You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
So far in this course, we have focused on preventing patient safety incidents and responding when they occur. But what happens after an incident? This lesson covers the duty of candour — the legal and ethical obligation to be open and honest with patients when things go wrong.
The duty of candour is a legal requirement in the NHS (introduced by the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and strengthened following the Francis Inquiry into Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust). It requires healthcare organisations and professionals to:
The GMC reinforces this in Good Medical Practice:
"You must be open and honest with patients if things go wrong. If a patient under your care has suffered harm or distress, you should put matters right (if that is possible), offer an apology, and explain fully and promptly what has happened and the likely short-term and long-term effects."
The SJT frequently tests whether candidates understand that:
When a patient safety incident has occurred, the following steps should be taken (in order):
Before anything else, make sure the patient is safe. If the incident has caused ongoing harm (e.g., wrong drug still infusing), resolve the immediate danger first.
The responsible clinician must be informed immediately. As a medical student, your role is to ensure the right people know — not to manage the clinical consequences yourself.
The duty of candour requires that the patient (or their next of kin, if the patient lacks capacity) is told:
All patient safety incidents must be reported through the hospital's incident reporting system (typically Datix in the NHS). This applies to:
Patients affected by incidents need ongoing support — clinical follow-up, emotional support, and regular updates on any investigation.
Staff involved in incidents also need support. Making an error is distressing, and a blame culture discourages reporting. The NHS promotes a "just culture" where honest reporting is encouraged and systemic issues are addressed.
Serious incidents trigger a formal investigation (previously known as a Root Cause Analysis, now part of the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework — PSIRF). The aim is not to blame individuals but to understand what went wrong and how to prevent it.
Scenario:
You are a medical student on a medical ward. You witnessed a nurse give the wrong antibiotic to a patient — ceftriaxone instead of cefuroxime. The nurse realised the error immediately after administration and is visibly distressed. She turns to you and says, "The patient seems fine. Maybe we don't need to tell anyone?"
Applying the SAFE Framework with Duty of Candour:
S — Spot the Risk: A drug error has occurred. Although the patient seems fine now, ceftriaxone and cefuroxime have different spectra, side effects, and interactions. The patient needs medical review.
A — Act Appropriately: The nurse is suggesting concealing the error. This violates the duty of candour and could put the patient at risk if delayed effects occur.
F — Follow the Right Path:
E — Ensure Follow-Up:
SJT Ratings:
| Action | Rating |
|---|---|
| Explain to the nurse that the error must be reported and the patient informed | Very Appropriate |
| Inform the nurse in charge and the responsible doctor | Very Appropriate |
| Agree to keep quiet because the patient seems fine | Very Inappropriate |
| Report the nurse to the NMC (Nursing and Midwifery Council) immediately | Inappropriate — disproportionate as a first response; the incident should be managed through local processes first |
Scenario:
A patient on the ward says to you: "The doctor told me there was a problem with my blood test results — they were mixed up with someone else's, so I've been getting the wrong treatment for two days. Nobody has really explained what happened. Can you tell me?"
Analysis:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.