You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The dramatic representation of the First World War poses distinctive challenges. How do you stage trench warfare? How do you represent mass death in a medium designed for living bodies? How do you create the sounds, smells, and physical sensations of combat in a theatre? The plays that have attempted to answer these questions — from R.C. Sherriff's Journey's End (1928) to Joan Littlewood's Oh! What a Lovely War (1963) — represent some of the most innovative and powerful responses to the conflict.
| Challenge | Detail |
|---|---|
| Scale | War involves millions of people, vast landscapes, and events that span years. The stage is small, intimate, and bounded by time |
| Violence | The most devastating events of the war — artillery bombardment, gas attacks, machine-gun fire — are almost impossible to represent realistically on stage |
| The body | Drama uses living actors. The central reality of war — death, injury, the destruction of the body — is profoundly difficult to represent with performers who must get up and take a bow at the end |
| Time | A play typically covers hours or days. The war lasted four years. Dramatic time must be compressed, focused, or fragmented |
| Perspective | Poetry can be the voice of a single speaker; the novel can enter multiple minds. Drama must create perspective through dialogue, action, and staging |
AO2 Insight: The very limitations of the stage can become strengths. Confinement to a single set (as in Journey's End) can enact the claustrophobia of the trenches. The presence of living bodies makes death more shocking, not less. The conventions of theatrical performance — curtain calls, interval drinks, the audience's comfortable seats — create an ironic gap between the world of the play and the world of the auditorium.
Journey's End is the most performed and most studied WW1 play. Written by Sherriff — himself a veteran who was wounded at Passchendaele — it was initially rejected by London producers who believed audiences would not want to watch a war play. Its success, when it finally reached the stage in 1929, was immediate and overwhelming.
| Element | Detail |
|---|---|
| Setting | A single dugout in the British front line trenches, March 1918, during the lead-up to the German Spring Offensive |
| Time span | Four days — from the arrival of 2nd Lieutenant Raleigh to the final German attack |
| Unity of place | The entire play takes place in the dugout. The audience never sees No Man's Land, the enemy, or the attack. Everything happens offstage — reported, anticipated, or implied |
| Character | Role | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Captain Stanhope | Company commander; 21 years old; a public-school hero turned alcoholic | The central figure. Stanhope holds himself together through willpower and whisky. His breakdown is the play's emotional arc |
| 2nd Lt Raleigh | New officer; 18 years old; hero-worships Stanhope from school | Raleigh's innocence and enthusiasm contrast with Stanhope's exhaustion. His death in the final scene is the play's devastating climax |
| Lt Osborne ("Uncle") | Stanhope's second-in-command; older, calm, bookish | The moral centre of the play. His death during a raid ordered by the Colonel is the event that breaks Stanhope's composure |
| 2nd Lt Trotter | Cheerful, working-class, preoccupied with food | Provides comic relief; his ordinariness humanises the officers |
| Private Mason | The company cook | His struggles with unappetising food provide dark comedy |
| The Colonel | Orders the raid that kills Osborne | Represents the military hierarchy; his casual ordering of a suicidal mission echoes Sassoon's "The General" |
| Theme | How It Is Explored |
|---|---|
| Masculinity under pressure | The play examines the code of the English public school — courage, duty, "playing the game" — and shows how it simultaneously sustains and destroys the officers who live by it. Stanhope's alcoholism is the price of maintaining the mask |
| Class | The officers are overwhelmingly public-school men. The language of the school — "ripping," "absolutely top-hole" — persists in the trenches, creating a bizarre disconnect between register and situation |
| The futility of command | The raid ordered by the Colonel is militarily pointless — its only purpose is to capture a German soldier for identification. Osborne dies for nothing. The Colonel's breezy "I'm awfully glad" when told the raid has "succeeded" is one of the play's most devastating moments |
| Comradeship | The relationships between the officers — particularly Stanhope and Osborne, and Stanhope and Raleigh — are the play's emotional centre. These relationships are deeper, more intimate, and more complex than the men can articulate |
| What cannot be said | The play is defined by its silences — what the characters cannot or will not express. Stanhope's feelings for Raleigh, Osborne's fear, the men's awareness of their likely deaths — all are present but unspoken |
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.