You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Pragmatics is the study of how context shapes meaning — how speakers and writers communicate more than the literal meaning of their words, and how listeners and readers use contextual knowledge to interpret what is really meant. Pragmatics bridges the gap between what is said and what is meant.
Consider the utterance: "It's cold in here."
The semantic (literal) meaning is a statement about temperature. But in context, this utterance might function as:
Understanding the intended meaning requires pragmatic knowledge — knowledge of the context, the relationship between participants, social conventions, and shared assumptions.
Key Definition: Pragmatics — the branch of linguistics concerned with how context contributes to meaning. Pragmatics examines how speakers communicate intended meanings beyond the literal content of their words, and how listeners use contextual knowledge to interpret those meanings.
The philosopher H.P. Grice (1975, Logic and Conversation) proposed that effective communication relies on a fundamental assumption that both parties are being cooperative. He called this the Cooperative Principle and identified four maxims (rules or guidelines) that speakers are expected to follow:
| Maxim | Expectation | Example of Following | Example of Flouting |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantity | Give the right amount of information — not too much, not too little | Q: "What time is it?" A: "Three o'clock." | A: "Well, it's past midday, which means we've been here for at least four hours, which reminds me of the time..." (too much) |
| Quality | Be truthful — do not say what you believe to be false, and do not say things for which you lack evidence | "The population of London is approximately 9 million." | "Oh yes, I absolutely love waiting in queues for hours." (sarcasm — deliberately saying the opposite of what is meant) |
| Relevance (Relation) | Be relevant — make your contribution pertinent to the current topic | Q: "Did you enjoy the film?" A: "It was brilliant — best I've seen this year." | Q: "Did you enjoy the film?" A: "The popcorn was nice." (avoiding the question by changing topic — implying the film was not enjoyable) |
| Manner | Be clear — avoid ambiguity, be brief, be orderly | "Turn left at the church, then take the second right." | "She got pregnant and got married." vs. "She got married and got pregnant." (order implies sequence — the manner maxim says be orderly) |
Key Definition: Cooperative Principle (Grice, 1975) — the assumption that participants in a conversation are cooperating to communicate effectively. The Cooperative Principle is supported by four maxims: Quantity, Quality, Relevance, and Manner.
When speakers flout (deliberately and obviously violate) a maxim, they generate an implicature — an implied meaning that the listener is expected to infer.
Key Definition: Implicature — a meaning that is implied or suggested by an utterance rather than explicitly stated. Implicatures arise when speakers flout Gricean maxims, prompting listeners to infer the intended meaning beyond the literal content.
Example: A writes a reference letter for a student applying for a philosophy programme: "Mr X has excellent handwriting and has never been late to a seminar." This flouts the maxim of quantity (far too little relevant information) and relevance (handwriting is irrelevant to philosophical ability). The implicature is that Mr X is not a good philosopher — the writer has nothing positive to say about his academic ability.
Grice distinguished between:
A presupposition is an implicit assumption that underlies an utterance — something that must be true for the utterance to make sense.
Key Definition: Presupposition — an implicit assumption embedded in an utterance that is taken for granted. For example, "Have you stopped cheating in exams?" presupposes that the addressee has previously cheated.
| Utterance | Presupposition |
|---|---|
| "Have you stopped smoking?" | The addressee used to smoke |
| "The king of France is bald." | There is a king of France |
| "She managed to finish the essay." | Finishing was difficult |
| "He did it again." | He did it before |
| "When did you realise you were wrong?" | The addressee was wrong |
Presuppositions are important in media language, political discourse, and advertising because they smuggle in assumptions that the audience may accept uncritically. A headline like "Why is the government failing our children?" presupposes that the government is indeed failing children — the reader is not invited to question this assumption.
Speech act theory was developed by J.L. Austin (1962, How to Do Things with Words) and further refined by John Searle (1969, Speech Acts). The central insight is that language does not merely describe the world — it performs actions.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.