You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The substance of your argument matters most in Section B — but how you express that argument also matters. An essay that is well-reasoned but poorly written will not make the impression it deserves. Conversely, an essay that is clearly and precisely written can elevate a competent argument into a compelling one.
This lesson covers the writing skills that distinguish strong Section B essays: concise expression, appropriate register, grammatical accuracy, and clarity under pressure.
In a 500–600 word essay, every word must earn its place. Waffle — padding, repetition, and unnecessary qualifications — is the single biggest stylistic weakness in Section B essays.
| Type | Example | Tighter Version |
|---|---|---|
| Unnecessary preamble | "It is important to consider the fact that..." | [Delete — just state the point] |
| Redundant phrases | "In my personal opinion, I believe that..." | "I believe..." or simply state the thesis |
| Hedging chains | "It could perhaps be argued that it is possible that..." | "It could be argued that..." |
| Stating the obvious | "This is a very controversial and debated topic..." | [Delete — the reader knows this] |
| Repetition in different words | "This is unfair and unjust. It is not equitable." | "This is unjust." |
After writing each sentence, ask yourself: "Does this sentence advance my argument?" If the answer is no, delete it. A 500-word essay with no waffle is far more impressive than a 600-word essay padded to reach the target.
Section B requires an academic register — formal, measured, and precise. However, many candidates misunderstand this and write in an artificially pompous style that obscures rather than clarifies their meaning.
| Feature | Example |
|---|---|
| Formal vocabulary | "The evidence demonstrates..." rather than "The evidence shows..." (both are fine, but the first is slightly more formal) |
| Third person (mainly) | "It can be argued that..." rather than "I reckon that..." |
| Complete sentences | No fragments, no bullet points in the essay itself |
| Measured tone | Confident but not aggressive; critical but not dismissive |
| Pitfall | Example | Problem |
|---|---|---|
| Using obscure vocabulary | "The epistemological ramifications of this axiological quandary..." | If the reader needs a dictionary, you have failed to communicate |
| Writing excessively long sentences | A 50-word sentence with three subordinate clauses | Loses the reader; increases the risk of grammatical errors |
| Avoiding "I" entirely | Tortured passive constructions to avoid first person | It is acceptable to use "I" occasionally in Section B |
| Using jargon you do not understand | Misusing legal or philosophical terms | Worse than not using them at all |
The Golden Rule: Write clearly enough that an intelligent person with no specialist knowledge would understand every sentence on first reading.
There is a common misconception that academic writing must never use "I". This is not true, especially in an argumentative essay.
Good writing uses a mix of sentence lengths and structures. This keeps the reader engaged and demonstrates linguistic control.
"Self-regulation has failed."
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.