You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
An Inspector Calls is fundamentally a play about social responsibility — the idea that we all have a duty to look after one another. Closely connected to this is the theme of class — the rigid social hierarchy that allows the Birlings to exploit Eva Smith without consequence. These two themes are at the heart of every GCSE question on the play.
Social responsibility is the belief that individuals and communities have an obligation to act in the best interests of society as a whole, not just themselves. Priestley contrasts two opposing views:
| Birling's view (individualism) | The Inspector's view (collectivism) |
|---|---|
| "a man has to mind his own business and look after himself and his own" | "We are members of one body. We are responsible for each other" |
| Each person is responsible only for themselves | Everyone is connected; what we do affects others |
| The poor are responsible for their own poverty | The privileged have a duty to the vulnerable |
| Charity is optional and a matter of personal choice | Social justice is a moral imperative |
| Character | Response to social responsibility |
|---|---|
| Mr Birling | Rejects it entirely — "If we were all responsible for everything that happened to everybody ... it would be very awkward" |
| Mrs Birling | Rejects it — "I accept no blame for it at all" |
| Sheila | Accepts it — "I know I'm to blame — and I'm desperately sorry" |
| Eric | Accepts it — "We did her in all right" |
| Gerald | Partially accepts, then retreats — helps disprove the Inspector |
| Inspector | Demands it — "We are members of one body" |
Priestley structures the entire play around the question: are we responsible for each other?
Examiner's tip: Social responsibility is relevant to almost every question on the play. Even if the question asks about a specific character or theme, you can nearly always connect your answer back to social responsibility.
One of Priestley's most powerful structural choices is the chain of responsibility. Each family member is linked to Eva's death:
Mr Birling (sacks her) → Sheila (has her dismissed) → Gerald (uses and abandons her)
→ Eric (assaults her, gets her pregnant) → Mrs Birling (refuses her help)
↓
Eva's suicide
No single character killed Eva — they all contributed. This is Priestley's point: social responsibility is collective. We cannot say "it wasn't just me" because we are all interconnected.
Examiner's tip: The chain structure mirrors the Inspector's message — "We are members of one body." Each person's actions had consequences for Eva, just as each member of society affects the lives of others.
In Edwardian England, class was rigid, pervasive, and largely unchallenged by the upper classes:
| Class | Examples in the play | Attitude to those below them |
|---|---|---|
| Upper class | Gerald Croft, his parents | Entitled; assume leadership is natural |
| Upper middle class | The Birling family | Aspiring; desperate to rise further |
| Working class | Eva Smith, Edna (the maid) | Exploited; invisible; disposable |
Priestley exposes the class system as unjust, cruel, and self-serving:
1. Mr Birling treats workers as commodities
"If you don't come down sharply on some of these people, they'd soon be asking for the earth" (Act 1)
Eva asked for a pay rise of two and a half shillings — a modest request. Birling sacked her and the other strikers because he sees workers as expendable.
2. Mrs Birling uses class as a weapon
"Girls of that class" (Act 2)
Mrs Birling dismisses Eva because of her class — she cannot believe a working-class girl deserves the same consideration as someone of Mrs Birling's own status.
3. Sheila exploits her class privilege unconsciously
Sheila had Eva sacked from Milwards by leveraging her family's status as customers. She did not think about the consequences for Eva because, as a privileged young woman, she had never had to think about what it means to lose a job.
4. Gerald's "rescue" reinforces class hierarchy
Gerald's relationship with Eva was defined by class — he had money, a home, and power; she had nothing. Even when he was kind, the relationship was one of dependency, not equality.
5. Eric's behaviour reveals class entitlement
Eric assumed he could force his way into Eva's lodgings because his class status gave him a sense of entitlement over working-class women.
Working-class women like Eva faced a double disadvantage — exploited both because of their class and because of their gender:
| As a working-class person | As a woman |
|---|---|
| Low wages, no job security, no safety net | Could not vote, limited legal rights |
| Easily sacked with no recourse | Few employment options outside factories/shops |
| Invisible to the upper classes | Vulnerable to sexual exploitation |
| No access to charity if deemed "undeserving" | Reputation was everything — easily destroyed |
Eva's tragedy is the intersection of class and gender oppression. She is exploited as a worker (by Birling), as a consumer (by Sheila), as a woman (by Gerald and Eric), and as a supplicant (by Mrs Birling).
Priestley uses the play to argue that the class system is not just unfair but morally indefensible:
Examiner's tip: When writing about class, always connect it to Priestley's purpose. He is not simply describing the class system — he is attacking it. The play is a call to action for the 1945 audience to build a more equal society.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.