Applied Ethics: Euthanasia and Issues of Life and Death

Euthanasia — literally "good death" (from the Greek eu = good, thanatos = death) — is one of the most contested moral issues in contemporary ethics. The AQA A-Level specification requires you to understand the different types of euthanasia, the key ethical arguments for and against, and how the major ethical theories (natural moral law, utilitarianism, situation ethics, Kantian ethics) apply to this issue.

Key Definition: Euthanasia is the deliberate ending of a person's life in order to relieve suffering. It may be performed by the patient themselves (assisted suicide), by a doctor, or by a third party.

---

Types of Euthanasia

It is essential to distinguish between different types of euthanasia, as the ethical analysis varies significantly depending on the type.

Type	Description	Example
Voluntary	The patient competently requests death	A terminally ill patient asks a doctor to administer a lethal injection
Non-voluntary	The patient cannot consent (e.g., coma, severe brain injury)	Doctors withdraw life support from a patient in a persistent vegetative state
Involuntary	Death is imposed against the patient's wishes	Widely regarded as murder; virtually no ethicist defends this
Active	A deliberate act causes death	Administering a lethal drug
Passive	Death results from withholding or withdrawing treatment	Turning off a ventilator; not resuscitating

The distinction between active and passive euthanasia is morally significant for many ethicists. James Rachels (1941–2003) famously challenged this distinction in his 1975 article "Active and Passive Euthanasia," arguing that if the intention and outcome are the same, there is no morally relevant difference between killing and letting die.

---

Sanctity of Life

The sanctity of life principle holds that all human life is sacred and inviolable because it is created by God. This principle is central to Christian, Jewish, and Islamic teaching, and it provides one of the strongest arguments against euthanasia.

Key Definition: The sanctity of life is the belief that human life has intrinsic, God-given value that must be protected from conception to natural death. It is not for human beings to decide when life should end.

Biblical Foundations

• "So God created mankind in his own image" (Genesis 1:27) — human life has a unique dignity because humans are made in the image of God (imago Dei).
• "You shall not murder" (Exodus 20:13) — the Sixth Commandment is interpreted by many Christians as prohibiting euthanasia.
• "The Lord gave, and the Lord has taken away" (Job 1:21) — life and death are in God's hands, not ours.

The Catholic Position

The Catholic Church, drawing on natural moral law, firmly opposes all forms of active euthanasia. Pope John Paul II's encyclical Evangelium Vitae (1995) described euthanasia as "a grave violation of the law of God." However, the Catholic tradition does allow the withdrawal of "extraordinary" or disproportionate treatment when it merely prolongs the dying process without benefit.

---

Quality of Life

The quality of life principle holds that the value of a life should be assessed by its quality — the degree of happiness, autonomy, dignity, and freedom from suffering it contains. If quality has fallen below a certain threshold, euthanasia may be morally justified.

Key Definition: The quality of life principle holds that life's value depends on the subjective experience and objective conditions of the person living it. When quality becomes sufficiently poor, ending life may be a compassionate and morally defensible choice.

Evaluation (AO3):

• Strength: The quality of life principle respects individual autonomy and acknowledges that some forms of suffering are unbearable.
• Weakness: Quality of life is subjective and difficult to measure. Who decides when quality is too low? The concept risks devaluing the lives of disabled or elderly people.
• Weakness: Medical prognoses can be wrong. Patients deemed to have no quality of life have sometimes recovered or found new sources of meaning.

---

Natural Moral Law Approach

Applying Aquinas's natural moral law:

1. Primary precept — preservation of life: Euthanasia directly violates this precept. Life must be preserved, and deliberately ending life is always wrong.
2. Real vs apparent goods: A patient seeking euthanasia to escape suffering pursues an apparent good (relief from pain) at the expense of a real good (life itself).
3. Doctrine of double effect: A doctor may administer strong painkillers to a terminally ill patient, foreseeing that the drugs may shorten life, provided that:
   • The action itself is good or neutral (administering pain relief).
   • The intention is to relieve suffering, not to kill.
   • The bad effect (death) is foreseen but not intended.
   • There is a proportionate reason (severe, unmanageable pain).

This allows palliative sedation but prohibits active euthanasia. The doctrine of double effect is crucial for understanding the NML approach to end-of-life care.

---