The 'Presidential PM' Debate

One of the most important and frequently examined debates in A-Level Politics is whether the UK Prime Minister has become "presidential". This lesson examines the academic debate, the evidence for and against presidentialism, and how to construct a strong essay answer.

---

What Does 'Presidential' Mean?

The term "presidential" is used loosely in UK politics to describe a PM who:

• Acts as a dominant, above-party national leader.
• Centralises power in No. 10 at the expense of Cabinet.
• Relies on a personal mandate and media profile rather than collective decision-making.
• Marginalises Cabinet and governs through a small inner circle.
• Engages in spatial leadership — positioning themselves apart from and above their party.

The comparison is primarily with the US President, who is directly elected, serves as both head of state and head of government, and has a personal mandate separate from Congress.

---

The Academic Debate

Michael Foley's 'Presidential Thesis'

The political scientist Michael Foley has argued (in The Rise of the British Presidency, 1993, and The British Presidency, 2000) that the UK PM has become increasingly presidential. Key elements of his thesis include: