You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Political and policy passages are a staple of LNAT Section A. They discuss government decisions, public policy debates, political principles, and the exercise of power. These passages test your ability to evaluate competing claims, recognise ideological assumptions, and follow arguments about what governments should or should not do — all without requiring any specialist knowledge of politics.
These passages typically argue for or against a particular policy, critique a government decision, or explore a political principle (such as the limits of state power, the role of democracy, or the balance between liberty and security).
| Category | Example Topics |
|---|---|
| Criminal justice | Sentencing policy, prison reform, rehabilitation vs. punishment |
| Constitutional reform | House of Lords, devolution, electoral systems, a written constitution |
| Civil liberties | Surveillance, freedom of speech, protest rights, censorship |
| Social policy | Healthcare funding, education policy, welfare reform, housing |
| International affairs | Military intervention, foreign aid, international law, sovereignty |
| Economic policy | Taxation, austerity, public spending, privatisation |
Remember: You do not need to know anything about these topics before the test. The passage will provide all the information and arguments you need.
Policy arguments follow a characteristic structure. Recognising this structure helps you identify the components that LNAT questions target.
Most policy arguments contain these elements:
| Element | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| The status quo | How things currently stand | "The UK currently uses first-past-the-post for general elections." |
| The problem | What is wrong with the status quo | "This system produces disproportionate results and excludes smaller parties." |
| The proposal | What the author wants to change | "The UK should adopt proportional representation." |
| The justification | Why the change would be beneficial | "PR would produce parliaments that better reflect the will of the electorate." |
| The counter-argument | Why opponents resist the change | "Critics argue that PR leads to coalition governments and policy instability." |
| The rebuttal | Why the counter-argument is wrong or insufficient | "Coalition government is the norm in most European democracies and has not prevented effective governance." |
In policy passages, the author's position is almost always a claim about what should be done. Look for prescriptive language:
If the passage uses evaluative and prescriptive language, the author's conclusion is the policy they are advocating for.
Policy passages frequently present competing claims — often from different political perspectives — and LNAT questions test whether you can identify which claim belongs to which position.
"Proponents of universal basic income argue that it would eliminate poverty, reduce bureaucracy, and give individuals genuine freedom to choose how they live. Opponents counter that it would be prohibitively expensive, reduce the incentive to work, and represent an unprecedented expansion of state dependency."
A question might ask: "According to the passage, which of the following is an argument in favour of universal basic income?" You must correctly attribute each claim to the correct side.
As you read, mentally tag each claim:
| Signal | Attribution |
|---|---|
| "Proponents argue...", "Supporters contend..." | In favour of the policy |
| "Opponents counter...", "Critics object..." | Against the policy |
| "The author argues...", "However, this overlooks..." | The author's own position (which may side with either group or take a third position) |
Common Trap: The author may present both sides but ultimately endorse only one. Do not assume balance means neutrality. Read to the end to find the author's actual conclusion.
LNAT passages about politics often contain ideological assumptions — underlying beliefs about the proper role of government, the importance of individual freedom, or the nature of a just society. You do not need to know political theory, but recognising these assumptions helps you answer questions about what the author takes for granted.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.