You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
When conducting research, psychologists cannot usually study everyone in the population of interest. Instead, they select a sample — a smaller group of people who are intended to be representative of the wider population. The method used to select this sample can significantly affect the quality and generalisability of the findings.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Population | The entire group of people that the researcher is interested in (e.g. all GCSE students in the UK) |
| Sample | The smaller group of people selected from the population to take part in the study |
| Sampling | The process of selecting participants from the population |
| Generalisability | The extent to which findings from the sample can be applied to the wider population |
| Bias | A systematic distortion in the sample that means it does not represent the population accurately |
flowchart TD
A[Sampling Methods] --> B[Random]
A --> C[Opportunity]
A --> D[Stratified]
A --> E[Systematic]
B --> B1["Equal chance for all<br/>low bias, hard to do"]
C --> C1["Whoever is available<br/>quick, biased"]
D --> D1["Subgroups in proportion<br/>representative"]
E --> E1["Every nth person<br/>objective, hidden patterns risk"]
Every member of the target population has an equal chance of being selected.
How: Names are drawn from a hat, or a random number generator is used to select participants from a complete list of the population.
| Advantage | Disadvantage |
|---|---|
| Unbiased — every person has an equal chance | Requires a complete list of the target population, which is often difficult to obtain |
| Most likely to produce a representative sample | Time-consuming and logistically difficult |
| Results are more generalisable | Selected participants may decline to take part, creating a biased sample |
The researcher selects whoever is available and willing to take part at the time and place of the study.
How: The researcher approaches people in a convenient location (e.g. on campus, in a shopping centre).
| Advantage | Disadvantage |
|---|---|
| Quick and easy — convenient for the researcher | Biased — only includes people who are available in that location at that time |
| Inexpensive | Not representative — may over-represent certain groups (e.g. students) |
| Difficult to generalise to the wider population |
The population is divided into subgroups (strata) based on relevant characteristics (e.g. age, gender, ethnicity), and participants are randomly selected from each subgroup in proportion to their occurrence in the population.
How: If the population is 60% female and 40% male, the sample should also be 60% female and 40% male. Participants within each stratum are selected randomly.
| Advantage | Disadvantage |
|---|---|
| Produces a representative sample that reflects the composition of the population | Time-consuming — requires detailed knowledge of the population's composition |
| Ensures that minority groups are included | Requires a complete list of the population and information about subgroups |
| Results are more generalisable | Difficult to implement in practice |
Participants are selected according to a fixed pattern from a list (e.g. every 5th, 10th, or 20th person on a list).
How: Starting from a random point on the list, every nth person is selected.
| Advantage | Disadvantage |
|---|---|
| Objective — follows a fixed rule, reducing researcher bias | The list may have a hidden pattern that biases the sample |
| Easy to implement once the list is available | Requires an ordered list of the population |
| More structured than opportunity sampling | Not truly random — some members of the population may never be selected |
| Method | Representative? | Ease of Use | Bias Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Random | High | Low (difficult) | Low |
| Opportunity | Low | High (easy) | High |
| Stratified | High | Low (difficult) | Low |
| Systematic | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate |
A sample is generalisable if the findings from the sample can be reasonably applied to the wider population. Generalisability depends on:
Exam Tip: When evaluating a study, always consider the sampling method used. Opportunity samples (which are very common in psychology) may be biased and limit generalisability. This is a valid criticism of many studies.
A famous illustration of sampling bias is the 1936 Literary Digest poll of US voters, which predicted a landslide victory for one candidate based on a huge sample. The prediction was wrong because the sample was drawn from telephone owners and magazine subscribers — both wealthier than the average American at the time. The sample was large but biased, and the magazine's reputation never recovered. In psychology, biased samples rarely cause public scandals, but they routinely lead to findings that fail to generalise — which is one reason the field has faced a "replication crisis" in recent years.
The takeaway: a small, carefully drawn sample is often more valuable than a large, biased one.
Identify the sampling method in each of the following.
Scenario A: A researcher takes every 10th name from a school register. → Systematic sampling.
Scenario B: A researcher puts all names from a list into a hat and draws 30. → Random sampling.
Scenario C: A researcher stands outside a coffee shop and asks the first 40 customers who agree. → Opportunity sampling.
Scenario D: A researcher ensures her sample is 60% female and 40% male (matching the college's population), with names randomly chosen within each group. → Stratified sampling.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.