You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The most common mistake in Section B essays is one-sidedness. Candidates take a position and then argue for it relentlessly, ignoring or dismissing everything that could be said against it. This approach feels decisive — but to an admissions tutor reading the essay, it looks simplistic.
The strongest Section B essays demonstrate that the writer understands both sides of the debate before committing to a position. This is not fence-sitting. It is the foundation of genuinely persuasive argumentation — and it is precisely the skill that law schools are looking for.
Law is fundamentally adversarial. Barristers must understand their opponent's case as thoroughly as their own. Solicitors must anticipate counterarguments. Judges must weigh competing claims fairly. The ability to see both sides of an argument is not a nice extra in legal thinking — it is the central skill.
When an admissions tutor reads your Section B essay, they are asking: "Can this person think like a lawyer?" An essay that shows awareness of only one perspective answers that question with a clear "no".
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.