You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The AQA Changing Places specification requires a study of a contrasting or distant place — your "far place." This is a place you may not be able to visit easily (or at all), meaning you must rely more heavily on secondary data and develop awareness of your own positionality as an outsider. This lesson covers methodology for studying a contrasting place, the use and evaluation of secondary data, comparison techniques, and the critical importance of positionality in geographical research.
Your contrasting place should differ from your local place in significant ways. The contrast might be based on:
| Dimension of Contrast | Example Pairing |
|---|---|
| Urban vs rural | Inner-city Manchester vs a village in the Yorkshire Dales |
| Affluent vs deprived | Richmond upon Thames vs Jaywick, Essex |
| Growing vs declining | Cambridge (tech boom, population growth) vs Blackpool (deindustrialisation, population decline) |
| Multicultural vs homogeneous | Tower Hamlets, London (highly diverse) vs Allerdale, Cumbria (96% White British, Census 2021) |
| Post-industrial vs service economy | Stoke-on-Trent (former potteries) vs Bristol (creative and digital economy) |
| Northern vs Southern | Middlesbrough vs Guildford — illustrating the "North-South divide" |
Exam Tip: The quality of your contrast matters. Choose places that are different in ways that connect to the key Changing Places concepts — sense of place, identity, representation, endogenous/exogenous factors, and change over time. The examiner wants to see you apply these concepts comparatively, not just describe two places side by side.
Since you may not be able to visit your contrasting place, you will rely primarily on secondary data — data collected by others for other purposes that you can repurpose for your study.
| Source | Type of Data | What It Reveals | Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Census 2021 | Quantitative | Population, age, ethnicity, occupation, housing, qualifications | Comprehensive, comparable, covers every area | Conducted every 10 years — may be outdated; self-reported; does not capture undocumented residents |
| Index of Multiple Deprivation | Quantitative | Composite deprivation score across 7 domains | Fine-grained (LSOA level); multi-dimensional | England only; composite score may mask variation between domains; updated infrequently |
| Google Street View | Visual/qualitative | Streetscapes, building condition, land use | Free, accessible, covers most of the UK; allows virtual "visits" | Images may be several years old; limited angles; cannot capture atmosphere, sounds, or smells |
| Local newspaper archives | Qualitative | Community concerns, events, debates, local identity | Captures local perspectives and controversies | May have editorial bias; coverage may be selective |
| Social media | Qualitative | How residents and visitors represent and discuss a place | Real-time, diverse voices, unfiltered | Self-selecting sample; may be unrepresentative; ethical issues with using people's posts |
| Planning documents | Quantitative/qualitative | Development proposals, regeneration strategies, consultation responses | Official, detailed, forward-looking | Technical language; may not reflect residents' views; aspirational rather than descriptive |
| Photography and film | Qualitative | Visual representations and cultural associations | Powerful, memorable, shapes perception | Always selective and constructed; photographer/filmmaker's perspective dominates |
| Academic studies | Mixed | In-depth research findings from geographers, sociologists, historians | Rigorous methodology, peer-reviewed | May be dated; may use jargon; may reflect researcher's theoretical framework |
| Oral history archives | Qualitative | First-person accounts of place experience over time | Rich, personal, captures voices often excluded from official records | Memory is selective; small samples; may idealise the past |
A-Level Analysis: No single secondary source is sufficient. The strongest place studies triangulate — using multiple sources to cross-check and enrich understanding. Census data tells you the demographic profile; Google Street View shows you what the place looks like; local newspaper archives reveal community concerns; academic studies provide analytical depth.
Comparing your near and far places systematically is essential for the AQA specification. Several techniques can structure your comparison:
| Indicator | Near Place (e.g., Headingley, Leeds) | Far Place (e.g., Jaywick, Essex) |
|---|---|---|
| IMD Decile | 4–5 (moderate deprivation) | 1 (most deprived in England) |
| Dominant land use | Residential (student HMOs), retail, cafes | Residential (bungalows/chalets), limited retail |
| Housing type | Victorian terraces, some purpose-built student flats | 1930s holiday chalets converted to permanent housing |
| Age profile | Young (dominated by 18–25 student population) | Mixed — older retired residents and young families |
| Sense of place | Lively, transient, student-dominated, diverse | Isolated, stigmatised by media, strong community bonds |
| Key exogenous factor | University expansion attracting 60,000 students | Seaside resort decline; lack of government investment |
Organise your comparison around key themes from the specification:
graph TD
A[Comparative Place Study] --> B[Physical Character]
A --> C[Demographic Profile]
A --> D[Economic Function]
A --> E[Sense of Place]
A --> F[Representations]
A --> G[Change Over Time]
B --> B1["How does physical<br/>geography differ?"]
C --> C1["How do populations<br/>compare?"]
D --> D1["What are the economic<br/>bases?"]
E --> E1["How do insiders and<br/>outsiders perceive each place?"]
F --> F1["How are they represented<br/>in media and data?"]
G --> G1["What processes of<br/>change are occurring?"]
Positionality refers to the social and cultural position from which a researcher observes and interprets the world. Your positionality shapes what you notice, how you interpret data, and the conclusions you draw.
Key Definition: Positionality is the researcher's social, cultural, and geographical position — including their age, gender, ethnicity, class, education, and relationship to the place being studied — and how this position influences their research.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.