You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Writing is arguably the most cognitively demanding language skill children acquire, because it requires the simultaneous coordination of four separable competences: motor control (physically forming legible letters), transcription/spelling (mapping sounds to graphemes), grammar (constructing well-formed sentences) and composition (organising ideas into coherent, genre-appropriate whole texts). Unlike speech — which emerges given ordinary exposure — writing has to be explicitly taught, and mastery extends well beyond the eleven-year span of the AQA topic. Because Section B data can be spoken, written or multimodal, a piece of children's writing (a recount, a story, a card) is a standard stimulus, and you may be asked to compare writing with a same-child transcript. This lesson examines the precursors of writing, the major developmental models (Kroll, Rothery, Perera), invented spelling, genre development, and the features to analyse.
| Feature | Speaking | Writing |
|---|---|---|
| Acquisition | Emerges naturally through immersion and interaction | Requires explicit instruction and sustained practice |
| Age of onset | First words around 12 months | Recognisable writing typically from 4–5 years; composition much later |
| Permanence | Transient — disappears once spoken | Permanent — remains and can be re-read and revised |
| Feedback | Immediate — the listener can seek clarification | Delayed — the reader is typically absent |
| Context | Supported by gesture, intonation, facial expression, shared situation | Must build context through words alone (it is decontextualised) |
| Planning | Often spontaneous and unplanned | Typically planned, drafted and revised |
| Formality | Ranges from very informal to formal | Tends towards greater formality and explicitness |
Key Definition: Writing development — the process by which children learn to produce written text, from early mark-making to coherent, genre-appropriate, accurately spelled and grammatically organised composition. It integrates motor, spelling (transcription), grammatical and compositional skills, each on its own developmental timetable.
The single most important conceptual point — and the one examiners most reward — is that writing is decontextualised and permanent, whereas speech is contextualised and transient. The writer cannot rely on the shared "here and now", on gesture, or on the listener's immediate feedback; meaning must be made fully explicit on the page. This is precisely why mature writing must diverge from speech, and it is the engine behind Kroll's model below.
Long before recognisable writing, children engage in mark-making — using crayons or pens to make marks. This is a genuine precursor, not mere play, because it develops the motor control and the concept of leaving meaningful traces on a surface.
| Stage | Age (approx.) | Features |
|---|---|---|
| Scribbling | 1.5–3 years | Random marks; the child may "pretend" to write, producing wavy lines whose overall look mimics adult script |
| Mock writing | 3–4 years | Marks begin to resemble letters; the child "writes" left-to-right; mock writing is often mixed with drawing |
| Letter formation | 4–5 years | Recognisable letters appear, though inconsistent in size and orientation; the child grasps that letters stand for sounds |
| Conventional writing | 5–6+ years | Recognisable words and short sentences using conventional letters |
Emergent writing (or emergent literacy) names children's early, unconventional attempts before formal instruction. Crucially, it is evidence of conceptual development: the child is demonstrating a dawning understanding of three concepts of print —
A child who draws a picture and then adds a row of letter-like marks "to say what it is", or who points along their own mock-writing while "reading" it aloud, is displaying emergent literacy even though nothing is conventionally legible.
Key Definition: Emergent writing — the early, unconventional writing of young children (scribbling, mock writing, invented spelling, early letter formation) that reveals a developing grasp of the functions and conventions of written language, prior to formal teaching.
Barry Kroll (1981) proposed the model most frequently applied at A-Level, describing four phases that chart the changing relationship between a child's writing and their speech:
| Phase | Age (approx.) | Features |
|---|---|---|
| Preparation / preparatory | up to ~6 years | Basic motor skills and letter formation are acquired; the mechanics dominate; little independent composition |
| Consolidation | ~6–8 years | Writing closely resembles speech — informal, conversational tone; short, simple sentences; clauses chained with "and"; the child essentially writes as they talk |
| Differentiation | ~8 years onward | Writing begins to diverge from speech; the child recognises that written language has its own conventions; more formal structures emerge; growing awareness of genre and audience; guidance/feedback aids this shift |
| Integration | ~mid-teens (beyond the 0–11 span) | The writer can switch flexibly between spoken-like and written styles, controlling register and developing a personal voice for audience and purpose |
Key Definition: Kroll's phases (1981) — preparation → consolidation → differentiation → integration. The model's central insight is that children first write as they speak (consolidation) and must then differentiate writing from speech, learning that the written channel demands explicitness, formality and genre-appropriate organisation that ordinary conversation does not.
Kroll's pivotal claim is the move from consolidation to differentiation. In the consolidation phase, the very features that make speech work — informality, deixis, "and then... and then..." chaining — leak onto the page because the child has not yet grasped that the absent reader needs more. Typical speech-like (consolidation) features to look for in data include:
When a child instead begins to use subordination, temporal/causal connectives, consistent past tense for a recount, paragraphing and a more formal register, they are entering differentiation — the single most examinable transition in writing data.
Katharine Perera (1984) provided an influential linguistic analysis of children's writing development that complements Kroll. Perera emphasised the gradual emergence of grammatical complexity in writing, in particular the slow shift from coordination to subordination. Young writers begin with strings of simple and compound sentences (clauses joined by and, but, then); the capacity to embed subordinate clauses (relative clauses with who/which/that, adverbial clauses with because/when/although) develops later and is one of the clearest markers that writing is maturing beyond a speech-like base. Perera also drew on the recount/report/narrative genre distinctions developed in the same tradition as Rothery, stressing that chronological genres (recount, narrative) are mastered earlier than non-chronological ones (report, explanation, argument), because the latter require the writer to organise information by logical relationship rather than simply by time order — a more cognitively demanding task.
Key Definition: Perera's account (1984) — a linguistic description of children's writing development foregrounding the gradual growth of grammatical complexity, especially the move from clause coordination to subordination, and the earlier mastery of chronological over non-chronological text types.
A note of scholarly caution: A-Level textbooks also frequently cite Barclay (1996) for a seven-stage scheme (scribbling, mock handwriting, mock letters, conventional letters, invented spelling, appropriate spelling, correct spelling). This describes a sensible progression and can be used to frame a stage, but it is a less securely established reference than Kroll, Rothery and Perera, so lead with the latter three and treat Barclay as supplementary scaffolding rather than as a primary theoretical authority.
One of the most revealing aspects of early writing is invented spelling (also creative or developmental spelling). When children write words they have not been taught, they recruit their developing sound–letter knowledge to produce phonetically plausible spellings:
| Intended word | Invented spelling | Strategy used |
|---|---|---|
| "because" | "becoz" / "becuz" | Phonetic representation of the sounds |
| "school" | "skool" | Phonetic representation; regular oo pattern |
| "friend" | "frend" | Omission of an unpredictable/silent letter |
| "was" | "woz" | Phonetic spelling of the vowel |
| "said" | "sed" | Phonetic spelling (regularising an irregular word) |
| "night" | "nite" | Simplifying a complex orthographic string |
| "elephant" | "elefant" | Phoneme-consistent substitution (ph → f) |
Far from being failure, invented spelling is a positive developmental sign, and you should always analyse rather than dismiss it. It demonstrates that:
Key Definition: Invented spelling — the phonetically plausible, unconventional spellings produced when young children apply their developing grapheme–phoneme knowledge to unmemorised words. Like overgeneralisation in speech, it is evidence of rule application, and signals movement through the alphabetic stage of literacy.
A productive analytical move is to link invented spelling to Frith's alphabetic phase (covered in the Reading lesson): a child spelling "nite" for "night" is using the same grapheme–phoneme strategy in writing that drives decoding in reading, since Frith argued the strategies cross over between the two skills.
Joan Rothery (1984), working within Australian genre-based research, identified four recurring categories (genres) in children's school writing, forming a rough developmental sequence of increasing structural demand:
| Category | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Observation / comment | Simple labelling or a single evaluative remark | "This is my cat." / "I like dogs." |
| Recount | A chronological retelling, usually of personal experience | "On Saturday I went to the park. I played on the swings. Then I had an ice cream." |
| Narrative | A story with characters, a complication and a resolution | "Once there was a rabbit. One day he got lost in the forest. He was scared but then his mummy found him." |
| Report | A non-chronological, factual, topic-organised text | "Dogs are pets. They have four legs. They like bones and walks." |
Key Definition: Rothery's categories (1984) — observation/comment → recount → narrative → report, a classification of children's writing genres showing a progression from simple labelling, through time-ordered recount and story, to the more demanding non-chronological report. Mastering genre means learning to structure whole texts, not merely to spell and form sentences.
The deep point Rothery makes is that writing development is not only about transcription (letters and spelling) but about text-level organisation: a child may spell accurately yet still produce a shapeless recount, or write a well-shaped narrative riddled with invented spellings. Analysing the genre and how well it meets generic conventions is therefore a distinct analytical layer from analysing spelling or sentence grammar.
As children move through primary school they meet, and learn to produce, an expanding repertoire of genres, each with characteristic structural and linguistic features:
| Genre | Key features | Age typically emerging |
|---|---|---|
| Labels and captions | Single words/phrases with pictures | 4–5 years |
| Recount | Chronological; past tense; temporal connectives (then, next, after that) | 5–6 years |
| Simple narrative | Orientation → complication → resolution; past tense; characters | 5–7 years |
| Instructions | Imperative mood; sequenced/numbered steps; second person | 6–7 years |
| Non-chronological report | Present tense; third person; factual; organised by topic not time | 7–8 years |
| Persuasive writing | Rhetorical devices; emotive language; modal verbs; reason connectives | 8–9 years |
| Explanation | Causal connectives (because, therefore, so); present tense; logical sequence | 8–10 years |
| Discussion / argument | Balanced viewpoints; evidence; formal register; hedging | 10+ years |
The mastery of genre tracks cognitive and pragmatic development. To write a report or an argument, the child must decentre — hold the absent reader in mind and organise material for that reader's needs rather than narrating egocentrically. This connects to Piaget's shift from egocentric to decentred thought, and to the wider development of audience awareness: explicit teaching of genre conventions (structure, typical grammar, purpose) has repeatedly been shown to improve children's writing precisely because it makes these otherwise invisible reader-oriented demands teachable.
A powerful way to understand children's writing — and to structure an analysis — is to separate the two broad demands writing makes, sometimes captured in the "Simple View of Writing":
The key insight is that, for a young child, transcription is not yet automatic, and because attention and working memory are limited, effort spent on forming letters and working out spellings is effort not available for composing. This is why a 6-year-old's story may be simultaneously imaginative in intention yet thin and disjointed on the page: the cognitive cost of transcription crowds out composition. As transcription becomes automatic — letters formed without thought, common words spelled from memory — capacity is freed for the authorial work of planning, structuring and revising. This trade-off explains several features you will see in data: very short texts, abandoned sentences, and writing that is far less sophisticated than the same child's speech, because speaking carries no transcription burden at all. It also reframes "messy" early writing sympathetically: the child is managing an extraordinary multi-tasking load that fluent adult writers have long since automated.
Key Definition: Transcription and composition — the two strands of writing skill. Transcription covers handwriting and spelling (the mechanics); composition covers idea generation, organisation and genre. Because transcription is effortful for young children and competes for limited cognitive resources, early composition is often constrained until the mechanics become automatic.
Spelling is not a single skill that is simply "right" or "wrong" but a developing system that passes through describable phases as the child's strategy changes — a progression that complements Frith's reading phases. A broadly accepted sequence runs:
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.