You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
When theta is small (measured in radians), the trigonometric functions can be approximated by simpler expressions. These approximations are given in the Edexcel formula booklet and are tested at A-Level (9MA0).
For small theta (in radians):
sin(theta) ≈ theta
cos(theta) ≈ 1 - theta²/2
tan(theta) ≈ theta
These become more accurate as theta approaches 0.
| Function | Approximation | Why it works |
|---|---|---|
| sin(theta) | theta | The sine curve is almost linear near the origin |
| cos(theta) | 1 - theta²/2 | This is the start of the Taylor series for cosine |
| tan(theta) | theta | For small angles, tan ≈ sin ≈ theta |
| theta (radians) | sin(theta) | theta | cos(theta) | 1 - theta²/2 | tan(theta) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.01 | 0.009999833 | 0.01 | 0.99995 | 0.99995 | 0.01000003 |
| 0.1 | 0.09983 | 0.1 | 0.99500 | 0.99500 | 0.10033 |
| 0.2 | 0.19867 | 0.2 | 0.98007 | 0.98000 | 0.20271 |
| 0.5 | 0.47943 | 0.5 | 0.87758 | 0.87500 | 0.54630 |
The approximations are very good for theta < 0.1 and reasonable for theta < 0.3.
Use small angle approximations to estimate sin(0.05).
sin(0.05) ≈ 0.05
Calculator: sin(0.05) = 0.04998... Very close.
Use small angle approximations to estimate cos(0.1).
cos(0.1) ≈ 1 - (0.1)²/2 = 1 - 0.005 = 0.995
Calculator: cos(0.1) = 0.99500... Exact to 5 d.p.
Show that for small theta, (1 - cos(theta))/theta² ≈ 1/2.
Using cos(theta) ≈ 1 - theta²/2:
(1 - cos(theta))/theta² ≈ (1 - (1 - theta²/2))/theta²
= (theta²/2)/theta²
= 1/2
For small theta, simplify (sin(3theta))/(theta).
sin(3theta) ≈ 3theta (since 3theta is also small)
(sin(3theta))/(theta) ≈ 3theta/theta = 3
For small x, find an approximate expression for (tan(2x) - sin(x))/(x²).
tan(2x) ≈ 2x
sin(x) ≈ x
(2x - x)/x² = x/x² = 1/x
Hmm, this approaches infinity as x tends to 0, which suggests we need higher-order terms.
Let me redo this more carefully:
tan(2x) ≈ 2x + (2x)³/3 + ... ≈ 2x (to first order) sin(x) ≈ x - x³/6 + ... ≈ x (to first order)
To first order: (2x - x)/x² = x/x² = 1/x, which is not finite.
Actually, let me reconsider. The correct approach:
tan(2x) ≈ 2x (first-order small angle approximation) sin(x) ≈ x
(tan(2x) - sin(x))/x² ≈ (2x - x)/x² = x/x² = 1/x
This expression tends to infinity as x tends to 0, which is correct — the function is not bounded near 0.
For small theta, approximate (sin(theta) x tan(theta))/(1 - cos(theta)).
sin(theta) ≈ theta tan(theta) ≈ theta 1 - cos(theta) ≈ theta²/2
(theta x theta)/(theta²/2) = theta²/(theta²/2) = 2
Find an approximate solution to sin(x) + cos(x) = 1.1 for small positive x.
x + (1 - x²/2) = 1.1
x + 1 - x²/2 = 1.1
x - x²/2 = 0.1
x²/2 - x + 0.1 = 0
x² - 2x + 0.2 = 0
x = (2 ± sqrt(4 - 0.8))/2 = (2 ± sqrt(3.2))/2
x = (2 - 1.789)/2 = 0.106 (taking the smaller root for small x)
x ≈ 0.106 radians
Check: sin(0.106) + cos(0.106) ≈ 0.1058 + 0.9944 = 1.100. Confirmed.
| Tip | Detail |
|---|---|
| Radians only | These approximations only work in radians, not degrees |
| State the approximation | Always write "for small theta, sin(theta) ≈ theta" etc. before using |
| Higher order | For cos, the approximation 1 - theta²/2 includes the second-order term |
| Combine carefully | When simplifying fractions, use the right level of approximation |
| Verify | Check your approximate answer against the exact value when possible |
Edexcel 9MA0-02 specification section 5 — Trigonometry, sub-strand 5.9 covers the standard small angle approximations sinθ≈θ, cosθ≈1−2θ2 and tanθ≈θ, where θ is measured in radians and is small (refer to the official specification document for exact wording). Although examined as Year 1 Pure content, the material extends through Year 2 calculus (where the limit limx→0sinx/x=1 underpins the derivative dxdsinx=cosx) and into the Further Mathematics Maclaurin/Taylor series treatment. Synoptic links to Pure include section 7 (Differentiation, where the small-angle limits provide the first-principles justification of the derivatives of sine and cosine), section 8 (Integration, where small-angle expansions yield approximate values of integrals such as ∫00.1sinxdx) and section 5 itself (radian measure, since the approximations are only valid in radians — substituting degrees gives nonsense). Beyond Pure, the result reappears in mechanics for the simple-pendulum derivation T≈2πL/g, which linearises sinθ≈θ in the equation of motion.
Question (8 marks):
(a) Use the small-angle approximations for sinθ and tanθ to show that, for small x, x3sin3x−tan3x≈−227. (5)
(b) Hence, or otherwise, find the value of limx→0x3sin3x−tan3x. (3)
Solution with mark scheme:
(a) Step 1 — replace sin3x to sufficient order.
The small-angle approximation sinθ≈θ−6θ3 (the Maclaurin expansion to order three) gives, with θ=3x, sin3x≈3x−6(3x)3=3x−627x3=3x−29x3.
M1 — using sinθ≈θ extended to the next non-zero term −θ3/6. The Edexcel specification quotes only sinθ≈θ, but to evaluate a limit of order x3 the next term is required; this is where Year 2/Further Maths techniques bite. Common error: candidates use only sin3x≈3x, which leaves a numerator of 3x−3x=0 and produces the indeterminate form 0/x3 — they then have nothing to work with.
Step 2 — replace tan3x to sufficient order.
The expansion tanθ≈θ+3θ3 (also Maclaurin to order three) gives tan3x≈3x+3(3x)3=3x+327x3=3x+9x3.
M1 — extending tanθ≈θ to its third-order term +θ3/3. Note the plus sign, contrasting with the minus on sinθ: confusing the two is one of the most frequent errors at this level.
Step 3 — subtract.
sin3x−tan3x≈(3x−29x3)−(3x+9x3)=−29x3−9x3=−29x3+18x3=−227x3.
A1 — correct simplified numerator −227x3. The leading 3x terms cancel exactly; the surviving terms are both of order x3, so the cancellation occurs at the right place to produce a finite limit.
Step 4 — divide.
x3sin3x−tan3x≈x3−227x3=−227.
M1 — dividing through by x3 (valid since we are working with the leading-order expansion and x=0 in the limit process).
A1 — final stated result −227, matching the printed form.
(b) Step 1 — interpret part (a) as a limit statement.
Because the higher-order remainders are O(x5) for sin3x and O(x5) for tan3x, the error in the approximation −227 is itself of order x2 (after dividing by x3). As x→0 this error vanishes.
M1 — recognising that the approximation becomes exact in the limit because the discarded terms are higher-order.
Step 2 — state the limit.
limx→0x3sin3x−tan3x=−227.
M1 — writing the limit explicitly using the approximation result.
A1 — exact value −227, equivalent to −13.5 but presented as a fraction since "exact" is implied.
Total: 8 marks (M5 A3, split as shown).
Question (6 marks): Given that θ is small (measured in radians):
(a) Show, using small-angle approximations, that θsinθcos2θ−1≈−2. (4)
(b) Hence, or otherwise, evaluate limθ→0θsinθcos2θ−1. (2)
Mark scheme decomposition by AO:
(a)
(b)
Total: 6 marks split AO1 = 4, AO2 = 2. This question is AO1-led (procedural application of the standard approximations) but the final A mark in (a) and the M1 in (b) reward AO2 reasoning — specifically, justifying that the approximation captures the exact limiting value rather than merely an "approximate" one. Edexcel small-angle questions repeatedly carry this hidden AO2 weight: the routine substitution earns most marks, but the limit-justification mark separates A* from A.
Connects to:
Year 2 Pure / Further Maths — Maclaurin and Taylor series: the standard small-angle approximations are the first non-zero terms of the Maclaurin series sinθ=θ−6θ3+120θ5−⋯ and cosθ=1−2θ2+24θ4−⋯. Recognising the approximations as truncated series clarifies why the cosine approximation needs the θ2/2 correction (the θ coefficient is zero) while the sine approximation can drop straight to θ.
Section 7 — limit definition of the derivative: the derivative dxdsinx=cosx is proved from first principles by writing hsin(x+h)−sinx=sinx⋅hcosh−1+cosx⋅hsinh and invoking limh→0sinh/h=1 together with limh→0(cosh−1)/h=0 — both of which follow directly from the small-angle approximations.
Mechanics — pendulum and SHM: the equation of motion for a simple pendulum is θ¨=−(g/L)sinθ. This is not simple harmonic motion until the small-angle approximation sinθ≈θ linearises it to θ¨=−(g/L)θ, giving the standard period T≈2πL/g. The whole "pendulum clock" calculation depends on this single approximation.
Numerical analysis / computer graphics: real-time graphics engines often replace sinθ and cosθ with their truncated Taylor expansions for small rotation increments because polynomial evaluation is much cheaper than calling a transcendental function. The error bound O(θ3) for sine and O(θ4) for cosine is what makes this engineering trade-off acceptable.
Optics — paraxial lens equation: Snell's law n1sinθ1=n2sinθ2 is intractable in general, but for paraxial (near-axis) rays the approximation sinθ≈θ linearises Snell to n1θ1=n2θ2, from which the entire thin-lens equation u1+v1=f1 is derived. School-level optics is, mathematically, the small-angle approximation.
Small-angle questions on 9MA0-02 split AO marks more evenly than surd questions, because the topic genuinely tests reasoning as well as procedure:
| AO | Typical share | Earned by |
|---|---|---|
| AO1 (knowledge / procedure) | 50–60% | Stating and substituting the standard approximations correctly; expanding to higher orders when required |
| AO2 (reasoning / interpretation) | 30–40% | Justifying why a given approximation is sufficient; identifying that radians (not degrees) are required; interpreting an approximation as a limit |
| AO3 (problem-solving) | 0–15% | Applying approximations in unfamiliar contexts (limits, integrals, mechanics) where the technique must be selected, not signalled |
Examiner-rewarded phrasing: "for θ in radians and small, applying the small-angle approximation sinθ≈θ"; "since the discarded terms are of order θ3, the relative error is O(θ2)"; "in the limit θ→0 the higher-order terms vanish, hence the approximation gives the exact value of the limit". Phrases that lose marks: "for small θ, sinθ=θ" (using equals instead of approximately equals); "applying sinθ≈θ" without the radians qualifier on a question where degrees might be implied; or — most damagingly — using cosθ≈1 when the question requires θ2/2 accuracy.
A specific Edexcel pattern to watch: questions of the form "find limx→0f(x)/g(x)" where both numerator and denominator vanish to leading order. The mark scheme typically requires expansion to one order beyond the obvious — the leading-order cancellation is the question, not the answer. Reading the limit-form clue and matching the order of expansion to the order of cancellation is the AO2 skill being assessed.
Question: Use the small-angle approximation cosθ≈1−2θ2 to estimate cos0.1 to 4 decimal places, where 0.1 is in radians. Compare your answer with the calculator value.
Grade C response (~210 words):
Using cosθ≈1−2θ2 with θ=0.1:
cos0.1≈1−2(0.1)2=1−20.01=1−0.005=0.9950.
The calculator gives cos0.1=0.99500…, so the approximation matches to 4 decimal places.
Examiner commentary: Full marks (3/3). The candidate substitutes correctly, simplifies cleanly, and reports the answer to the requested precision. The comparison with the calculator value confirms the result and demonstrates self-checking. The radian implication of the question is honoured implicitly (the candidate does not convert to degrees). This is the standard Grade C answer for a procedural application question — the maths is right, the working is shown, and the precision matches the question's demand. A common error at this level is to compute θ2/2 as 0.05 instead of 0.005, dropping a power of ten; another is to write 0.995 instead of 0.9950 and lose the accuracy mark for not matching 4 d.p. Neither slip occurs here.
Grade A response (~290 words):*
Apply the small-angle approximation cosθ≈1−2θ2, valid for θ in radians and small. With θ=0.1 rad:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.