You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The First World War (1914–1918) had a devastating impact on Germany. The war brought military defeat, economic collapse, revolution, and the end of the Kaiser's rule. Understanding these events is essential because they explain why the Weimar Republic was created and why it faced such enormous problems from the very beginning. This is a key topic for the AQA GCSE History specification.
At the outbreak of war in August 1914, there was widespread enthusiasm in Germany. Most Germans believed the war would be short and victorious. The Schlieffen Plan aimed to defeat France quickly, then turn east to fight Russia.
| Phase | Detail |
|---|---|
| 1914 | The Schlieffen Plan failed; the Western Front became bogged down in trench warfare; the war became a stalemate |
| 1916 | The Battle of Verdun and the Battle of the Somme caused massive casualties on all sides |
| 1917 | The US entered the war against Germany; Russia withdrew after the Bolshevik Revolution, briefly giving Germany an advantage on the Eastern Front |
| 1918 | Germany's Spring Offensive (March 1918) failed; the Allied counter-attack pushed German forces back; Germany's allies (Austria-Hungary, Ottoman Empire) collapsed |
Britain imposed a naval blockade of Germany from 1914, preventing food and supplies from reaching German ports.
| Effect of the Blockade | Detail |
|---|---|
| Food shortages | By 1916, Germany faced severe food shortages; the winter of 1916–1917 was known as the "Turnip Winter" because turnips replaced bread and potatoes as the main food |
| Malnutrition | An estimated 750,000 German civilians died from malnutrition and related diseases during the war |
| Rationing | Strict rationing was introduced but was widely resented; a black market flourished |
| Morale | Civilian morale collapsed; strikes and protests increased, especially from 1917 onwards |
Exam Tip: The naval blockade is often overlooked but was crucial in undermining German morale and contributing to defeat. Link it to civilian suffering, falling morale, and the eventual revolution of 1918.
At the start of the war, all political parties — including the SPD — agreed to a political truce called the Burgfrieden ("castle peace"). They set aside their differences to support the war effort.
However, as the war dragged on:
From 1916, Germany was effectively run as a military dictatorship by Generals Paul von Hindenburg and Erich Ludendorff.
Exam Tip: This is crucial for understanding the "stab in the back" myth (Dolchstosslegende). The military engineered it so that civilians — not generals — would sign the armistice. This allowed right-wing nationalists to blame the "November Criminals" for Germany's defeat, even though the military had admitted the war was lost.
In late October and November 1918, revolution swept across Germany.
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 29 October 1918 | Naval mutiny at Kiel — sailors refused to carry out a suicidal attack on the British navy |
| 3–8 November 1918 | Revolution spread across Germany; workers' and soldiers' councils took control of cities; the King of Bavaria abdicated |
| 9 November 1918 | Kaiser Wilhelm II abdicated (gave up the throne) and fled to the Netherlands |
| 9 November 1918 | Friedrich Ebert (SPD leader) became Chancellor; Philipp Scheidemann declared Germany a republic |
| 11 November 1918 | The Armistice was signed; the war ended at 11am |
After the war, right-wing politicians and military leaders spread the myth that Germany had not been defeated on the battlefield but had been "stabbed in the back" by:
This was a lie — the German army had been defeated militarily, and Ludendorff himself had demanded an armistice. However, the myth was widely believed and was later used by Adolf Hitler and the Nazis to attack the Weimar Republic.
Exam Tip: The "stab in the back" myth is one of the most important concepts in this course. It explains why many Germans hated the Weimar Republic from the start and why they were attracted to parties like the Nazis that promised to reverse the humiliation of 1918.
| Statistic | Detail |
|---|---|
| Military deaths | Approximately 2 million German soldiers killed |
| Wounded | Approximately 4.2 million wounded |
| Civilian deaths | Approximately 750,000 died from the effects of the blockade |
| Economic damage | Germany's national debt increased from 5 billion marks to 150 billion marks |
| Psychological impact | A generation traumatised by war; widespread bitterness and a desire for revenge |
Question: Which was more important in destroying the German Empire in 1918: military defeat on the Western Front, or the collapse of civilian morale under the blockade?
Model Level 4/5 paragraph:
Military defeat was the immediate trigger for the collapse of the Kaiserreich, but civilian morale had been eroding for two years before it became decisive. Ludendorff's Spring Offensive (March–July 1918) represented Germany's last strategic gamble, and its failure allowed the Allied Hundred Days Offensive from 8 August — the "black day of the German army" — to break the Western Front. By 29 September 1918, Ludendorff told the Kaiser that an armistice was urgent, deliberately engineering a civilian signature so that the army would escape blame. However, the reason this demand could produce revolution rather than controlled transition was the prior collapse of civilian morale. The British blockade reduced daily calorie intake from 1,500 to below 1,000 by the Turnip Winter of 1916–17, killing roughly 750,000 civilians and triggering the April 1917 munitions strike in which 200,000 Berlin workers walked out. The Kiel mutiny of 29 October 1918 was the structural consequence of this collapse: sailors refused a suicidal final sortie because the moral legitimacy of the war had already evaporated. On balance, military defeat was the catalyst, but civilian exhaustion determined that defeat would take the form of revolution rather than managed transition — and that the Kaiser's throne would be swept away rather than reformed. Sustained reasoning therefore treats the two factors as linked causation rather than rivals.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.