You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
While Kathy is the narrator, the supporting characters in Never Let Me Go are essential for understanding the novel's themes and Ishiguro's critique of society. This lesson analyses Tommy, Ruth, and the key adult figures — Miss Lucy, Miss Emily, and Madame.
MADAME (Marie-Claude)
/ | \
Gallery fears the wants to
curator clones prove they
have souls
MISS EMILY MISS LUCY
(head of Hailsham) (guardian)
believes in gradual believes in
revelation direct truth
\ /
HAILSHAM
/ | \
KATHY -- TOMMY -- RUTH
(narrator) | (manipulator)
\ | /
love triangle
Tommy is arguably the novel's most tragic figure — a character whose emotional vulnerability and creative struggle embody the central question of whether the clones have souls.
Angry Outcast → Gentle Friend → Ruth's Partner → Kathy's Love → Devastated Donor
(Part One) (Part One) (Part Two) (Part Three) (Part Three)
In childhood, Tommy has violent rages — outbursts of screaming and physical fury that make him an outcast among the other students. These rages are significant:
| Interpretation | Argument |
|---|---|
| Frustration at his inability to create art | The guardians value creativity; Tommy's failure excludes him |
| Instinctive rebellion | His body rebels even when his mind cannot articulate why |
| Suppressed knowledge | On some level, he senses the truth about their fate |
| Foreshadowing | His final scream in Chapter 22 mirrors his childhood rages but with full understanding |
Tommy's relationship with creativity is a key thread:
Examiner's tip: Tommy's art is rich material for essays about the soul, identity, and the gap between intention and reception. You could write: "Tommy's delicate animal drawings are profoundly ironic: they demonstrate exactly the kind of soul and creativity that the Gallery was designed to detect, yet they arrive too late — Hailsham has closed, and society has moved on. Ishiguro uses Tommy's art to suggest that proof of humanity is irrelevant to a world that has chosen not to look."
| Quote | Significance |
|---|---|
| "I think Miss Lucy was right ... We weren't being taught enough about donations and all that." | Tommy grasps the "told and not told" problem |
| "Suppose it's true, what the veterans are saying. Suppose some special arrangement can be made for some couples." | Hope — fragile and ultimately misplaced |
| His primal scream (Chapter 22) | Raw grief; mirrors childhood rages but now with full understanding |
Ruth is the novel's most complex and divisive character — manipulative, insecure, and deeply human. She functions as Kathy's closest friend, her rival, and ultimately, the catalyst for the deferral quest.
Social Leader → Possessive Girlfriend → Cruel Manipulator → Regretful Donor → Posthumous Redeemer
(Part One) (Part Two) (Part Two) (Part Three) (Part Three)
Ruth's manipulative behaviour is consistent throughout the novel:
| Behaviour | Example | What it reveals |
|---|---|---|
| Social control | She dictates who is "in" and "out" of her group at Hailsham | Need for power and validation |
| Mimicry | She copies behaviours from television at the Cottages | Desperation to appear "normal"; lack of authentic identity |
| Possessiveness | She keeps Tommy as her boyfriend despite sensing he loves Kathy | Fear of being alone; need to control |
| Cruelty | She mocks Tommy's art in front of others | Insecurity expressed as aggression |
| Keeping Kathy and Tommy apart | She discourages their closeness throughout Part Two | Selfishness, but also fear of losing both of them |
In Part Three, Ruth confesses and apologises:
Examiner's tip: Ruth's confession is a critical moment for debate. Is her redemption genuine? Or is it too late to matter? A grade 9 response might argue: "Ruth's deathbed confession is simultaneously an act of genuine love and a final assertion of control — even in her apology, she dictates the terms of Kathy and Tommy's relationship. Ishiguro presents redemption as real but insufficient; Ruth cannot undo the years she stole from them."
| Quote | Significance |
|---|---|
| "We all know it. We're modelled from trash." | Self-hatred; internalised dehumanisation |
| "I was pretty much ready when I became a donor. It felt right." | Acceptance — or conditioning disguised as acceptance? |
| Her confession at the boat (Chapter 20) | Remorse, honesty, and the catalyst for the deferral quest |
Miss Lucy is a guardian at Hailsham who believes the students should be told the truth about their fate directly.
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Role | Guardian (teacher) at Hailsham |
| Belief | The students should be told the full truth about donations |
| Key moment | Her "told and not told" speech in Chapter 6 |
| Contradiction | She first tells Tommy his art does not matter, then retracts this |
| Departure | She is forced out of Hailsham — her approach threatens the institution |
| Function | Represents the possibility of honesty within a system built on concealment |
"The problem, as I see it, is that you've been told and not told. You've been told, but none of you really understand."
Miss Lucy's removal from Hailsham demonstrates that truth-telling is dangerous to oppressive systems. The institution cannot function if its subjects fully understand their exploitation.
Examiner's tip: Miss Lucy and Miss Emily represent opposing philosophies of care. Miss Lucy believes in direct truth; Miss Emily believes in gradual, sheltered revelation. Neither approach changes the clones' fate — which suggests that the problem is not how the truth is delivered but the system itself.
Miss Emily is the head guardian of Hailsham and one of its founders. She appears in full only in Chapter 22, when Kathy and Tommy visit her.
| Revelation | Significance |
|---|---|
| Hailsham was an experiment in humane treatment of clones | Even "humane" treatment still ends in organ harvesting |
| The Gallery was designed to prove clones have souls | Society was asked to see clones as human — and refused |
| Other institutions were "like battery farms" | Hailsham was the exception, not the rule |
| The deferral does not exist | The clones' last hope is destroyed |
| Public opinion turned against humane treatment | Scandal (the "Morningdale" affair) ended progressive attitudes |
Miss Emily is a deeply ambiguous figure:
| Interpretation | Argument |
|---|---|
| Compassionate idealist | She genuinely tried to improve the clones' lives |
| Complicit in the system | She never questioned whether cloning itself was wrong — only how clones were treated |
| Paternalistic | She decided what the clones should and should not know |
| Self-justifying | Her speech in Chapter 22 reads partly as a defence of her own choices |
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.