You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
This lesson covers statics at A-Level — the study of objects in equilibrium under the action of coplanar forces. Statics problems involve finding unknown forces, angles, or distances when a body is not accelerating.
A body is in equilibrium when:
For a particle (all forces act at one point), only the force conditions are needed. For a rigid body, both force and moment conditions are needed.
To apply equilibrium conditions, resolve all forces into two perpendicular components (typically horizontal and vertical):
Horizontal: ∑Fx=0 Vertical: ∑Fy=0
Example: A particle is in equilibrium under three forces: 10 N acting horizontally to the right, a force P at 30 degrees above the horizontal to the left, and a vertical force Q downwards.
Horizontal: 10−Pcos30°=0, so P=cos30°10=11.5 N
Vertical: Psin30°−Q=0, so Q=11.5×sin30°=5.77 N
If three forces acting on a particle are in equilibrium, they can be represented as the sides of a triangle (drawn head to tail). This is known as the triangle of forces.
Conversely, if three forces form a closed triangle when drawn head to tail, the forces are in equilibrium.
This method is particularly useful when the forces act at known angles, as it allows the use of the sine rule and cosine rule to find unknowns.
If three forces acting at a point are in equilibrium, and the angles between the forces are α, β, and γ (where α+β+γ=360°):
sinαF1=sinβF2=sinγF3
where α is the angle opposite F1, etc.
Exam Tip: Lami's theorem is a quick method for three-force equilibrium problems but only works when exactly three forces act at a point. The angles are the angles between the forces, not the angles the forces make with the horizontal.
For a rigid body (e.g., a beam or ladder), take moments about a suitable point to set up equations.
Strategy:
Choose the pivot point wisely — selecting a point where unknown forces act eliminates those unknowns from the moment equation.
A common statics problem involves a ladder leaning against a wall:
Equilibrium equations:
From the moments equation: Rwall=2sinθWcosθ=2tanθW
Exam Tip: In statics problems, always start by drawing a complete force diagram. Label every force clearly. Then choose the most efficient combination of equations (resolve horizontally, resolve vertically, take moments) to solve for the unknowns. Avoid unnecessary equations — three unknowns require three equations.
AQA 7357 specification, Paper 3 — Mechanics, Sections U and V (Year 2) covers moments in simple static contexts (refer to the official specification document for exact wording).; "Solve problems involving rigid bodies in equilibrium under coplanar forces, including ladders, hinged rods and beams". Statics sits at the apex of the Mechanics strand: it requires confident handling of vectors (Section O), Newton's laws and resolved forces (Section P), friction (Section Q) and moments (the new Year 2 content of Section U). The defining new idea is that for a rigid body — as opposed to a particle — equilibrium demands two simultaneous conditions: ∑F=0 (no translation) and ∑M=0 about any point (no rotation). The AQA formula booklet does not give moment formulae explicitly; the result M=Fd (force times perpendicular distance) and the identity M=Frsinθ for a force at angle θ to a position vector of length r must be memorised.
Question (8 marks):
A uniform ladder AB of weight W and length 2a rests with end A on rough horizontal ground and end B against a smooth vertical wall. The ladder is inclined at angle θ to the horizontal. The coefficient of friction between the ladder and the ground is μ. Show that, for the ladder to remain in equilibrium, μ≥2tanθ1, and hence find the smallest possible value of θ if μ=41.
Solution with mark scheme:
Step 1 — diagram and forces.
Forces acting on the ladder:
B1 — correct free-body diagram with all four forces and directions labelled.
Step 2 — resolve horizontally and vertically.
Horizontal: F=S. Vertical: N=W.
M1 — both resolved equations stated correctly.
Step 3 — take moments about A (eliminates N and F).
Moments of W: lever arm =acosθ (horizontal distance from A to G), so moment =Wacosθ clockwise. Moments of S: lever arm =2asinθ (vertical height of B above A), so moment =S⋅2asinθ anticlockwise.
Setting ∑MA=0:
S⋅2asinθ=W⋅acosθ
M1 — taking moments about a sensible pivot (A chosen to eliminate two unknowns). A1 — correct moment equation.
Step 4 — solve for S.
S=2asinθWacosθ=2tanθW
A1 — correct expression for S.
Step 5 — apply the friction inequality.
For limiting equilibrium or any static state, F≤μN. Substituting F=S and N=W:
S≤μW⟹2tanθW≤μW
Dividing by W (positive):
μ≥2tanθ1
M1 — correct application of the friction limit F≤μN. A1 — printed inequality obtained, with the inequality direction justified.
Step 6 — substitute μ=41.
41≥2tanθ1⟹2tanθ≥4⟹tanθ≥2
So the minimum angle is θ=arctan(2)≈63.43°.
A1 — correct minimum angle stated to a sensible degree of precision.
Total: 8 marks (B1 M3 A4).
Question (6 marks): A uniform horizontal beam AB of length 4m and mass 20kg is freely hinged at A to a vertical wall. The beam is held horizontal by a light inextensible cable attached to the beam at B and to the wall at a point C above A. The cable makes an angle of 30° with the beam. A particle of mass 5kg hangs from B. Find the tension in the cable and the magnitude of the reaction at the hinge A. Take g=9.8m s−2.
Mark scheme decomposition by AO:
Total: 6 marks split AO1 = 4, AO2 = 1, AO3 = 1. Statics questions in AQA Paper 3 are AO1-heavy because the technique is procedural once the model is drawn correctly; the AO3 mark is reserved for the modelling step (correctly identifying which forces act where), and the AO2 mark for combining the components into a single vector magnitude with appropriate accuracy.
Connects to:
Mechanics Section O — Vectors: every force in a statics problem is a 2-D vector. Resolving a tension along and perpendicular to a beam, and recombining hinge components into a magnitude X2+Y2 and direction arctan(Y/X), is direct vector arithmetic. The r×F representation of a moment generalises naturally to the cross product in further mechanics.
Mechanics Section P — Forces and Newton's laws: the ∑F=0 condition for a rigid body is the static specialisation of Newton's second law F=ma with a=0. The same free-body diagrams and resolution techniques carry over directly from particle dynamics.
Mechanics Section Q — Friction: ladder problems are the canonical context where friction inequality F≤μN becomes the binding constraint. The transition from F<μN (genuine static equilibrium) to F=μN (limiting equilibrium, on the verge of slipping) is a key conceptual distinction examined repeatedly.
Pure Section L — Trigonometry: every statics calculation involves resolving forces using sinθ and cosθ. Exact-value trigonometry is rewarded in modelling questions where forces are at 30°, 45° or 60° — students who use sin60°=3/2 rather than 0.866 keep all later answers in exact form.
Engineering and physics application: statics is the foundational subject for civil and mechanical engineering. Truss analysis, beam bending and bridge design all begin with rigid-body equilibrium under coplanar forces. The "method of joints" and "method of sections" used to analyse pin-jointed trusses are direct extensions of the moment and resolution techniques studied here.
Statics questions on AQA 7357 Paper 3 split AO marks roughly:
| AO | Typical share | Earned by |
|---|---|---|
| AO1 (knowledge / procedure) | 55–70% | Resolving forces correctly, taking moments about a sensible point, applying F≤μN, solving simultaneous linear equations |
| AO2 (reasoning / interpretation) | 15–25% | Justifying the choice of pivot, interpreting "limiting equilibrium" or "smooth wall" correctly, presenting answers with sensible accuracy and units |
| AO3 (modelling / problem-solving) | 15–25% | Drawing the free-body diagram, deciding which idealisations apply (light rod, smooth contact, uniform beam), interpreting the physical situation in mathematical form |
Examiner-rewarded phrasing: "taking moments about A to eliminate the hinge reaction"; "by symmetry, the centre of mass lies at the midpoint of the beam"; "since the wall is smooth, the reaction at B is horizontal"; "for limiting equilibrium, F=μN, and so…". Phrases that lose marks: omitting units on a force ("T=294" rather than "T=294N"); rounding mid-calculation rather than at the end; using ≥ when the question asks for the minimum value (which is an equality at the boundary).
A specific AQA pattern to watch: questions phrased "show that the ladder will not slip" expect a clean inequality argument: derive an expression for the required friction coefficient, then compare with the given μ. Conversely, "find the smallest angle such that…" expects an equality at the boundary of limiting equilibrium. Reading the command word precisely — "show", "find", "determine the minimum" — flags which logical structure is wanted.
Question: A uniform plank of length 3m and weight 120N rests horizontally on two supports, one at each end. Find the magnitudes of the reactions at the two supports.
Grade C response (~150 words):
By symmetry, since the plank is uniform and the supports are at the ends, the weight is shared equally between them. Each reaction is therefore 2120=60N.
Examiner commentary: Full marks (3/3). The candidate has spotted the symmetry argument and applied it correctly. While a more formal answer would set up the moment equation explicitly, the symmetry argument is acceptable here because the configuration is genuinely symmetric. A Grade B answer would normally also state ∑Fy=0 to confirm R1+R2=120 as a check.
Grade A response (~190 words):*
Let RA and RB be the reactions at the supports at the ends A and B respectively. The plank is uniform, so its weight W=120N acts at the midpoint G, which is 1.5m from each end.
Taking moments about A:
RB⋅3=120⋅1.5⟹RB=60N
Resolving vertically:
RA+RB=120⟹RA=60N
Examiner commentary: Full marks (3/3). The candidate sets up the model formally with named reactions, identifies the location of the centre of mass explicitly using the "uniform" assumption, takes moments about a chosen pivot, and verifies the result by resolving vertically. The dual derivation (moments + resolution) demonstrates examiner-aware redundancy checking. This is the kind of presentation discipline that pays off on longer questions where one slip would otherwise be unrecoverable.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.