You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The Multi-Store Model (MSM) was proposed by Atkinson & Shiffrin (1968) and was the first comprehensive model of how memory works. It describes memory as a linear flow of information through three distinct stores: the sensory register, short-term memory (STM), and long-term memory (LTM). Despite its limitations, the MSM remains a foundational model in cognitive psychology and is a core component of the AQA A-Level specification.
Key Definition: The Multi-Store Model is a representation of how memory works in terms of three stores (sensory register, STM, LTM) and the processes that transfer information between them (attention, encoding, rehearsal, retrieval).
graph LR
A["Sensory Register"] -->|Attention| B["Short-Term Memory (STM)"]
B -->|Maintenance Rehearsal| B
B -->|Elaborative Rehearsal| C["Long-Term Memory (LTM)"]
C -->|Retrieval| B
A -->|Not attended to| D["Information lost"]
B -->|Not rehearsed| E["Information lost via decay/displacement"]
The sensory register is the first store. All incoming sensory information enters here.
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Duration | Very brief — less than half a second for visual (iconic) and 2–4 seconds for auditory (echoic) |
| Capacity | Very large — receives all sensory input simultaneously |
| Encoding | Modality-specific — stored in the form it was received (visual, auditory, haptic, etc.) |
STM is the second store, where information is held temporarily for immediate use.
| Feature | Detail | Key Research |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | Limited to approximately 7 ± 2 items | Miller (1956) — "The magical number seven, plus or minus two." Miller also demonstrated that chunking can increase the effective capacity by grouping individual items into meaningful units. |
| Duration | 18–30 seconds without rehearsal | Peterson & Peterson (1959) — gave participants a consonant trigram (e.g., BKG) and asked them to count backwards in threes from a specified number (to prevent rehearsal). After 3 seconds, recall was about 80%; after 18 seconds, only about 3%. This shows STM duration is very short without maintenance rehearsal. |
| Encoding | Primarily acoustic (sound-based) | Baddeley (1966) — gave participants lists of acoustically similar words (e.g., cat, cab, can) and acoustically dissimilar words. Recall of acoustically similar words from STM was significantly worse, suggesting STM relies on acoustic encoding. |
Key Definition: Maintenance rehearsal is the process of repeating information over and over to keep it in STM. According to the MSM, prolonged maintenance rehearsal leads to transfer to LTM.
| Feature | Detail | Key Research |
|---|---|---|
| Digit span | A method of measuring STM capacity | Jacobs (1887) — found the average digit span was 9.3 items for digits and 7.3 items for letters. Digits are easier because there are only 10 possible digits (0–9) compared with 26 letters. |
LTM is the third store, where information can be held for very long periods.
| Feature | Detail | Key Research |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | Potentially unlimited | No study has been able to measure the upper limit of LTM capacity |
| Duration | Up to a lifetime | Bahrick et al. (1975) — tested recall of high school classmates' names and faces. After 15 years, participants could identify 90% of names and faces from photographs. Even after 48 years, recognition was about 70%. Free recall was worse (about 30% after 48 years), but this still demonstrates very long-term storage. |
| Encoding | Primarily semantic (meaning-based) | Baddeley (1966) — found that recall of semantically similar words (e.g., big, large, great) from LTM was significantly impaired compared with semantically dissimilar words, suggesting LTM relies on semantic encoding. |
| Process | Description |
|---|---|
| Attention | Transfers information from the sensory register to STM; without attention, information is lost |
| Maintenance rehearsal | Repeating information to keep it in STM; prolonged rehearsal transfers it to LTM |
| Retrieval | Bringing information back from LTM into STM for conscious use |
Key Definition: Chunking is the process of combining individual items into larger, meaningful units (chunks) to increase the effective capacity of STM.
Miller (1956) demonstrated that while STM can hold approximately 7 items, the size of each item can vary. For example, the sequence "F-B-I-C-I-A-B-B-C" is 9 individual letters (exceeding STM capacity), but can be chunked into three meaningful units: "FBI," "CIA," "BBC" — well within STM capacity. Chunking relies on existing knowledge in LTM to create meaningful groups, which is why experts in a field can remember more domain-specific information than novices.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.