Question 4: Critical Evaluation

Question 4 is the highest-tariff question in Section A, worth 20 marks. It tests your ability to evaluate a text critically and support your evaluation with textual references. This is assessed under AO4 and requires you to engage with a given statement, deciding to what extent you agree or disagree with it.

---

What the Question Looks Like

A typical Q4 might read:

Focus this part of your answer on the second part of the source, from line 20 to the end. A student said: "The writer makes the reader feel great sympathy for the main character." To what extent do you agree?

The question always includes:

• A focus area (specific line references)
• A statement from a student or reader
• The prompt "To what extent do you agree?"

---

What the Examiner Wants

Requirement	Explanation
Engage with the statement	Show that you are responding to the given statement, not just writing generally about the text
Evaluate critically	Make judgements about the text — do you agree, disagree, or partially agree?
Support with textual references	Use quotations to support your evaluation
Analyse language AND/OR structure	You can comment on both, but your main focus should be on evaluating the writer's methods
Show perceptive understanding	For top marks, demonstrate sophisticated, insightful reading

---

How to Structure Your Answer

You should aim to write 3–4 well-developed paragraphs in about 25 minutes. A strong structure is:

flowchart TD
  Q[Read the statement carefully] --> P[Decide your position]
  P --> A["Para 1: Agree<br/>quotation + analysis + evaluative language"]
  A --> B["Para 2: Agree further or new method<br/>close word-level analysis"]
  B --> C["Para 3: Refine / partial disagreement<br/>alternative interpretation"]
  C --> D["Para 4: Conclusion<br/>’Overall, I largely agree...’"]
  D --> L4["Level 4: 17–20 marks<br/>perceptive, judicious, critical"]

Paragraph 1: Agree with the Statement

• Select a quotation that supports the statement.
• Analyse how the writer's methods create the effect described in the statement.
• Use evaluative language: "I agree that the writer effectively creates sympathy because..."

Paragraph 2: Agree Further (or Add Nuance)

• Select another quotation that supports the statement, or explore a different method.
• Develop your evaluation with close word-level analysis.
• Consider the reader's response in detail.

Paragraph 3: Partial Disagreement or Alternative Interpretation

• Find a quotation or moment where the effect described in the statement is less convincing or absent.
• Explain why this complicates a simple agreement.
• This shows sophisticated thinking and moves you into the top level.

Paragraph 4 (Optional): Conclusion

• Briefly summarise your overall evaluation.
• "Overall, I largely agree that... although the writer also..."

---

Evaluative Language

To access the top marks, you need to use evaluative language — phrases that show you are making a judgement, not just describing:

Instead of...	Use...
"The writer uses a metaphor"	"The writer effectively uses a metaphor to create..."
"This shows the character is sad"	"This powerfully conveys the character's sadness because..."
"The writer describes the storm"	"The writer convincingly evokes the ferocity of the storm..."

Key evaluative words and phrases:

• effectively, powerfully, convincingly, successfully, compellingly
• to a great extent, I agree that, the writer achieves this by, this is particularly effective because
• however, it could also be argued that, this is less convincing when, the effect is undermined by

---

The Mark Scheme

Level	Descriptor	Marks
4	Perceptive, detailed evaluation; judicious examples; analyses effects convincingly	16–20
3	Clear, relevant evaluation; appropriate references; clearly explains effects	11–15
2	Some evaluation; some relevant references; attempts to explain effects	6–10
1	Simple, limited comments; references to the text are general	1–5

What Separates the Levels

• Level 1–2: You describe what happens or identify techniques without evaluating them.
• Level 3: You clearly evaluate and explain how the writer's methods achieve the effect in the statement.
• Level 4: You evaluate perceptively, exploring multiple layers of meaning, considering alternative interpretations, and selecting judicious (well-chosen) quotations.

---

Model Answer (Excerpt)

Statement: "The writer makes the reader feel sympathy for the main character."

Extract: "She pressed her back against the cold wall, pulling her thin coat tighter around her shoulders. The other children ran past, their laughter a language she had never learned to speak. She watched them go, her fingers tracing the cracked plaster beside her."

Answer (paragraph 1):

I strongly agree that the writer creates sympathy for the main character. The image of her pressing "her back against the cold wall" immediately positions her as isolated and uncomfortable. The adjective "cold" has dual connotations — it describes the literal temperature of the wall but also suggests emotional coldness, implying she receives no warmth or affection from her surroundings. The verb "pressed" suggests she is trying to make herself smaller, perhaps to go unnoticed, which creates a poignant image of a child who does not feel she belongs.

Answer (paragraph 2):

The writer deepens the reader's sympathy through the metaphor of laughter as "a language she had never learned to speak." This is particularly effective because it presents the other children's joy and social connection as something fundamentally foreign to her — not merely something she lacks in the moment, but something she has never experienced. The word "never" is absolute and devastating; it implies a lifetime of exclusion. The reader is made to feel that her isolation is not temporary but deeply ingrained, which intensifies our compassion.

Answer (paragraph 3):

However, the writer also imbues the character with a quiet dignity that complicates simple sympathy. She "watched them go" without calling out or crying — she does not seek pity. Her "fingers tracing the cracked plaster" is a small, self-contained gesture that suggests she has found her own way of coping, however fragile. The "cracked plaster" mirrors her own emotional state — damaged but still holding together. This prevents the reader from feeling mere pity; instead, the writer creates a more complex sympathy that includes admiration for her resilience.

---

Common Mistakes

Mistake	Why It Costs Marks
Not engaging with the statement	You must refer to the statement and say whether you agree or not
Only agreeing — never exploring alternative views	Nuanced evaluation is needed for top marks
Writing about language without evaluating	Q4 is about evaluation, not just analysis
Not using evaluative language	Phrases like "effectively," "convincingly," "to a great extent" show evaluation
Spending too little time	Q4 is worth 20 marks — dedicate at least 25 minutes