You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Observation is a research method in which the sociologist watches and records behaviour as it happens in a natural or controlled setting. In educational research, observation involves the researcher entering a school, classroom, or other educational environment to observe the interactions, practices, and processes that take place. Observation is particularly valued by interpretivist sociologists for its potential to produce highly valid, authentic data about the reality of school life. However, it also raises significant practical and ethical challenges, especially when the participants include children and young people.
| Type | Description | Role of Researcher |
|---|---|---|
| Participant observation | The researcher takes part in the activities of the group being studied, often over an extended period | Active member of the setting (e.g. acting as a teacher or support worker) |
| Non-participant observation | The researcher watches and records behaviour without taking part | Passive observer (e.g. sitting at the back of a classroom) |
| Overt observation | Participants know they are being observed | Researcher's role is declared openly |
| Covert observation | Participants do not know they are being observed | Researcher conceals their role |
| Structured observation | Researcher uses a pre-determined observation schedule with specific categories to record behaviour | Systematic recording of pre-defined behaviours |
| Unstructured observation | Researcher makes field notes about whatever they observe, without a fixed framework | Open-ended recording of events and interactions |
Key Definition: Participant observation — a research method in which the sociologist joins a group or community, participates in their daily activities, and observes their behaviour from within. In education, this typically involves spending extended time in a school, observing and sometimes participating in lessons, playground activities, and staff meetings.
Example: Stephen Ball (1981) was able to conduct overt participant observation at Beachside Comprehensive because he was already employed there as a teacher. His existing role gave him a legitimate presence and access to staffrooms, classrooms, and meetings. An outsider would have faced significant barriers to obtaining equivalent access.
| Role | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Teacher | Natural presence; full access to classrooms and staffrooms | Pupils may behave as they would with any teacher; power imbalance |
| Teaching assistant | Less authority than a teacher; can observe classroom dynamics | May be drawn into TA duties rather than observation |
| Volunteer / mentor | Can build rapport with pupils; less threatening than a teacher | May not have full access to all areas; limited authority |
| Supply teacher | Short-term access; can observe multiple classes | Lacks continuity needed for extended observation |
| Pupil (covert) | Observes from the pupil perspective; no Hawthorne effect | Only possible for younger researchers; serious ethical concerns; very difficult to maintain in practice |
The choice between covert and overt observation raises fundamental ethical questions:
| Overt Observation | Covert Observation | |
|---|---|---|
| Informed consent | Participants can give informed consent | No informed consent — participants are deceived about the researcher's true role |
| Hawthorne effect | Participants may alter their behaviour | Behaviour is more natural and authentic |
| Trust | Relationship is based on honesty | Relationship is based on deception — if discovered, trust is destroyed |
| BSA guidelines | Generally consistent with ethical guidelines | Conflicts with the principle of informed consent and the prohibition on deception |
| Children's vulnerability | Children can be told about the research (though understanding may be limited) | Observing children without their knowledge raises serious ethical concerns about exploitation and invasion of privacy |
Key Point: Covert observation of children in schools is considered highly ethically problematic by most sociologists. The vulnerability of children and the power dynamics in schools make deception particularly difficult to justify. However, some researchers argue that covert methods are the only way to observe naturally occurring behaviour without the distortions caused by the Hawthorne effect.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.