Revision Strategies and Exam Technique

This final lesson focuses on how to revise effectively for AQA A-Level English Language (7702) and how to apply strong exam technique on the day. The content of Papers 1 and 2 has been covered in the preceding lessons; this lesson is about the process of revision itself, and the practical strategies that will help you perform at your best under timed conditions.

---

Revising Linguistic Terminology

One of the biggest challenges in A-Level English Language is the sheer volume of terminology you need to command. Unlike subjects where you can learn facts and reproduce them, English Language requires you to deploy terminology flexibly in response to unseen texts. This means your revision must focus on understanding and application, not just memorisation.

Strategy 1: Terminology Flashcards

Create a set of flashcards with the linguistic term on one side and the following information on the other:

• Definition — a clear, concise definition in your own words.
• Example — a concrete example of the feature in use.
• Effect — how the feature typically contributes to meaning (e.g., "Imperative verbs create a sense of authority and urgency").
• Which language level — categorise the term (lexis, grammar, phonology, pragmatics, discourse, graphology).

Organise your flashcards by language level so that you can revise systematically. The goal is to be able to define, identify, and explain the effect of every term on your cards within a few seconds.

Key terminology sets to cover:

Lexis and Semantics: concrete noun, abstract noun, proper noun, dynamic verb, stative verb, modal verb, attributive adjective, predicative adjective, evaluative adjective, adverb, pre-modifier, post-modifier, semantic field, collocation, connotation, denotation, figurative language, metaphor, simile, personification, metonymy, synecdoche, hyperbole, euphemism, dysphemism, neologism, archaism, borrowing/loanword, amelioration, pejoration, broadening, narrowing.

Grammar: declarative, interrogative, imperative, exclamative, simple sentence, compound sentence, complex sentence, subordinate clause, relative clause, active voice, passive voice, auxiliary verb, present tense, past tense, progressive aspect, perfect aspect, noun phrase, verb phrase, determiner, conjunction, coordinating conjunction, subordinating conjunction, complement, adjunct, subject, object, ellipsis, fronted adverbial, cleft sentence.

Phonology: alliteration, assonance, sibilance, plosive sounds, fricative sounds, onomatopoeia, rhyme, rhythm, stress, intonation, rising intonation, falling intonation, deletion, substitution, addition, assimilation, reduplication.

Pragmatics: implicature, presupposition, deixis, positive politeness, negative politeness, face-threatening act (FTA), positive face, negative face, Grice's maxims (quality, quantity, relevance, manner), speech act, illocutionary force, perlocutionary effect, adjacency pair, turn-taking, topic management.

Discourse: cohesion, coherence, anaphoric reference, cataphoric reference, exophoric reference, lexical cohesion, discourse marker, topic shift, agenda setting, framing, foregrounding, parallelism, antithesis.

Graphology: font, typeface, colour, layout, image, logo, caption, heading, subheading, bullet point, whitespace.

Strategy 2: Theory and Theorist Cards

Create a separate set of cards for each theory or theorist you need to know. On one side, write the name and date. On the other, write:

• Key claim — what does this theory argue?
• Key terms — what specific terminology is associated with this theory?
• Evidence for — what supports this theory?
• Evidence against / limitations — what are the criticisms?
• Relevant questions — which paper/section is this theory most relevant to?

Essential theorists for Paper 1 (CLA):

Theorist	Theory	Date	Key Idea
Skinner	Behaviourism	1957	Language learned through operant conditioning: imitation, reinforcement, shaping
Chomsky	Nativism	1965	Innate Language Acquisition Device (LAD); Universal Grammar; poverty of the stimulus
Piaget	Cognitive	1936	Language development depends on prior cognitive development; stages of cognitive development
Vygotsky	Social Interactionism	1978	Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD); scaffolding; More Knowledgeable Other (MKO)
Bruner	Social Interactionism	1983	Language Acquisition Support System (LASS); formats; scaffolding
Tomasello	Usage-Based	2003	General cognitive abilities + social learning; no need for LAD
Halliday	Functional	1975	Seven functions of children's language; language as meaning-making
Berko	Morphology	1958	Wug test — children apply morphological rules to novel words
Brown	Stages	1973	Stages of morpheme acquisition; Mean Length of Utterance (MLU)
Nelson	First words	1973	Categories of first words: naming, action, social, modifying
Kroll	Writing development	1981	Four phases: preparatory, consolidation, differentiation, integration
Rothery	Genre development	1996	Observation/comment, recount, report, narrative
Bard & Sachs	Social interaction	1977	Jim case study — exposure alone is insufficient; interaction is necessary

Essential theorists for Paper 2 (Language Change and Diversity):

Theorist	Theory	Date	Key Idea
Aitchison	Attitudes to change	1991	Damp spoon, crumbling castle, infectious disease metaphors
Labov	Social stratification	1966	New York department store study; social class affects language use
Trudgill	Covert prestige	1975	Norwich study; working-class speech carries covert prestige
Lakoff	Gender deficit	1975	Women's language as powerless: hedges, tag questions, empty adjectives
Tannen	Gender difference	1990	Six contrasts: status/support, independence/intimacy, conflict/compromise, etc.
O'Barr & Atkins	Powerless language	1980	"Women's language" is actually "powerless language" — linked to status, not gender
Cameron	Gender performance	2007	The Myth of Mars and Venus — gender differences in language are exaggerated
Crystal	Texting/technology	2008	Texting is creative language play, not linguistic decline
Kachru	World Englishes	1985	Three circles: Inner, Outer, Expanding
Chen	S-curve	1968	Language change follows an S-curve: slow start, rapid spread, levelling off
Fairclough	Critical discourse	1989	Language reflects and reproduces power relations

Strategy 3: Active Recall and Spaced Repetition

Simply reading through your cards is not enough. Use active recall — test yourself rather than passively reviewing. Cover the answer side and try to recall the information before checking. Use a spaced repetition schedule:

• New cards: review daily for the first week.
• Cards you recall correctly: review every 2-3 days.
• Cards you consistently recall: review weekly.
• Cards you struggle with: review daily until they stick.

Apps such as Anki or physical card systems (Leitner box method) can automate this process.

---

Practising with Unseen Data

You cannot predict what texts will appear on the exam, so the most effective revision is to practise analysing unseen material under timed conditions. Here is a structured approach:

Step 1: Collect a Range of Texts

Gather texts from a variety of genres, modes, and periods:

• Newspaper editorials (broadsheet and tabloid)
• Advertisements (print and digital)
• Speeches (political, ceremonial, persuasive)
• Spontaneous spoken transcripts
• Child language data (spoken and written)
• Historical texts (pre-1900)
• Online texts (blogs, social media posts, forum discussions)
• Literary non-fiction (travel writing, memoir, diary)

Step 2: Timed Analysis Practice

Set a timer for the appropriate duration (e.g., 45 minutes for a Section A response) and write a full analysis. Then review your response against the AQA mark scheme descriptors:

• Did you apply multiple language levels with precision?
• Did you use terminology accurately and with discrimination?
• Did you explain the effect of every feature you identified?
• Did you link your analysis to context (purpose, audience, mode, genre)?
• Did you make evaluative judgements, not just descriptive ones?

Step 3: Peer Review

If possible, swap practice responses with a classmate or study partner. Mark each other's work using the AQA mark scheme. Peer review forces you to engage critically with what constitutes a good answer, which improves your own writing.

---

Analytical Writing: PEA and PEAL Paragraphs

The paragraph structure you use in your analysis is fundamental to your mark. The two most common frameworks are PEA (Point, Evidence, Analysis) and PEAL (Point, Evidence, Analysis, Link).

PEA Structure

• Point — Make a clear analytical claim about the text.
• Evidence — Quote a specific word, phrase, or feature from the text.
• Analysis — Explain the effect of the evidence, using linguistic terminology.

PEAL Structure (Recommended for Top Bands)