive — a worker earning £20,000 pays approximately 5% of their total income in income tax, while a worker earning £200,000 pays approximately 35%.
National Insurance Contributions (NICs) are less clearly progressive. Employee NICs are charged at 8% on earnings between £12,570 and £50,270, and 2% above that — making them regressive at higher incomes (the marginal rate falls as income rises).
Key Definition: A regressive tax is one where the proportion of income paid in tax falls as income rises, even if the absolute amount paid rises.
Value Added Tax (VAT) at 20% is regressive because lower-income households spend a higher proportion of their income on consumption (and therefore on VAT). The IFS estimates that the poorest fifth of households pay approximately 27% of their disposable income in indirect taxes, compared with approximately 14% for the richest fifth.
| Tax | Progressive or Regressive? |
|---|---|
| Income tax | Progressive |
| NICs | Regressive at high incomes |
| Capital gains tax (CGT) | Regressive (lower rates than income tax; mainly paid by the wealthy) |
| Council tax | Regressive (based on 1991 property valuations; does not scale with current values) |
| VAT | Regressive |
| Inheritance tax (IHT) | Progressive (40% above £325,000 threshold; but extensive avoidance) |
The overall UK tax system is only mildly progressive — the impact of regressive indirect taxes partly offsets the progressivity of income tax. The ONS estimates that the tax and benefit system combined reduces the Gini coefficient by approximately 18 percentage points (from 0.49 for original income to 0.31 for post-tax income).
Exam Tip: Do not simply state that "the UK has a progressive tax system." A more accurate and higher-scoring statement is: "The UK income tax system is progressive, but the overall tax system is only mildly progressive because of regressive elements such as VAT, council tax, and the structure of NICs."
| Type | Description | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Means-tested | Eligibility depends on income and assets | Universal Credit, Housing Benefit, Pension Credit |
| Universal | Available to all who meet non-income criteria | Child Benefit (though taxed back above £50,000), State Pension |
| Contributory | Based on National Insurance contribution record | Jobseeker's Allowance (contributory), Statutory Sick Pay |
Universal Credit (UC) was introduced from 2013 to replace six previous "legacy benefits" (Income Support, income-based JSA, income-related ESA, Housing Benefit, Child Tax Credit, and Working Tax Credit) into a single monthly payment.
Key features:
Evaluation of Universal Credit:
| Advantage | Disadvantage |
|---|---|
| Simplifies a complex benefits system | The five-week wait for first payment pushes claimants into debt and destitution (Trussell Trust: 3 million emergency food parcels in 2022/23) |
| Single taper rate reduces high marginal deduction rates | 55% taper + income tax + NICs means some workers face effective marginal tax rates of 70%+ |
| Work allowances encourage employment | Monthly payment is difficult for those used to weekly budgets |
| Automatic adjustments reduce fraud and error | Digital-only application excludes those without internet access or digital literacy |
| In-work conditionality can encourage progression | Sanctions regime criticised as punitive — removing benefits for minor infractions |
Key Definition: The poverty trap (or unemployment trap) occurs when the combined withdrawal of benefits and imposition of taxes means that a worker gains little or no net income from working additional hours or from moving into employment.
The marginal deduction rate (MDR) measures the percentage of each additional £1 earned that is lost to taxation and benefit withdrawal:
MDR = (Tax paid + Benefits lost) / Increase in gross income × 100
Before Universal Credit, some families faced MDRs of over 90% — earning an extra £1 left them with less than 10p. UC has reduced this, but MDRs of 70–75% remain common for many low-income workers with children.
The principle of in-work benefits — supplementing low wages with state payments — was pioneered by Gordon Brown as Chancellor through the introduction of Working Families Tax Credit (1999) and later Working Tax Credit and Child Tax Credit (2003), now being replaced by Universal Credit.
Arguments for in-work benefits:
Arguments against:
As discussed in Lesson 6, the NMW/NLW directly raises the wages of the lowest-paid workers. Its impact on inequality depends on:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.