You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
This lesson pairs a disturbing poem about a trapped marriage with a tender meditation on a parent letting go of a child. Both explore love that involves separation and distance between two people — but the emotional registers could not be more different. Mew's farmer cannot reach his wife; Day-Lewis must allow his son to walk away.
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Poet | Charlotte Mew (1869–1928) |
| Movement | Late Victorian / early modernist |
| Published | 1916 |
| Form | Dramatic monologue |
| Key context | Mew lived during a period when women had very few legal rights in marriage; she herself never married and experienced same-sex attraction in a repressive era |
In the Victorian and Edwardian periods, marriage was often an economic arrangement. Women had limited rights — upon marriage, a wife's property and legal identity were absorbed into her husband's. Mew's poem can be read as a critique of this patriarchal system.
A farmer describes his young bride, whom he married "at midsummer" three years ago. The bride became terrified of her husband (and perhaps of men and sexuality generally), ran away, and was chased down and brought back by the men of the village. Since her return, she lives in the house but avoids the farmer — she sleeps in a separate attic room. The farmer describes her in increasingly animal-like and sexualised terms. The poem ends with the farmer's barely contained desire and frustration.
| Quote | Technique | Analysis |
|---|---|---|
| "Three Summers since I chose a maid" | Possessive verb | "Chose" — she had no say; marriage as selection, like choosing livestock |
| "Too young maybe — but more's to do / At harvest-time than bide and woo" | Aside / pragmatic tone | The farmer acknowledges she may have been too young, then dismisses it — work comes first |
| "She runned away" | Dialect | Non-standard grammar establishes the farmer as uneducated, rural — adding authenticity to the monologue |
| "We caught her, fetched her home again" | Collective pronoun | "We" — the whole community participates in trapping her; she has no allies, no escape |
| "Like the shut of a winter's day" | Simile | She closes herself off like a winter sunset — cold, abrupt, dark |
| "Her eyes, her hair, her hair!" | Repetition / crescendo | The repetition of "her hair" reveals the farmer's growing, uncontrollable desire — he is fixating on her body |
| "The soft young down of her" | Sensory / animalistic imagery | "Down" likens her to a young bird or small animal — she is prey, not partner |
| "Oh! my God! the down, / The soft young down of her" | Exclamatory / sexual frustration | The final exclamation is ambiguous — a prayer, a cry of despair, or a barely contained expression of violent desire |
| Feature | Detail | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Dramatic monologue | Farmer speaks; wife is silent | The wife has no voice — she is defined entirely through the husband's perspective |
| Irregular line lengths | Short and long lines mix | Reflects the farmer's agitated, uneven emotional state |
| Rhyming couplets and triplets | Loose, folk-song quality | Echoes rural ballad tradition; the "simple" form masks disturbing content |
| Six stanzas of uneven length | Increasingly urgent | Stanzas grow more emotionally intense as the farmer's desire escalates |
| Present tense shift | Final stanza moves to present | The shift from narration to immediate feeling ("Oh! my God!") makes the ending shockingly intimate |
Point: Mew presents the farmer's bride as utterly voiceless and trapped, using the dramatic monologue form to emphasise her silence.
Evidence: The farmer narrates: "We caught her, fetched her home again."
Analysis: The collective pronoun "We" is chilling — it reveals that the entire community, not just the farmer, participated in recapturing the bride. The verbs "caught" and "fetched" are the language of animal husbandry: one "catches" a runaway horse and "fetches" a dog. The bride is not reasoned with, persuaded, or comforted — she is physically retrieved, like property. The brevity of the line mirrors the swiftness and efficiency of the capture: there is no struggle described, no negotiation. Mew's choice of dramatic monologue form deepens the horror — we hear only the farmer's perspective. The bride's terror, her reasons for running, her feelings upon return are all absent. This formal silencing mirrors her literal silencing within the marriage.
Link: The absence of the bride's voice can be compared to the silence of the beloved in Porphyria's Lover. In both poems, male speakers narrate female silence — but while Browning's speaker creates silence through murder, Mew's farmer maintains it through the structures of marriage and rural community. Both poems expose how patriarchal power operates through the control of women's voices.
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Poet | Cecil Day-Lewis (1904–1972) |
| Published | 1962 |
| Subject | His son Sean's first day at school (a football match) |
| Key context | Day-Lewis was a Poet Laureate; the poem is dedicated "for Sean" — it is deeply personal |
| Movement | Post-war / mid-twentieth century |
This poem captures a universal parental experience: the moment when a child first walks away independently, and the parent must let them go. It was written nearly two decades after the event, suggesting the memory remained vivid and emotionally significant.
The speaker (a father) recalls a specific day — probably his son's first day at school — when the boy walked away across a playing field after a football match. The speaker describes the pain of watching the child leave, comparing it to a "satellite / Wrenched from its orbit." The poem moves from specific memory to universal reflection: love requires the courage to let go, and this "letting go" is "the worst kind of pain."
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.