You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Christians believe in one God who has specific qualities and characteristics. Understanding the nature of God is fundamental to the study of Christianity. This lesson explores the key attributes of God and the doctrine of the Trinity, which is central to Christian belief.
Christians believe that God possesses a number of important qualities. These are revealed through scripture, tradition, and religious experience.
| Attribute | Meaning | Biblical Support |
|---|---|---|
| Omnipotent | God is all-powerful; there is nothing God cannot do | "For nothing will be impossible with God" (Luke 1:37) |
| Omnibenevolent | God is all-loving and all-good | "God is love" (1 John 4:8) |
| Omniscient | God is all-knowing; God knows everything past, present, and future | "Before a word is on my tongue you, Lord, know it completely" (Psalm 139:4) |
| Omnipresent | God is present everywhere at all times | "Where can I go from your Spirit?" (Psalm 139:7) |
| Just | God is fair and judges people righteously | "He will judge the world in righteousness" (Psalm 9:8) |
| Transcendent | God is beyond and above human understanding and the physical world | "For my thoughts are not your thoughts" (Isaiah 55:8) |
| Immanent | God is involved and present in the world | Christians believe God acts in the world through the Holy Spirit |
| Eternal | God has no beginning and no end | "Before the mountains were born... you are God" (Psalm 90:2) |
Exam Tip: You may be asked to explain how two of God's qualities might appear to conflict. For example, if God is omnipotent and omnibenevolent, why does suffering exist? This is known as the problem of evil and is covered in a later theme.
The Trinity is one of the most important and distinctive Christian doctrines. Christians believe that God exists as three persons in one God:
graph TD
A[God] --> B[Father]
A --> C[Son]
A --> D[Holy Spirit]
B --- E[Creator and Sustainer]
C --- F[Incarnation and Salvation]
D --- G[Guide and Comforter]
B <-->|"same substance"| C
C <-->|"same substance"| D
B <-->|"same substance"| D
"Go and make disciples of all nations, baptising them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit." (Matthew 28:19)
Exam Tip: Be prepared to explain why the Trinity matters to Christians. It shows that God is relational, loving, and active in the world. It also explains how one God can be creator, saviour, and sustainer.
Christians believe God is like a loving father who:
Jesus taught his followers to call God "Father" in the Lord's Prayer: "Our Father, who art in heaven..." (Matthew 6:9).
However, some Christians prefer gender-neutral language for God, arguing that God is beyond gender and that calling God "Father" is a metaphor, not a literal description.
Christians believe God is a just judge who will hold all people accountable for their actions. This belief is linked to:
Key Term: Theodicy — an attempt to explain why a good and powerful God allows evil and suffering to exist.
| View | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Traditional/Orthodox | God is personal, all-powerful, and actively intervenes in the world |
| Liberal | God may be understood more symbolically; the Trinity is a metaphor for different aspects of God's activity |
| Process Theology | God is not all-powerful but works with the world; God suffers alongside creation |
| Deism | God created the world but does not intervene — like a watchmaker who winds the clock and lets it run |
The Christian understanding of God is rich and complex. God is believed to be all-powerful, all-loving, all-knowing, and present everywhere. The doctrine of the Trinity — Father, Son, and Holy Spirit — is central to Christian faith and distinguishes it from other monotheistic religions. These beliefs shape how Christians worship, pray, and understand their relationship with God.
The problem of evil — how can an all-powerful and all-loving God allow suffering? — is the sharpest challenge to Christian belief in the nature of God. Different Christian traditions respond differently, and this is one of the most common 12-mark exam questions at AQA GCSE.
Stating the problem. The philosopher David Hume, following Epicurus, put the problem starkly: "Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Whence then is evil?" Christians cannot simply ignore this. The book of Job, the Psalms of Lament (Psalm 22, quoted by Jesus on the cross), and Habakkuk 1 all wrestle with the problem inside scripture itself.
Traditional/orthodox response — the free-will defence. Most mainstream Catholic, Anglican, and Orthodox Christians follow the response developed by St Augustine (4th-5th century) and updated by philosophers like Alvin Plantinga. Evil exists because God created humans with genuine free will — the ability to love, which necessarily includes the ability to reject God. Moral evil (murder, war, cruelty) is the result of human sin; God permits it rather than overriding human freedom. Natural evil (earthquakes, disease) is often linked to the Fall of humanity in Genesis 3, which disrupted all of creation (Romans 8:20-22). Supporting verse: Genesis 1:31, "God saw all that he had made, and it was very good" — evil is a corruption of an originally good world, not part of God's design.
Irenaean / soul-making response. St Irenaeus (2nd century) and more recently John Hick offered an alternative: God created humans immature in a world where suffering is the necessary context for spiritual growth. Suffering builds character — faith, courage, compassion. Romans 5:3-4, "suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope," supports this view. This tradition is popular among liberal and mainstream Protestants.
Process theology response. A minority position (Alfred North Whitehead, Charles Hartshorne) argues God is not all-powerful in the traditional sense. God works with the world, inviting rather than compelling. This preserves God's love and goodness but at the cost of omnipotence. Some Christians find this unorthodox; others find it pastorally comforting.
The cross. All Christian responses ultimately point to the crucifixion. At Golgotha, God himself enters human suffering. Jesus' cry "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?" (Matthew 27:46, quoting Psalm 22:1) shows that God does not stand aloof from evil — God suffers with and for creation. The Lutheran theologian Jürgen Moltmann wrote a famous book called The Crucified God developing this theme.
Conclusion. Christians do not have a neat solution but a response: God permits evil temporarily as the price of freedom, uses suffering for soul-making, enters suffering himself in Christ, and will finally defeat evil at the end of time (Revelation 21:4, "He will wipe every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain"). This tension between divine omnipotence, omnibenevolence, and the reality of evil is sometimes called a theodicy — literally "justifying God" — and every Christian tradition has had to wrestle with it.
Misconception: "The Trinity means Christians believe in three gods."
Correction: Christianity is strictly monotheistic — there is one God (Deuteronomy 6:4, "Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one"). The Trinity means one God exists as three persons (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) who share one divine substance (Greek homoousios). This was defined at the Council of Nicaea (325 CE) and the Council of Constantinople (381 CE). Analogies often fall short — St Patrick's shamrock analogy or water/ice/steam are imperfect — but the core claim is: one God, three persons. Students who write "three gods" in an exam will lose marks. The heresy of tritheism (three gods) was rejected by the early Church, as was modalism (one God appearing in three modes or disguises).
12-mark question: "The existence of evil proves God cannot be omnipotent and omnibenevolent." Evaluate this statement. In your answer you should refer to Christian teachings, give reasoned arguments to support this statement, give reasoned arguments to support a different point of view, reach a justified conclusion. [12 marks + 3 SPaG]
Grade 3-4 answer: "Some people say if God was all good and all powerful there would be no evil but there is lots of evil in the world like wars. But Christians say God gave people free will to choose. So people cause evil not God. The Bible says God is love (1 John 4:8) so he must have a reason. I think Christians are right because people do bad things not God." (Basic idea; minimal scripture; weak AO2.)
Grade 5-6 answer: "Some people agree with this. If God is omnipotent he could stop earthquakes but he doesn't. If he is omnibenevolent he would want to. So maybe he doesn't exist. However, Christians disagree. They use the free-will defence — God gave humans free will and some people choose to do evil like murder. That is their fault, not God's. Christians also say suffering can build character (Romans 5:3-4). Jesus suffered on the cross so God understands. A non-religious person would still say this doesn't explain earthquakes. In conclusion, the statement is too strong — Christians have reasonable answers." (Explicit scripture; multiple views; reasonable conclusion.)
Grade 7-9 answer: "This is the classic problem of evil. Supporters argue Hume's formulation is devastating: if God is omnipotent he could prevent evil; if omnibenevolent he would want to; therefore either evil shouldn't exist or God is not both. The 2004 Asian tsunami killed 230,000 innocent people — difficult to reconcile with a loving, powerful God. However, Christians offer several responses. (1) The free-will defence (Augustine, Plantinga) — God created humans with genuine free will, making moral evil the price of love. (2) The soul-making theodicy (Irenaeus, John Hick) — suffering builds virtue (Romans 5:3-4, 'suffering produces perseverance'). (3) The cross — God in Christ enters human suffering; Jesus' cry 'My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?' (Matthew 27:46) shows divine solidarity with suffering. (4) Eschatological hope — Revelation 21:4 promises God will wipe away every tear. Process theologians modify God's omnipotence while preserving his love. A humanist would reply these are just rationalisations and the simpler explanation is that God does not exist. Conclusion: evil is a serious problem but does not prove God is neither omnipotent nor omnibenevolent — it depends on whether Christian responses are judged coherent. For Christians, the cross shows that God does not merely permit evil from a distance but enters into it and will finally defeat it. The statement overstates its case: evil is evidence against traditional theism but not definitive proof." (Sophisticated AO1 and AO2; Hume, Plantinga, Hick, Moltmann, humanist; carefully balanced conclusion.)
This content is aligned with the AQA GCSE Religious Studies A (8062) specification, Component 1: The study of religions — Christianity. For the most accurate and up-to-date information, please refer to the official AQA specification document.