You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The debate over whether human behaviour is the product of free choice or whether it is determined by forces beyond our control is one of the oldest and most fundamental in psychology. This debate has profound implications for moral responsibility, the legal system, and the practice of therapy.
Key Definition: Free will is the idea that human beings are self-determining and free to choose their own thoughts, feelings, and actions, without being controlled by internal or external forces.
Key Definition: Determinism is the view that all behaviour has a cause, and that every event — including human thought and action — is the inevitable result of preceding causes.
Hard determinism holds that all human behaviour is caused by factors beyond our control, and that free will is an illusion. There is no room for personal choice — behaviour is entirely the product of prior causes.
This approach argues that behaviour is determined by biological structures and processes — genes, brain chemistry, hormones, and evolutionary adaptations.
Freud argued that all behaviour is determined by unconscious conflicts, wishes, and memories rooted in childhood experiences. Adult personality and behaviour are the inevitable outcome of interactions between the id, ego, and superego, shaped by events in the psychosexual stages. Even apparently "chosen" actions, such as slips of the tongue ("Freudian slips"), reveal unconscious determinism.
Key Definition: Psychic determinism is the belief that all behaviour is caused by unconscious processes over which the individual has no conscious awareness or control.
Skinner (1971) argued that free will is an illusion. In Beyond Freedom and Dignity, he proposed that all behaviour is shaped by environmental contingencies — reinforcement and punishment. Humans are "empty organisms" whose actions are entirely the product of their conditioning history.
| Type of Determinism | Approach | Key Cause of Behaviour | Key Figure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biological | Biological | Genes, hormones, neurochemistry | Gottesman & Shields |
| Psychic | Psychodynamic | Unconscious conflicts, childhood experiences | Freud |
| Environmental | Behaviourist | Reinforcement and punishment | Skinner |
Science is fundamentally deterministic. The scientific method seeks to establish causal relationships — if X, then Y. If behaviour were truly free and uncaused, it would be unpredictable and therefore impossible to study scientifically.
Key Definition: Soft determinism (also called compatibilism) is the view that all behaviour has a cause, but that humans are still free to the extent that their behaviour is not coerced or constrained by external forces. Behaviour can be both determined and freely chosen.
William James was one of the earliest advocates of soft determinism. He argued that free will and determinism are compatible: behaviour is caused, but humans actively choose among possible actions based on their desires, beliefs, and values.
The cognitive approach exemplifies soft determinism. It acknowledges that behaviour is influenced by prior causes (schemas, cognitive biases, information processing) but maintains that humans actively process information and make decisions. People are not passive recipients of stimuli — they interpret, evaluate, and choose.
Bandura's concept of reciprocal determinism illustrates this position. Bandura argued that behaviour, cognitive (personal) factors, and the environment all interact bidirectionally — behaviour is influenced by the environment, but the individual also influences their environment through their actions and thoughts. This allows room for personal agency within a deterministic framework.
graph LR
B["Behaviour"] --> E["Environment"]
E --> B
B --> P["Personal/Cognitive Factors"]
P --> B
E --> P
P --> E
Exam Tip: Soft determinism is often considered the most reasonable position because it acknowledges causation without denying personal agency. If asked to evaluate, explain why this middle-ground position is attractive.
Rogers (1951) and Maslow (1943) both emphasised free will. Rogers argued that humans have an innate tendency towards self-actualisation — the drive to fulfil one's potential. In person-centred therapy, the client (not the therapist) directs the therapeutic process, reflecting the belief that people are capable of making meaningful choices.
Maslow's hierarchy of needs also implies free will: once lower needs are met, individuals are free to pursue growth, creativity, and self-actualisation.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.