You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The question of what Standard English is, who defines it, who should use it, and what its role in education and society should be is one of the most contested language discourses. It sits at the intersection of linguistics, education, politics, and social justice.
Standard English (SE) is the variety of English that is most widely used in published writing, formal education, government, the legal system, and the media. It is defined primarily by its grammar and vocabulary, not by accent — a speaker of Standard English can have any regional or social accent.
Key Definition: Standard English — the prestige variety of English used in formal written and spoken contexts, defined by its grammar and vocabulary rather than its accent. It is one dialect among many, but it holds unique social, educational, and institutional prestige.
Key characteristics of Standard English include:
It is crucial to understand what Standard English is not:
Although Standard English is not defined by accent, it is closely associated in the public mind with Received Pronunciation (RP) — the accent historically associated with the upper and upper-middle classes of southern England, public schools, the BBC, and institutions of power.
The term "Received Pronunciation" was coined by the phonetician Alexander John Ellis in 1869 and popularised by Daniel Jones, who described it in his English Pronouncing Dictionary (1917). "Received" here means "accepted in the best society."
RP has changed significantly over time and has declined as a marker of social prestige:
The BBC, which once required all presenters to speak RP (a policy known as "BBC English"), has increasingly welcomed regional accents since the 1960s. This reflects broader social changes — the democratisation of public life and the declining cultural authority of the upper classes.
One of the most contentious questions in the Standard English debate is who has the authority to define what is standard. Unlike French (regulated by the Académie française), English has no official regulating body. So who decides?
| Institution | Role |
|---|---|
| Dictionaries (OED, Merriam-Webster) | Record vocabulary and definitions; often treated as prescriptive authorities, though most modern dictionaries are descriptive in intent |
| Style guides (AP, Chicago, Guardian) | Set standards for published writing in specific contexts |
| Education system | Teaches and assesses Standard English; curriculum documents define what is "correct" |
| The media | Models Standard English in news reporting and formal broadcasting |
| Government | Publishes official documents in Standard English; sets educational policy |
| Publishing industry | Editors enforce Standard English conventions in published texts |
The linguist James Milroy (2001, "Language Ideologies and the Consequences of Standardization") argued that standardisation is an ongoing process, not a completed state. Standard English is not a fixed entity but a constantly negotiated set of conventions that is maintained by institutional practices — education, publishing, broadcasting — and that changes over time as these institutions change.
The most significant academic debate about Standard English in education took place between John Honey and Peter Trudgill in the 1990s.
In Language Is Power: The Story of Standard English and Its Enemies (1997), Honey argued that:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.