You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Technology questions in LNAT Section B have become increasingly common as digital technology reshapes every aspect of society. These prompts ask you to engage with the ethical, political, and social implications of technological change — particularly around surveillance, data rights, artificial intelligence, and social media. To write well on these topics, you need current affairs awareness combined with the ability to apply ethical and political principles to novel situations.
Technology essays differ from other LNAT topics in one important respect: the landscape changes rapidly. A question about democracy draws on principles debated for 2,500 years; a question about AI regulation draws on developments from the last decade. This means:
The question: How much surveillance should the state (or private companies) be permitted to conduct?
| In Favour of Surveillance | In Favour of Strong Privacy |
|---|---|
| Security: surveillance prevents terrorism and serious crime | Chilling effect: knowing you are watched changes your behaviour, even if you have "nothing to hide" |
| Accountability: data helps hold individuals and institutions accountable | Power imbalance: surveillance gives the state or corporations enormous power over individuals |
| Efficiency: targeted surveillance is more effective than random checks | Mission creep: surveillance systems introduced for one purpose are routinely expanded to others |
| Consent: if you agree to terms of service, you have consented to data collection | Informed consent is a fiction: nobody reads the terms; consent is not freely given |
Key examples:
Essay Tip: The strongest technology essays avoid the false dichotomy of "privacy vs. security". Instead, they explore how to achieve both — through judicial oversight, proportionality, and clear legal frameworks.
The question: Should AI development be regulated, and if so, how?
| In Favour of Minimal Regulation | In Favour of Strong Regulation |
|---|---|
| Innovation: heavy regulation stifles innovation and puts countries at a competitive disadvantage | Safety: AI systems making decisions about criminal justice, healthcare, and employment must be safe and fair |
| Premature: we do not yet understand AI well enough to regulate it effectively | Bias: AI systems trained on biased data reproduce and amplify those biases |
| Self-regulation: the tech industry has strong incentives to develop safe AI | Accountability: when an AI makes a harmful decision, someone must be responsible |
| Benefits: AI is already saving lives in medical diagnosis, climate modelling, and drug discovery | Power concentration: unregulated AI development concentrates enormous power in a few companies |
Key examples:
The question: Has social media done more harm than good, and should it be regulated?
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.