You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The Harrying of the North (winter 1069–1070) was the most brutal and controversial act of William the Conqueror's reign. In response to the northern rebellions, William systematically devastated a vast area of northern England, destroying crops, livestock, and villages. The consequences were catastrophic and long-lasting.
The north of England had been a persistent source of resistance. The region had strong Viking and Danish connections and resented southern rule even before the Normans arrived.
The key trigger was the Rising of the North in 1069, when English rebels, supported by a Danish fleet, attacked York and destroyed both Norman castles, killing the garrisons.
William's previous responses — marching north, building castles, accepting submissions — had failed to end northern resistance permanently. He decided that only a campaign of total destruction would break the north's will to resist.
Key Term: The word "harrying" means to lay waste, to ravage and destroy. It implies a deliberate, systematic campaign of destruction rather than a single battle.
In the winter of 1069–1070, William marched his army through Yorkshire, Durham, Cheshire, Shropshire, Staffordshire, and Derbyshire, systematically destroying everything in his path.
| Method | Detail |
|---|---|
| Burning crops | Stored grain and standing crops were burned, ensuring there would be no food for the coming year |
| Killing livestock | Cattle, sheep, and horses were slaughtered. Plough teams (oxen) were killed, making future farming impossible |
| Destroying villages | Homes, barns, and farm buildings were burned to the ground |
| Salting the earth | Some sources claim the Normans salted farmland to prevent future cultivation, although this is disputed |
| Destroying tools | Ploughs, mills, and other agricultural equipment were smashed |
| Killing inhabitants | Men, women, and children were killed. Those who escaped fled to the hills and forests |
flowchart LR
A[Rising of the North 1069] --> B[Norman garrison at York killed]
B --> C[Danish fleet 240 ships in Humber]
C --> D[William pays Danes to leave]
D --> E[Harrying winter 1069-1070]
E --> F[Burn crops]
E --> G[Slaughter livestock and oxen]
E --> H[Destroy villages and tools]
E --> I[Kill inhabitants]
F --> J[Famine and cannibalism]
G --> J
H --> K[Land left waste for years]
I --> L[Refugees flee south]
J --> M[Domesday 1086: 60% Yorkshire waste]
K --> M
L --> M
The scale of the Harrying was immense. The area affected stretched from the Humber to the Tees and westward into Cheshire and Staffordshire — an area covering thousands of square miles.
The Domesday Book, compiled 16 years later, provides stark evidence of the Harrying's impact. In Yorkshire, huge numbers of manors were recorded as "waste" — meaning they had no economic value and were uninhabited or unproductive.
| Area | Percentage of Manors Recorded as Waste (1086) |
|---|---|
| Yorkshire | Over 60% of manors listed as wholly or partly waste |
| North Riding | Some areas had 80–90% waste |
| Cheshire | Significant areas of waste |
| Derbyshire | Scattered waste entries |
The fact that much of this land was still recorded as "waste" 16 years later demonstrates the severity and lasting impact of the Harrying.
Contemporary chroniclers painted a horrifying picture of the suffering caused by the Harrying.
Orderic Vitalis was a Norman monk writing in the early 12th century. Despite being Norman, he was deeply critical of the Harrying:
"I have often praised William in this book, but I can say nothing good about this brutal slaughter. God will punish him... In his anger he commanded that all crops and herds, chattels and food of every kind should be brought together and burned to ashes, so that the whole region north of the Humber might be stripped of all means of sustenance."
Orderic Vitalis estimated that over 100,000 people died as a result of the Harrying — from violence, starvation, and disease. Modern historians debate this figure, but most agree that the death toll was catastrophic, with estimates ranging from tens of thousands to over 100,000.
The destruction of food stores and livestock caused a terrible famine in the winter and spring of 1069–1070. Some chronicles report cases of cannibalism as desperate survivors resorted to eating the dead.
Refugees fled south, spreading disease and hunger. Some sold themselves into slavery to survive.
Exam Tip: When evaluating the Harrying of the North, you must consider the reliability of the sources. Orderic Vitalis was writing decades after the event, and his figures may be exaggerated. However, the Domesday Book evidence of widespread "waste" in 1086 provides independent confirmation of the devastation. A good answer would use both types of evidence.
This is a key evaluation question for AQA GCSE History.
Exam Tip: AQA loves evaluation questions about the Harrying. The strongest answers will consider both sides and reach a supported judgement. You might conclude that the Harrying was effective but morally indefensible, or that it was a brutal but rational response to a genuine threat. Whatever your conclusion, support it with specific evidence.
| Impact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Economic | Northern England was economically devastated for a generation. Agricultural production took decades to recover. |
| Social | The population of the north was drastically reduced. Communities were destroyed and displaced. |
| Political | The Harrying ended northern resistance permanently. The north was brought firmly under Norman control. |
| Cultural | The destruction of Anglo-Scandinavian culture in the north was accelerated. |
| William's reputation | Even his supporters were shocked. The Harrying damaged William's reputation among his own people. |
Question: "The Harrying of the North was a justified response to rebellion." How far do you agree? [16 marks + 4 SPaG]
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.