Language and Power

Language is not merely a neutral tool for communication — it is a mechanism through which power is exercised, negotiated, and resisted. This lesson examines the relationship between language and power, drawing on the work of Fairclough, Foucault, and others to explore how language constructs and maintains social hierarchies. You will analyse power in discourse (how power operates within interactions) and power behind discourse (the institutional structures that shape what can and cannot be said).

Key Definition: Power in the context of language study refers to the ability of individuals or institutions to influence, control, or constrain the behaviour, beliefs, and communication of others through linguistic means.

---

Types of Power

Fairclough (1989) distinguished between two fundamental types of power:

Instrumental Power

Key Definition: Instrumental power is power that is explicitly enforced through authority, rules, and institutions. It involves one party directly controlling or constraining another's behaviour.

Examples of instrumental power include:

• A judge instructing a jury.
• A police officer issuing a caution.
• A teacher setting homework.
• An employer giving a direct order to an employee.

Instrumental power is typically associated with specific roles and institutional positions. The language of instrumental power tends to be direct, imperative, and explicit. It is backed by the authority of the institution the speaker represents.

Influential Power

Key Definition: Influential power is power that operates through persuasion, shaping opinions and attitudes without direct coercion. It works by influencing how people think rather than directly controlling what they do.

Examples of influential power include:

• Advertising language that shapes consumer desires.
• Political rhetoric that frames public debate.
• Media language that determines which stories are told and how.
• Educational textbooks that define legitimate knowledge.

Influential power is more subtle and potentially more pervasive than instrumental power. It operates through the choices made about what language to use, what topics to address, and what perspectives to present as natural or commonsensical.

Power Type	Mechanism	Example	Language Features
Instrumental	Authority, coercion	Judge's instruction	Imperatives, declaratives, formal register
Influential	Persuasion, ideology	Advertising	Questions, inclusive pronouns, emotive lexis

---

Fairclough: Critical Discourse Analysis

Norman Fairclough (1989, 2001) developed Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) as a systematic method for revealing how power relations are embedded in everyday language use. CDA examines language at three levels:

1. Text — the linguistic features of the text itself (vocabulary, grammar, cohesion).
2. Discursive practice — how the text is produced, distributed, and consumed.
3. Social practice — the broader social and institutional context in which the text operates.

Key Concepts in Fairclough's Framework

Synthetic personalisation (discussed in the previous lesson) — the use of personalised language to address mass audiences, creating a false sense of intimacy.

Marketisation of discourse — Fairclough (1993) argued that public institutions (universities, the NHS, government services) have increasingly adopted the language of commerce: "customers," "stakeholders," "service delivery," "brand identity." This shift in language reflects and reinforces the penetration of market ideology into public life.

Naturalisation — the process by which particular ways of using language become so familiar that they appear natural and inevitable rather than ideological choices. For example, the use of passive voice in news reporting ("Shots were fired") removes agency and naturalises a particular way of understanding events.

Power in Discourse vs Power Behind Discourse

Key Definition: Power in discourse refers to how power is exercised within specific interactions — who controls the topic, who speaks, who is silenced. Power behind discourse refers to the institutional and social structures that determine what kinds of discourse are possible — who has access to public platforms, what counts as legitimate knowledge, and what voices are marginalised.

This distinction is crucial for A-Level analysis. Power in discourse is visible in conversation: the interviewer who controls the questions, the teacher who allocates turns, the chair who sets the agenda. Power behind discourse is structural: the editorial decisions that determine what appears in newspapers, the examination boards that define what counts as knowledge, the social norms that make some language varieties acceptable and others stigmatised.

---

Political Rhetoric

Political language provides some of the clearest examples of power exercised through language. Politicians use a range of rhetorical strategies to persuade, inspire, and control.

Rhetorical Devices in Political Speech