You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Probabilistic reasoning questions in the UCAT Decision Making subtest test your ability to think logically about chance, likelihood, and uncertainty. These questions do not require advanced mathematics — they test whether you can apply basic probability concepts to everyday scenarios using common sense and logical thinking.
Probabilistic reasoning questions typically present:
The UCAT does not expect you to calculate complex probabilities. You need to understand:
The probability of an event is the number of favourable outcomes divided by the total number of possible outcomes (assuming all outcomes are equally likely):
P(event) = favourable outcomes / total outcomes
Example: A bag contains 3 red balls and 7 blue balls. The probability of randomly selecting a red ball is 3/10 = 0.3 or 30%.
The probability of an event NOT happening equals 1 minus the probability of it happening:
P(not A) = 1 - P(A)
Example: If the probability of rain tomorrow is 0.35, the probability of no rain is 1 - 0.35 = 0.65.
This is useful when it is easier to calculate the probability of something NOT happening.
Two events are independent if the occurrence of one does not affect the probability of the other.
Independent events:
NOT independent (dependent) events:
For independent events:
Example: The probability of flipping heads AND rolling a 6: (1/2) × (1/6) = 1/12
Example: The probability of drawing an ace OR a king from a full deck: 4/52 + 4/52 - 0 = 8/52 = 2/13 (since no card is both an ace and a king)
The expected value is the average outcome you would expect over many repetitions:
Expected value = sum of (each outcome × its probability)
Example: A game pays £10 if you roll a 6 (probability 1/6) and £0 otherwise. Expected value = (1/6 × £10) + (5/6 × £0) = £1.67 per game.
Some DM questions present scenarios that require you to think about how new information changes the probability of something being true. This is the essence of Bayesian reasoning, presented in everyday language.
Scenario:
Intuitive (incorrect) answer: 99%
Correct reasoning:
Consider 10,000 people:
Of the 10 who have the disease:
Of the 9,990 who do not have the disease:
Total positive results: 10 + 100 = 110
Of these 110 positive results, only 10 actually have the disease.
P(disease | positive test) = 10/110 ≈ 9.1%
Key Insight: When a condition is rare, even a highly accurate test produces many false positives. The UCAT does not expect you to calculate this precisely, but it does expect you to recognise that the intuitive answer (99%) is wrong.
A typical UCAT question might present this scenario and ask:
"Which of the following conclusions is best supported?"
A) Almost all people who test positive have the disease B) The majority of people who test positive do not actually have the disease C) The test is unreliable and should not be used D) The test result is meaningless
The correct answer is B — most positives are false positives when the condition is rare.
Scenario:
A hospital cafeteria offers 5 types of sandwich: chicken, tuna, cheese, ham, and egg. Each day, the cafeteria stocks an equal number of each type. A worker selects a sandwich without looking.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.