You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Age is a significant but often overlooked dimension of identity. Sociologists argue that the meanings attached to different ages — childhood, youth, middle age, old age — are not simply biological facts but are socially constructed, varying across cultures and historical periods. This lesson examines how age identities are formed, experienced, and contested, with particular attention to youth subcultures, generational identity, ageism, and consumer identity.
Key Definition: Age identity refers to an individual's sense of self in relation to their age, and the cultural meanings, expectations, roles, and stereotypes associated with different age groups in a given society.
While ageing is a biological process, the social significance attached to different ages is culturally and historically variable:
Childhood: In medieval Europe, children were treated as "miniature adults" — they worked alongside adults, dressed in adult clothing, and were not seen as a distinct category requiring special protection. The modern concept of childhood as a separate, protected stage of life is a relatively recent invention. Philippe Ariès (1962), in Centuries of Childhood, argued that childhood as we know it is a social construction that emerged in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.
Youth/adolescence: The concept of "youth" or "adolescence" as a distinct life stage is largely a twentieth-century invention, linked to the expansion of education, the creation of a youth consumer market, and the delay of adult responsibilities (marriage, employment).
Old age: The meanings attached to old age vary dramatically across cultures. In some societies, elders are revered as sources of wisdom and authority; in contemporary Western societies, old age is often associated with decline, dependency, and social irrelevance.
Evaluation (AO3):
The Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies (CCCS) at the University of Birmingham, active in the 1970s and 1980s, produced the most influential body of work on youth subcultures. Key figures included Stuart Hall, Phil Cohen, Dick Hebdige, and Paul Willis.
The CCCS argued that post-war youth subcultures — teddy boys, mods, rockers, skinheads, punks, rastas — were symbolic forms of class resistance. Working-class youth used distinctive styles (clothing, music, language, ritual) to express opposition to, or negotiate with, their class position.
| Subculture | Period | Key Features | CCCS Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teddy boys | 1950s | Edwardian suits, rock and roll | Reclaiming upper-class style to assert working-class pride |
| Mods | 1960s | Sharp suits, scooters, soul music | Aspiration, mobility, and upward mobility in consumer culture |
| Skinheads | Late 1960s | Boots, braces, cropped hair | Symbolic attempt to recover disappearing working-class community |
| Punks | 1970s | Safety pins, torn clothing, mohawks | Symbolic refusal of consumer society; DIY ethos |
| Rastas | 1970s-80s | Dreadlocks, reggae, Afrocentric identity | Resistance to racism and colonial identity |
Hebdige (1979), in Subculture: The Meaning of Style, argued that subcultural style is a form of "semiotic guerrilla warfare" — using signs, symbols, and objects in unexpected ways to challenge dominant meanings.
Evaluation (AO3):
Sarah Thornton (1995), in Club Cultures, challenged the CCCS approach and argued that contemporary youth cultures are better understood through the concept of "subcultural capital" (adapted from Bourdieu's cultural capital). Subcultural capital refers to the knowledge, style, and connections that confer status within a particular youth scene.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.