You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Institutions — legal, medical, educational, governmental, corporate — use distinctive forms of language that serve specific functions. But institutional language is not merely functional; it is also a tool of power. The language of institutions can include, exclude, empower, or disempower. This lesson examines how institutional language operates, the key theories for analysing it, and how it constructs and maintains power relationships.
Institutional language refers to the specialised varieties of language used within and by institutions — organisations that have formal structures, rules, and authority within society. Each institution develops its own register, characterised by distinctive vocabulary, grammatical structures, and discourse conventions.
| Institution | Key Language Features | Function |
|---|---|---|
| Legal | Technical jargon, archaic terms, complex syntax, passive voice, nominalisation | Precision, authority, tradition |
| Medical | Latin/Greek terminology, euphemism, hedging, nominalisation | Precision, professional distance, authority |
| Educational | Assessment criteria language, metalanguage, nominalisation | Standardisation, measurement, authority |
| Bureaucratic | Impersonal constructions, passive voice, nominalisation, acronyms | Efficiency, impersonality, authority |
| Corporate | Buzzwords, metaphor, positive lexis, nominalisation | Motivation, branding, obfuscation |
Key Definition: Institutional language — the distinctive varieties of language used within formal organisations, characterised by specialised vocabulary, complex syntax, and conventions that both serve functional purposes and construct power relationships.
The linguist Norman Fairclough (1989, 2001) developed Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), one of the most important frameworks for analysing the relationship between language and power. Fairclough's key concepts include:
An order of discourse is the set of discursive practices (genres, styles, discourses) associated with a particular institution or social domain. For example, the order of discourse of a hospital includes medical consultations, patient records, prescriptions, consent forms, signage, and public health campaigns — each with its own conventions.
Fairclough argues that every communicative event has three dimensions:
| Dimension | Focus | Example Questions |
|---|---|---|
| Text | The linguistic features of the text itself | What vocabulary, grammar, and textual structures are used? |
| Discursive practice | How the text is produced, distributed, and consumed | Who created the text? For whom? Through what channels? |
| Social practice | The broader social and institutional context | What power relations does the text reflect or construct? What ideologies does it embody? |
Fairclough distinguishes between:
Key Definition: Critical Discourse Analysis — an approach to language study that examines how language use is shaped by and shapes power relations, ideologies, and social structures (Fairclough, 1989).
Legal language (sometimes called legalese) is one of the most distinctive and powerful institutional registers. Its features include:
| Feature | Example | Function |
|---|---|---|
| Archaic vocabulary | "hereinafter," "whereas," "notwithstanding," "aforementioned" | Tradition, precision, authority |
| French and Latin terms | "habeas corpus," "voir dire," "tort," "plaintiff" | Historical prestige, international legal tradition |
| Complex syntax | Sentences of 100+ words with multiple subordinate clauses | Precision — anticipating all possible interpretations and exceptions |
| Passive voice | "The defendant is charged with..." | Impersonality, objectivity, focus on action rather than agent |
| Nominalisation | "The commission of the offence" rather than "when X committed the offence" | Abstraction, formality, removal of human agency |
| Doublets and triplets | "null and void," "cease and desist," "give, devise, and bequeath" | Historical comprehensiveness (one English word, one French word, one Latin word to ensure all audiences understood) |
| Performative language | "I hereby sentence you..." / "I pronounce you married" | Language that does things — speech acts (Austin, 1962) |
Legal language creates a power asymmetry between legal professionals and lay people. If you cannot understand the language of the law, you cannot fully participate in the legal system — you become dependent on legal professionals to interpret it for you. This dependence is itself a form of power.
The Plain English Campaign and movements for accessible legal language argue that legal language should be simplified to empower citizens. Critics respond that legal precision is necessary and that simplification could create ambiguity.
Medical language creates similar power dynamics to legal language:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.