You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
In the GCSE English Literature exam, you will be given an extract from Blood Brothers and asked to analyse it in detail, linking it to the wider play. This lesson covers the key extracts you should prepare, the skills the examiner is looking for, and model paragraph structures.
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Board | WJEC / Eduqas (most common for Blood Brothers) |
| Time recommended | Approximately 45–50 minutes |
| Extract provided? | Yes — you will be given a specific passage |
| Wider play references needed? | Yes — you must link to the rest of the play |
| AO weightings | AO1 (response), AO2 (language/form/structure), AO4 (context) |
Examiner's tip: Unlike the AQA Shakespeare question, Blood Brothers on WJEC/Eduqas does not have a separate AO3 weighting — context is assessed through AO4. Check your specific exam board, as the format varies. Regardless, always integrate context into your analysis.
Context: Mrs Lyons persuades Mrs Johnstone to give up one of her twins.
MRS LYONS: "With one died and died and you couldn't even see him... And there's me with none... If... if we could make a deal..."
Key analysis points:
Wider play links:
Context: Mickey and Eddie, aged seven, perform a blood brothers ceremony after becoming friends.
MICKEY: "I'll cross me heart and hope to die... that I shall always defend my brother"
Key analysis points:
Wider play links:
Context: A policeman visits both families after the boys are caught misbehaving.
Key analysis points:
Wider play links:
Context: Mickey has been laid off from his factory job during the recession.
Key analysis points:
Wider play links:
Context: Mickey confronts Eddie with a gun. Mrs Johnstone reveals the truth.
MRS JOHNSTONE: "Mickey... don't shoot Eddie... He's your brother... You're twins!" MICKEY: "Why didn't you give me away?... I could have been him!"
Key analysis points:
Wider play links:
Use the PEAL structure for each paragraph:
| Step | What to Do | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Point | Make a clear analytical point | Russell uses the policeman scene to expose class bias in British institutions. |
| Evidence | Provide a short, embedded quotation | The policeman speaks to Mrs Johnstone in a "threatening" manner but is "deferential" to Mr Lyons. |
| Analysis | Analyse language, form, structure; explain why | The shift in register — from aggression to politeness — dramatises how the same behaviour is criminalised in working-class children and excused in middle-class ones. |
| Link | Link to the wider play, context, or another theme | This institutional bias foreshadows Mickey's imprisonment, where the criminal justice system again punishes working-class desperation while middle-class privilege protects Eddie. |
Russell uses the policeman scene to expose the institutional class bias that pervades British society. When the policeman visits the Johnstone household, he speaks in an aggressive, threatening register — warning Mrs Johnstone that her children will "end up in court." However, when he visits the Lyons household for the same offence, his register shifts to one of polite deference, treating the incident as a harmless childhood prank. This juxtaposition is Russell's most direct dramatisation of how the same behaviour is criminalised or excused depending on class. The adjective "threatening" in the stage directions when the policeman addresses Mrs Johnstone contrasts sharply with the "pleasant" tone he adopts with Mr Lyons, revealing that the institutions of society — police, courts, schools — are not neutral but actively reinforce class division. This scene foreshadows Mickey's later imprisonment, where the criminal justice system again punishes working-class desperation while Eddie's middle-class privilege continues to protect him. In the context of 1980s Britain, Russell's audience would have recognised this as a reflection of the real class biases embedded in British policing — particularly in Liverpool, where tensions between working-class communities and the police were acute.
| Mistake | Why It Loses Marks |
|---|---|
| Retelling the plot | The examiner knows the story — they want analysis |
| Feature-spotting without analysis | Naming a technique without explaining its effect |
| Ignoring the extract | You must analyse the specific passage given |
| Only discussing the extract | You must also link to the wider play |
| Bolting on context | Context should be woven into analysis, not added as a separate section |
| Using long quotations | Short embedded quotes (2–6 words) are more effective |
| Writing without a plan | Unstructured essays score lower |
| Not addressing the question | Every paragraph should link back to the question asked |
Read the extract where Mickey and Eddie first meet. Write two PEAL paragraphs analysing how Russell presents the friendship between the boys.
Read the extract where the policeman visits both households. Write two PEAL paragraphs analysing how Russell presents class inequality.
Read the final scene. Write a full essay analysing how Russell presents the theme of class in this extract and in the play as a whole.
Success in the Blood Brothers exam requires you to analyse the specific extract while linking to the wider play. Use PEAL paragraphs, embed short quotations, analyse language and structure at word level, and integrate context into your arguments. The examiner wants to see that you understand not just what happens in the play but why Russell makes the choices he makes — and the answer always connects to class, inequality, and social determinism.
It is worth understanding how an AQA examiner actually assesses a response. They are reading with four lenses operating simultaneously:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.