You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Globalisation has generated enormous wealth, interconnection, and cultural exchange — but it has also provoked significant opposition, resistance, and backlash. This final lesson examines the challenges facing globalisation and the diverse forms of resistance it has provoked, from anti-globalisation protests to the rise of nationalism and protectionism.
After decades of rapid growth, there are signs that globalisation may be slowing or even retreating — a process sometimes called "deglobalisation" or "slowbalisation":
| Indicator | Evidence of Slowbalisation |
|---|---|
| Trade growth | Global trade growth has slowed — trade grew faster than GDP before 2008 but has broadly matched GDP growth since |
| FDI | Global FDI flows have declined from their 2007 peak of 2trilliontoapproximately1.3 trillion |
| Trade wars | US-China trade war (from 2018) — tariffs imposed on hundreds of billions of dollars of goods |
| Brexit | UK's departure from the EU single market — the most significant act of economic disintegration in modern history |
| COVID-19 | Pandemic exposed vulnerabilities of global supply chains; prompted "reshoring" and "nearshoring" |
| Geopolitical fragmentation | Russia-Ukraine war (2022) disrupted energy and food markets; sanctions regime |
| Technology decoupling | US-China competition over semiconductors, AI, and 5G — "tech Cold War" |
graph TD
A[Challenges to Globalisation] --> B["Geopolitical Tensions<br>US-China rivalry, Russia-Ukraine"]
A --> C["Economic Nationalism<br>Trade wars, tariffs, reshoring"]
A --> D["Supply Chain Vulnerabilities<br>COVID-19, Suez Canal blockage 2021"]
A --> E["Environmental Crisis<br>Climate change, resource depletion"]
A --> F["Social Backlash<br>Inequality, anti-globalisation movements"]
A --> G["Pandemic<br>COVID-19 border closures, vaccine nationalism"]
Organised resistance to globalisation emerged prominently in the late 1990s and has taken diverse forms:
The WTO Ministerial Conference in Seattle, USA, in November 1999 was disrupted by approximately 40,000-60,000 protesters from a coalition of trade unions, environmental groups, human rights organisations, and anarchist movements. The protests succeeded in disrupting the conference and brought anti-globalisation sentiment to mainstream attention.
Key grievances included:
The World Social Forum (WSF) was established in 2001 in Porto Alegre, Brazil, as a counterpoint to the World Economic Forum in Davos. Its slogan — "Another World Is Possible" — reflects the belief that alternatives to neoliberal globalisation exist.
The WSF brings together civil society organisations, social movements, and activists from around the world to discuss alternatives to corporate-driven globalisation. It emphasises:
The Occupy Wall Street movement, beginning in September 2011 in New York's Zuccotti Park, highlighted the concentration of wealth among the "1%" and the growing inequality associated with globalisation. The slogan "We are the 99%" became a global rallying cry, with Occupy protests spreading to over 80 countries.
Protectionism — the use of government policies to restrict international trade and protect domestic industries — represents the most direct economic challenge to globalisation.
| Type | How It Works | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Tariffs | Taxes on imported goods, making them more expensive | US tariffs on Chinese steel (25%) and aluminium (10%) imposed in 2018 |
| Quotas | Limits on the quantity of a good that can be imported | EU quotas on Chinese textile imports |
| Subsidies | Government payments to domestic producers, giving them a cost advantage | EU Common Agricultural Policy (€55 billion/year); US farm subsidies |
| Non-tariff barriers | Regulations, standards, and bureaucratic requirements that restrict imports | Japanese food safety standards; EU environmental regulations |
| Exchange rate manipulation | Deliberately devaluing currency to make exports cheaper | USA accused China of currency manipulation |
| Sanctions | Politically motivated trade restrictions | Western sanctions on Russia following Ukraine invasion (2022) |
| Arguments For | Arguments Against |
|---|---|
| Protects domestic jobs and industries from unfair foreign competition | Raises prices for consumers and reduces choice |
| Allows "infant industries" to develop before facing global competition | Invites retaliation — trade wars harm all parties |
| Protects national security — maintaining strategic industries | Reduces economic efficiency — resources allocated to uncompetitive industries |
| Can address unfair practices (dumping, subsidies) by trading partners | Historically, protectionism has been associated with economic decline |
| Preserves cultural industries and traditions | Benefits specific interest groups (producers) at the expense of consumers |
Case Study: The US-China Trade War — In 2018, President Trump imposed tariffs on approximately 370billionofChineseimports.Chinaretaliatedwithtariffson110 billion of US goods. Effects included higher prices for US consumers (estimated cost of $1,300 per household annually), disruption to agricultural exports (US soybean exports to China fell by 75%), and acceleration of supply chain diversification. The trade war illustrated both the appeal and the costs of protectionism.
The rise of nationalism and populism in many countries represents a political backlash against globalisation. Populist leaders typically frame globalisation as a threat to national identity, sovereignty, and the livelihoods of ordinary people.
| Country | Movement/Leader | Key Anti-Globalisation Features |
|---|---|---|
| UK | Brexit (2016) | Withdrawal from EU; "Take Back Control" slogan; reduced immigration |
| USA | Trump (2016, 2024) | "America First"; trade wars; immigration restrictions; withdrawal from Paris Agreement |
| France | Marine Le Pen / RN | Opposition to EU integration; anti-immigration; protection of French culture |
| India | Modi / BJP | Hindu nationalism; "Make in India" manufacturing drive; cultural assertiveness |
| Brazil | Bolsonaro (2018-2022) | Anti-globalist rhetoric; environmental deregulation; nationalism |
| Hungary | Orban | "Illiberal democracy"; anti-immigration; EU scepticism |
The UK's vote to leave the EU in June 2016 was the most significant act of economic and political disintegration in modern Western history. It illustrates the tensions between globalisation and national sovereignty:
| Drivers of Brexit | Consequences of Brexit |
|---|---|
| Concerns about immigration — especially post-2004 EU enlargement | UK-EU trade fell by ~15% in the first year |
| Desire to "take back control" of laws and borders | Labour shortages in agriculture, hospitality, healthcare, logistics |
| Perception that EU membership benefited London/elites, not ordinary people | Northern Ireland Protocol created trade barriers within the UK |
| Sovereignty arguments — opposition to EU regulations | Loss of frictionless access to the world's largest single market |
| Leave campaign's promise of £350 million/week for the NHS | Economic output estimated 4% lower than it would have been without Brexit (by 2023) |
Exam Tip: Brexit is an excellent case study for discussing the tensions between globalisation and sovereignty. Use it to evaluate whether the benefits of global integration (trade, investment, labour mobility) outweigh the costs (loss of sovereignty, cultural anxieties, uneven distribution of benefits).
Globalisation poses profound environmental challenges that current governance structures struggle to address:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.