Post-Colonial Criticism

Post-colonial criticism examines the cultural legacy of colonialism — how literature has represented, justified, challenged, and resisted imperial power. For A-Level, post-colonial theory is essential for analysing texts that deal with race, empire, cultural identity, and the politics of representation.

---

What Is Post-Colonial Criticism?

Post-colonial criticism asks:

• How does literature represent colonised peoples and their cultures?
• How has literature been used to justify or resist colonialism?
• How do writers from formerly colonised nations reclaim narrative authority?
• What happens when the "colonised" write back to the "coloniser"?

The term "post-colonial" is itself contested. It can mean:

• After colonialism — the period following independence
• Against colonialism — literature that challenges colonial power and its legacies
• Beyond colonialism — literature that moves past the colonial framework entirely

---

Key Thinkers

1. Edward Said: Orientalism (1978)

The Key Argument: Said argued that Western representations of "the East" (the Orient) are not neutral descriptions but constructions that serve Western power. "Orientalism" is the system of knowledge through which the West defines, categorises, and controls the East.

Orientalist stereotype	Function
The East as exotic, sensual, mysterious	Makes the East an object of Western fascination and desire
The East as irrational, backward, uncivilised	Justifies Western intervention and "civilising mission"
The East as unchanging, timeless	Denies Eastern peoples the capacity for development, agency, and modernity
The East as dangerous, threatening	Justifies Western military and political control

Application: In Othello, the representation of Othello draws on Orientalist stereotypes — the exotic Moor, simultaneously fascinating and threatening, whose "unnatural" marriage to a white Venetian woman must end in catastrophe. A post-colonial reading would ask: does Shakespeare reproduce or critique these stereotypes? The answer is debated.

2. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak: The Subaltern

The Key Argument: In her essay "Can the Subaltern Speak?" (1988), Spivak asked whether the most marginalised people in colonial and post-colonial societies — those at the very bottom, with no access to power or representation — can be heard within academic discourse. Her answer was, provocatively, "no" — not because they have nothing to say, but because the structures of power and knowledge silence them.

Application: In The God of Small Things, Velutha is a subaltern figure — an Untouchable whose voice is systematically silenced by caste, by the police, and by the narrative structure itself (his perspective is largely absent). Roy's novel can be read as an attempt to give voice to the subaltern — but Spivak would ask whether this is ever fully possible within a literary form shaped by Western conventions.

3. Homi Bhabha: Hybridity and the Third Space

The Key Argument: Bhabha argued that colonial encounters produce hybrid identities — neither purely coloniser nor purely colonised. The "third space" of hybridity is potentially subversive because it undermines the binary oppositions (civilised/savage, West/East, self/other) on which colonial power depends.

Concept	Definition	Application
Hybridity	The mixing of coloniser and colonised cultures, producing new, unstable identities	Barry in Mr Loverman — Antiguan-British, oscillating between Caribbean patois and English literary allusion
Mimicry	The colonised subject imitates the coloniser — but the imitation is never perfect, creating a disturbing "almost but not quite" effect	The education system in colonial India; Pip's attempts to become a "gentleman" in Great Expectations
The Third Space	The space of cultural negotiation where hybrid identities are formed — neither one culture nor the other	Celie's letters in The Color Purple — written in AAVE but addressed to God in the English Christian tradition

4. Frantz Fanon: The Psychology of Colonialism

The Key Argument: Fanon, a psychiatrist from Martinique, argued (in Black Skin, White Masks, 1952, and The Wretched of the Earth, 1961) that colonialism is not merely an economic and political system but a psychological one. The colonised subject internalises the coloniser's view — seeing themselves through the coloniser's eyes, despising their own culture, aspiring to "whiteness."