The Gender-Neutral Language Debate

The debate about gender-neutral language is one of the most active and evolving language discourses, encompassing debates about pronouns, titles, job titles, and the relationship between linguistic change and social change. It connects to fundamental questions about the relationship between language and identity.

---

What Is Gender-Neutral Language?

Gender-neutral language (also called gender-inclusive language or non-sexist language) is language that avoids reference to a particular gender or that includes all genders equally. The movement towards gender-neutral language has several distinct strands:

• Removing gendered assumptions from job titles — "firefighter" instead of "fireman," "police officer" instead of "policeman," "flight attendant" instead of "stewardess"
• Using gender-neutral pronouns — "they/them" as singular pronouns, or neopronouns such as "ze/zir"
• Replacing gendered titles — "Mx" instead of "Mr/Mrs/Ms/Miss," "chair" instead of "chairman"
• Revising gendered default assumptions — "humankind" instead of "mankind," "staffing" instead of "manning," "first-year student" instead of "freshman"
• Using inclusive language for non-binary and transgender people — respecting individuals' chosen names and pronouns

Key Definition: Gender-neutral language — linguistic forms that avoid specifying or assuming a particular gender, used to promote inclusion and avoid reinforcing gender stereotypes. Also called gender-inclusive or non-sexist language.

---

The Singular "They"

The use of "they" as a singular pronoun is perhaps the most prominent and contested element of the gender-neutral language debate.

Historical Use

Contrary to popular belief, singular "they" is not a modern innovation. It has been used in English since at least the fourteenth century:

• Geoffrey Chaucer (c. 1395, The Canterbury Tales): "And whoso fyndeth hym out of swich blame, / They wol come up..."
• William Shakespeare (Much Ado About Nothing, 1599): "To strange sores strangely they strain the cure."
• Jane Austen (Pride and Prejudice, 1813): "Everybody began to find out that they had always distrusted the appearance of his goodness."

The prescription of "he" as a gender-neutral pronoun was a relatively recent development, formalised in the 1745 Act of Parliament that declared "the masculine shall be deemed to include the feminine." The grammarian Lindley Murray (1795) reinforced this rule, and it became standard in formal English.

The Case For Singular "They"

• Historical precedent — Singular "they" has been in continuous use for over 600 years
• Natural usage — Most English speakers use singular "they" naturally and unconsciously ("Someone left their umbrella")
• Clarity — Using "he or she" is cumbersome; "he/she" is visually awkward; generic "he" is misleading
• Inclusion — Singular "they" provides a pronoun for people who identify as non-binary or whose gender is unknown
• Institutional acceptance — The Washington Post, the APA Publication Manual (7th edition, 2019), and the Oxford English Dictionary all accept singular "they"
• In 2019, Merriam-Webster named singular "they" its Word of the Year

The Case Against Singular "They"

• Ambiguity — Singular "they" can be confusing when it is unclear whether "they" refers to one person or multiple people
• Grammatical tradition — "They" is grammatically plural; using it as a singular pronoun violates subject-verb agreement in some constructions
• Resistance to imposed change — Some people object to being told how to use pronouns, seeing it as an infringement on personal expression
• Generational and cultural differences — Older speakers and speakers from some cultural backgrounds may find singular "they" unnatural or confusing

---

The Title "Mx"

The gender-neutral title Mx (pronounced "mix" or "mux") was proposed as an alternative to gendered titles (Mr, Mrs, Ms, Miss) for people who do not wish to specify their gender. It has been adopted by several institutions:

• The Royal Mail added Mx to its database in 2015
• HMRC (Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs) accepts Mx on official forms
• Many banks, universities, and local councils now offer Mx as an option
• The Oxford English Dictionary added an entry for Mx in 2015

The adoption of Mx reflects broader changes in how gender is understood in society. The recognition that gender is not a simple binary (male/female) but a spectrum has created a need for linguistic forms that reflect this reality.

---

Inclusive Language Policies

Many organisations have adopted inclusive language policies that require or encourage the use of gender-neutral language. These include:

Organisation	Policy
Universities	Many ask staff to use students' preferred pronouns; some include pronoun badges
The European Parliament	Published guidelines on gender-neutral language in 2018
The BBC	Style guide recommends gender-neutral job titles and inclusive language
The Civil Service	Uses gender-neutral language in official documents
Major corporations	Many have adopted inclusive language policies for internal and external communication

These policies have been both praised (as evidence of institutional commitment to equality) and criticised (as examples of top-down language engineering that exceeds organisational authority).

---

Arguments For Gender-Neutral Language