You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Religious pluralism is the most radical of the three positions in the theology of religions. It holds that no single religion has a monopoly on truth or salvation — that the major world religions are equally valid paths to the divine, each offering authentic encounters with ultimate reality. The most influential advocate of pluralism is John Hick, whose "pluralistic hypothesis" has shaped the debate for decades. This lesson examines Hicks Copernican revolution in theology, Paul Knitters contributions, the controversial "Myth of Christian Uniqueness" thesis, and the major criticisms that have been levelled against pluralism.
John Hick (1922–2012) began his career as a fairly orthodox Christian philosopher but gradually moved toward pluralism through his engagement with other religions, particularly during his years in Birmingham, one of the most religiously diverse cities in Britain.
Hick described his proposal as a Copernican revolution in theology — analogous to the shift from the Ptolemaic (earth-centred) model of the solar system to the Copernican (sun-centred) model. Just as Copernicus showed that the Earth is not the centre of the solar system, Hick argued that Christianity is not the centre of the religious universe:
| Ptolemaic Theology | Copernican Theology |
|---|---|
| Christianity is at the centre; other religions orbit around it | God/the Real is at the centre; all religions orbit around it |
| Other religions have value only insofar as they relate to Christianity | All religions have independent value as responses to the Real |
| Salvation is through Christ alone | Salvation/liberation is available through multiple paths |
| Exclusivism and inclusivism | Pluralism |
Central to Hicks hypothesis is the distinction between **the Real an sich** (the Real in itself) and **the Real as humanly experienced**. Drawing on Kants distinction between the noumenon (the thing-in-itself) and the phenomenon (the thing as it appears to us), Hick argued that the ultimate divine reality — which he called "the Real" — is beyond all human categories and descriptions. No religion experiences the Real as it actually is; each religion experiences the Real as filtered through its own particular cultural, historical, and linguistic lens.
The personal deities of theistic religions (the God of Christianity, Allah in Islam, Vishnu in Hinduism) and the impersonal absolutes of non-theistic religions (Brahman, the Tao, Sunyata) are all personae and impersonae of the Real — different culturally conditioned manifestations of the same ultimate reality.
Key Definition: The Real — John Hick`s term for the ultimate divine reality that lies behind all religious traditions. The Real in itself transcends all human concepts and categories; different religions experience and describe different manifestations of the Real.
How do we evaluate religions if all are responses to the same Real? Hick proposed a soteriological criterion: religions should be judged by their fruits — by the degree to which they promote the transformation of human existence from self-centredness to Reality-centredness (or, in religious language, from sin to salvation, from samsara to moksha, from suffering to nirvana). By this criterion, Hick argued, the major world religions are roughly equally effective — no one tradition is demonstrably superior to the others in producing saints, moral exemplars, and transformed lives.
| Religion | Self-Centredness | Reality-Centredness |
|---|---|---|
| Christianity | Sin | Salvation through Christ |
| Islam | Submission to self | Submission to God (Islam) |
| Hinduism | Maya (illusion) | Moksha (liberation) |
| Buddhism | Dukkha (suffering) | Nirvana (liberation) |
Hicks pluralism requires the rejection of traditional Christology. If all religions are equally valid, then Christianitys central claim — that Jesus is the unique incarnation of God — must be reinterpreted. In The Myth of God Incarnate (1977), a controversial collection of essays edited by Hick, several scholars argued that the doctrine of the Incarnation should be understood as mythological rather than literal — a poetic, metaphorical way of expressing the significance of Jesus rather than a metaphysical claim about his nature.
For Hick, calling Jesus "Son of God" or "God incarnate" is similar to calling a particularly compassionate person "an angel" — it expresses the impact and significance of Jesus rather than making an ontological claim about his divine nature. Jesus was not literally God walking the earth; he was a human being who was exceptionally open to and transparent to the Real.
Paul Knitter (b. 1939), an American Catholic theologian, has developed his own version of pluralism that emphasises ethical praxis over theological doctrine.
In No Other Name? A Critical Survey of Christian Attitudes Toward the World Religions (1985), Knitter argued for a shift from Christocentrism (Christ at the centre) to theocentrism (God at the centre) to what he calls soteriocentrism (salvation/liberation at the centre). The primary question is not "which religion has the correct doctrine about God?" but "which religions are effectively promoting human liberation, justice, and the flourishing of all life?"
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.