You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Dihybrid inheritance extends Mendelian analysis to two genes simultaneously. Where monohybrid crosses establish how single genes segregate, dihybrid crosses reveal how the segregation of one gene relates to that of another. Mendel's experiments with two-trait combinations in pea plants (seed shape × seed colour; pod colour × stem length) led him to the law of independent assortment: provided the two genes are located on different chromosomes, their alleles assort independently of one another during gamete formation. The result is the iconic 9:3:3:1 phenotypic ratio from a cross between two double heterozygotes — a ratio that is the signature of unlinked genes in dihybrid inheritance and one of the most heavily examined topics at A-Level.
Spec mapping: This lesson sits in AQA 7402 Section 3.7.1 — Inheritance, building directly on the monohybrid genetics of the previous lesson. The relevant content covers Mendel's second law (independent assortment), the use of dihybrid crosses to predict offspring ratios, the relationship between the 9:3:3:1 ratio and the underlying chromosomal mechanisms, and the chi-squared test for assessing whether observed offspring numbers fit the expected ratio. (Refer to the official AQA specification document for exact wording.)
Mendel's second law states that the alleles of different genes assort independently of one another during gamete formation, provided the genes are located on different chromosomes (i.e. they are unlinked).
The chromosomal basis is direct:
Mendel formulated this law without knowing about chromosomes; the cytological explanation came with Sutton and Boveri's chromosome theory of inheritance (1902–1903).
Key Point: Independent assortment only applies to genes on different chromosomes. Genes on the same chromosome are linked and tend to be inherited together. Recombination between linked genes occurs only by crossing over, the frequency of which depends on the distance between the loci (covered in the next lesson). Mendel's law is therefore not universal — it is true for unlinked genes only.
In pea plants, Mendel's original two-gene system involves:
These two genes are on different chromosomes, so they assort independently — Mendel's second law holds.
Cross: RrYy × RrYy (both parents are heterozygous for both genes)
Gametes from each parent: RY, Ry, rY, ry (four types of gamete, produced in equal proportions)
| RY | Ry | rY | ry | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RY | RRYY | RRYy | RrYY | RrYy |
| Ry | RRYy | RRyy | RrYy | Rryy |
| rY | RrYY | RrYy | rrYY | rrYy |
| ry | RrYy | Rryy | rrYy | rryy |
With complete dominance at both loci, the 16 offspring genotypes fall into four phenotypic classes determined by whether at least one dominant allele is present at each locus. The underscore notation (e.g. R_) means "either R or r" — the second allele can be anything without affecting the phenotype when the dominant allele is present.
From the 16 possible offspring:
| Phenotype | Genotypes | Count |
|---|---|---|
| Round, yellow | R_Y_ | 9 |
| Round, green | R_yy | 3 |
| Wrinkled, yellow | rrY_ | 3 |
| Wrinkled, green | rryy | 1 |
Expected phenotypic ratio: 9:3:3:1
This 9:3:3:1 ratio is the signature of a dihybrid cross with complete dominance at both loci and independent assortment.
Key Definition: The underscore notation (e.g., R_) means "either homozygous dominant or heterozygous" — the second allele can be either R or r without affecting the phenotype when the dominant allele is present.
Rather than drawing a full 4×4 Punnett square, the branch (forked-line) method uses the multiplication rule of independent probabilities. Because the two genes assort independently, the probability of any particular combined phenotype is the product of the individual probabilities.
For Rr × Rr: 3/4 round, 1/4 wrinkled For Yy × Yy: 3/4 yellow, 1/4 green
Combined probabilities:
This gives the 9:3:3:1 ratio without the need to enumerate 16 cells in a Punnett square. The branch method generalises easily: for a trihybrid cross (AaBbCc × AaBbCc), each gene independently gives 3/4 : 1/4 for its dominant/recessive phenotype, and the eight phenotypic classes have probabilities (3/4)³ : (3/4)²(1/4) : … through to (1/4)³, giving the 27:9:9:9:3:3:3:1 ratio.
Practical note: When the cross involves any homozygous parent at one locus (e.g. AaBb × AABb), the dihybrid is reduced — that locus produces only one gamete type from one parent — and the Punnett square collapses to a 2 × 4 or 4 × 1 grid. Calculate the expected ratio for each locus first, then combine.
In guinea pigs (a useful A-Level example because the two genes are on different chromosomes, so they assort independently):
Cross: BbSs × BbSs (both parents heterozygous at both loci)
Using the branch method:
| Phenotype | Probability | Ratio out of 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Black, short | 3/4 × 3/4 = 9/16 | 9 |
| Black, long | 3/4 × 1/4 = 3/16 | 3 |
| Brown, short | 1/4 × 3/4 = 3/16 | 3 |
| Brown, long | 1/4 × 1/4 = 1/16 | 1 |
This is the 9:3:3:1 phenotypic ratio. In a litter of 32 offspring (twice the ratio total) we would expect 18 black short, 6 black long, 6 brown short, 2 brown long — but small samples will fluctuate substantially.
A test cross for a dihybrid follows the same logic as a monohybrid test cross: cross the unknown individual with one whose genotype is fully recessive at both loci. The recessive parent provides only one type of gamete; the unknown parent's gametes are revealed directly in the offspring phenotypes.
The test cross involves crossing a double heterozygote (RrYy) with a double homozygous recessive (rryy).
Cross: RrYy × rryy
Gametes from RrYy: RY, Ry, rY, ry (equal proportions) Gametes from rryy: ry (only one type)
| ry | |
|---|---|
| RY | RrYy (round, yellow) |
| Ry | Rryy (round, green) |
| rY | rrYy (wrinkled, yellow) |
| ry | rryy (wrinkled, green) |
Expected phenotypic ratio: 1:1:1:1 (equal numbers of all four phenotypes)
This 1:1:1:1 ratio is the expected result when a dihybrid heterozygote is test-crossed with a homozygous recessive. Any deviation from this ratio suggests that the genes may be linked (on the same chromosome).
A cross between two tomato plants produces the following offspring:
Step 1: Calculate the ratio. 315 : 108 : 101 : 32 ≈ 9 : 3 : 3 : 1 (dividing through by the smallest class: 315/32 ≈ 9.8, 108/32 ≈ 3.4, 101/32 ≈ 3.2, 32/32 = 1)
Step 2: A 9:3:3:1 ratio is the signature of a dihybrid cross between two heterozygous parents with independent assortment and complete dominance at both loci.
Step 3: Determine dominance.
Step 4: Both parents must be TtRr (heterozygous for both genes). Their gametes are TR, Tr, tR, tr in equal proportions, and the Punnett square or branch method gives the 9:3:3:1 ratio.
Step 5 (optional verification): Apply the chi-squared test. Expected from a total of 556: 9/16 × 556 = 312.75; 3/16 × 556 = 104.25 (twice); 1/16 × 556 = 34.75. χ² = (315−312.75)²/312.75 + (108−104.25)²/104.25 + (101−104.25)²/104.25 + (32−34.75)²/34.75 ≈ 0.02 + 0.13 + 0.10 + 0.22 = 0.47. At 3 df, p = 0.05 critical value = 7.815. Since 0.47 ≪ 7.815, the deviation is far from statistically significant — the data strongly support the 9:3:3:1 hypothesis and therefore the model of two unlinked, completely-dominant genes.
The 9:3:3:1 ratio is the signature of unlinked, completely-dominant dihybrid inheritance. It depends on a checklist of assumptions:
If any of these conditions is violated, the observed ratio departs from 9:3:3:1 in characteristic ways:
| Cause | Typical observed ratio | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Linkage (genes on same chromosome) | Parental phenotypes over-represented; recombinants under-represented | Recombination frequency < 50% |
| Recessive epistasis (complementary) | 9:7 | Both dominant alleles needed for one phenotype |
| Recessive epistasis (with intermediate) | 9:3:4 | Homozygous recessive at one locus masks the other |
| Dominant epistasis | 12:3:1 | Dominant allele at one locus masks the other |
| Duplicate dominant epistasis | 15:1 | Dominant allele at either locus produces the same phenotype |
| Codominance at one locus | 6:3:3:2:1:1 or similar | Heterozygote phenotypically distinct from homozygotes |
| Selection / inviability | Class missing entirely | Lethal genotype eliminated |
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.