You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The bottom-up approach to offender profiling was developed in the United Kingdom by David Canter in the late 1980s and 1990s. Unlike the top-down approach, which starts with pre-existing typologies and matches evidence to them, the bottom-up approach is data-driven — it starts with the details of the crime scene and uses statistical analysis and psychological theory to build a profile from the evidence upwards. Canter argued that profiling should be grounded in scientific methodology rather than clinical intuition.
Key Definition: The bottom-up approach to offender profiling uses statistical techniques and psychological theory to analyse crime scene data and generate predictions about offender characteristics, without relying on pre-existing typologies.
Canter (1990, 1994) developed the field of investigative psychology, which applies established psychological theory and statistical methods to criminal investigation. The key principle is that offending behaviour is not random — it reflects the offender's psychological characteristics, social interactions, and everyday life in predictable ways.
The way an offender interacts with the victim during a crime reflects how they interact with people in their everyday life. For example:
This concept is based on the idea that people behave consistently across different situations — a principle supported by personality psychology.
Some offenders demonstrate knowledge of forensic investigation techniques at the crime scene. This may include:
Forensic awareness suggests the offender may have prior convictions and experience with police procedures, or may have researched forensic techniques.
Where and when an offence occurs can reveal important information about the offender:
An offender's past criminal record and the way their crimes evolve over time provide behavioural data. Offenders may escalate from less to more serious offences, or their modus operandi (method of operation) may become more sophisticated.
Key Definition: Investigative psychology is a bottom-up approach to offender profiling that uses psychological theory and statistical techniques to identify patterns in offending behaviour and generate predictions about offender characteristics.
Canter and Heritage (1990) used a statistical technique called smallest space analysis to examine data from 66 sexual assaults. SSA is a form of multidimensional scaling that identifies correlations between different aspects of offending behaviour and represents them spatially — behaviours that tend to co-occur are plotted close together, while those that do not are plotted further apart.
Canter and Heritage identified five key variables that characterised the behaviour of sexual offenders:
These variables allowed offences to be linked to the same offender and predictions to be made about offender characteristics. For example, offenders who used excessive violence during assaults tended to have previous convictions for violent (not just sexual) offences.
Geographical profiling examines the spatial patterns of an offender's crimes to predict where they are likely to live. It is based on the principle of spatial consistency — offenders tend to operate within a familiar geographical area.
Canter and Larkin (1993) proposed the circle hypothesis, which draws a circle around the two crimes furthest apart in an offender's series. The hypothesis predicts that:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.