You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Ethics is the most frequently tested topic area in LNAT Section B. Questions in this category ask you to grapple with moral dilemmas — situations where competing values or principles pull in different directions. To write a strong essay on an ethics topic, you need to understand the major ethical frameworks, know how to argue both sides of a dilemma, and have concrete examples ready to deploy.
Every ethics essay benefits from awareness of these three broad approaches to moral reasoning. You do not need to name them explicitly in your essay, but understanding them will make your arguments sharper and more structured.
| Framework | Core Principle | Typical Argument |
|---|---|---|
| Consequentialism (Utilitarianism) | The right action is the one that produces the best overall outcome | "Euthanasia should be permitted because it reduces suffering for both the patient and their family" |
| Deontology (Rights-Based) | Some actions are inherently right or wrong, regardless of consequences | "Euthanasia is wrong because it violates the sanctity of human life" |
| Virtue Ethics | The right action is what a virtuous person would do in the circumstances | "A compassionate society would allow euthanasia; a society that values life would not — the question is which virtue takes priority" |
These frameworks frequently conflict, which is precisely what makes ethics questions debatable. A strong essay acknowledges this tension.
The question: Should people have the right to choose when and how they die?
| In Favour | Against |
|---|---|
| Autonomy: individuals should control their own bodies and lives | Sanctity of life: no one should deliberately end a human life |
| Compassion: prolonged suffering is cruel when death is inevitable | Slippery slope: legalisation could lead to pressure on the elderly or disabled |
| Already happens: doctors already make end-of-life decisions (e.g., withdrawing treatment) — legalisation provides safeguards | Medical ethics: the Hippocratic tradition requires doctors to "do no harm" |
| International evidence: countries like the Netherlands and Belgium have functioning systems with safeguards | Diagnosis uncertainty: prognoses can be wrong; patients may have more time than predicted |
Key example: The Dignitas clinic in Switzerland; the Assisted Dying Act debates in the UK Parliament; Oregon's Death with Dignity Act.
Essay Tip: The strongest essays on euthanasia distinguish between different types — voluntary euthanasia, assisted suicide, and non-voluntary euthanasia — because the moral arguments differ significantly for each.
The question: Is the death penalty ever justified?
| In Favour | Against |
|---|---|
| Justice: some crimes are so heinous that only death is proportionate | Irreversibility: wrongful executions cannot be undone |
| Deterrence: the threat of execution may deter the most serious crimes | Evidence: most studies find no significant deterrent effect |
| Protection: permanently prevents reoffending | Inequality: the death penalty is disproportionately applied to minorities and the poor |
| Victims' families: may feel that justice requires the ultimate punishment | State power: giving the state the power to kill citizens is inherently dangerous |
Key example: The US experience (wrongful convictions revealed by the Innocence Project); abolition across Europe; the case of Derek Bentley in the UK.
The question: Do animals have moral rights, and if so, what are the implications?
| In Favour of Animal Rights | Against Extensive Animal Rights |
|---|---|
| Sentience: animals feel pain; causing unnecessary suffering is morally wrong | Moral agency: rights are linked to moral responsibility, which animals lack |
| Consistency: if we protect human infants who cannot reason, why not animals? | Human welfare: medical research on animals saves human lives |
| Environmental: intensive farming causes environmental destruction | Cultural: meat consumption is deeply embedded in human cultures |
| Alternatives exist: plant-based diets and non-animal research methods are increasingly viable | Degree: there is a moral difference between a chimpanzee and an insect |
Key example: Peter Singer's Animal Liberation; the Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness (2012); the ban on cosmetics testing on animals in the EU.
The question: Should genetic modification of humans be permitted?
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.