You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Beyond the central educational debate, The History Boys explores three further themes that are essential for GCSE: history (what it is and who controls it), sexuality (desire, repression, and identity), and class (social mobility and the barriers to it). These themes are woven into the play's fabric and intersect with each other constantly.
The play is unusual because history is both its subject matter (the boys are studying history) and its method (the play itself is a piece of historical storytelling, looking back on events from the future).
This creates a layered effect:
| Level | What happens |
|---|---|
| Within the play | The boys study history (First World War, Holocaust, etc.) |
| The play itself | The play tells the story of the boys' education — itself a historical narrative |
| Bennett's context | Bennett writes in 2004 about the 1980s, looking back through the lens of the Iraq War |
The play stages an explicit debate about what history is:
Mrs Lintott: "History is a commentary on the various and continuing incapabilities of men."
Irwin: "History nowadays is not a matter of conviction. It's a performance."
Hector: "It's subjunctive history. Might-have-been history. The historian's got to be part-Loss Adjuster... What if, how about, suppose..."
Each character represents a different historiographical tradition:
| Character | Historical approach | Critical term |
|---|---|---|
| Mrs Lintott | Empiricist — history is what happened | Empiricism |
| Irwin | Relativist — history is constructed | Postmodernism / Relativism |
| Hector | Humanist — history is lived experience | Liberal Humanism |
The most sustained historical discussion in the play concerns the First World War. This is not accidental — WWI is:
The climactic moment — Posner singing Hardy's "Drummer Hodge" — resolves this tension temporarily. The poem does both: it makes us feel the reality of a young soldier's death AND it offers material for sophisticated literary-historical analysis.
Bennett connects the teaching of history to political power. Irwin's future career as a government spin doctor makes explicit what the play implies: those who control the historical narrative control public opinion.
Examiner's tip: Connect this to AO3 (context). Bennett wrote during the Iraq War, when the UK government was accused of manipulating intelligence. Irwin's trajectory — from teaching boys to "spin" history essays to helping the government spin policy — is a deliberate parallel.
Sexuality is a pervasive theme in The History Boys. Bennett — himself a gay man who was reluctant to discuss his sexuality publicly for decades — uses the play to explore desire, repression, and the complex power dynamics of sexual attraction.
The play presents sexuality not as binary but as a spectrum:
| Character | Sexuality | Key detail |
|---|---|---|
| Hector | Gay / bisexual (married but attracted to boys) | Acts on desire covertly (touching on motorbike) |
| Irwin | Gay (closeted) | Attracted to Dakin but paralysed by fear |
| Posner | Gay (open) | In love with Dakin — unrequited and painful |
| Dakin | Heterosexual (sexually fluid) | Pursues Irwin; has affair with Fiona |
| Mrs Lintott | Heterosexual (but sidelined) | Subject to the Headmaster's unwanted advances |
Hector's touching of the boys is the play's most morally challenging element. Bennett refuses to simplify it:
Examiner's tip: A Grade 9 response will address the complexity without excusing the behaviour. You might write: "Bennett presents Hector's misconduct not to normalise it but to expose the hypocrisy of an institution that tolerates abuse when convenient and condemns it only when reputation is at stake."
Irwin's closeted sexuality mirrors his intellectual inauthenticity. Just as he performs confidence he does not feel, he conceals desires he cannot acknowledge. His paralysis when Dakin pursues him reveals the gap between his public persona (assured, clever, in control) and his private self (frightened, lonely, yearning).
Posner is the character most damaged by the play's sexual politics. He is:
"I'm a Jew. I'm small. I'm homosexual. And I live in Sheffield. I'm fucked." — Posner
Dakin's pursuit of Irwin inverts the expected power dynamic between teacher and student. He is the pursuer, not the pursued — and he treats the relationship as another conquest, another exercise of power.
This mirrors his approach to everything: transactional, strategic, and devoid of genuine emotional engagement. His sexuality is an expression of his power, not his vulnerability.
The 1980s setting is crucial for understanding the play's treatment of sexuality:
| Historical fact | Relevance to the play |
|---|---|
| Homosexuality partially decriminalised (1967) | But social hostility remained extreme |
| Section 28 (introduced 1988) | Prohibited "promotion" of homosexuality in schools |
| AIDS crisis (mid-1980s) | Increased fear and stigma around homosexuality |
| Gay rights movement nascent | Political activism was growing but far from mainstream |
The boys are from working-class and lower-middle-class families in Sheffield. Their grammar school education is their route to social mobility — and the Oxbridge examination is the gateway.
Bennett — who made the same journey from Leeds to Oxford — writes about this with deep personal understanding.
| Stage of the journey | What happens |
|---|---|
| Grammar school | The boys are selected by ability and given an academic education |
| A-levels | They achieve excellent results — but this is not enough |
| Oxbridge preparation | They must learn to perform as if they belong at Oxford or Cambridge |
| The interview | They must demonstrate cultural fluency — the codes of the elite |
The play reveals that academic ability alone is insufficient for social mobility. The boys must also acquire:
Bennett uses language to mark class distinctions:
Examiner's tip: Note how Irwin's lie about attending Oxford (he actually went to Bristol) is a class performance. He reinvents himself to fit the world he wants to inhabit — just as he teaches the boys to reinvent their arguments to fit what examiners want.
Rudge's admission to Oxford — not through academic brilliance but because his father works as a college servant there — punctures the myth of pure meritocracy. The system is not as fair as it claims:
"My dad's a builder. Well, he's a college servant at Corpus Christi. It's the same thing." — Rudge
This moment reveals that social connections, not just academic merit, determine who gets access to elite institutions.
Sheffield represents the industrial North — a world of manual labour, economic decline, and limited horizons. Oxford and Cambridge represent the privileged South — a world of intellectual leisure, cultural abundance, and career advancement.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.