You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Deixis (from the Greek deiktikos, "pointing" or "showing") is one of the central concepts in pragmatics — the study of meaning in context. Deictic expressions are words and phrases whose interpretation depends entirely on the context of utterance: on who is speaking, where they are, and when they are speaking. Strip away that context and the expressions become uninterpretable. This is precisely why deixis marks the frontier between semantics (context-independent, conventional meaning) and pragmatics (context-dependent, situated meaning): the word "here" has a stable semantic meaning ("the place of the speaker"), but its actual referent shifts with every new speaker and location. As with every method on the AQA specification, the analysis of deixis is integrated across Paper 1, Paper 2 and the NEA, and its primary objective is AO1, with the strongest answers reaching AO3 through attention to how deixis positions readers and encodes relationships of power.
Consider the sentence: "I will meet you here tomorrow."
This cannot be fully understood without knowing:
The words "I", "you", "here" and "tomorrow" are all deictic expressions (or indexicals): they "point to" coordinates of the context and can be resolved only relative to it. Linguists call the anchoring point the deictic centre — the default "I–here–now" of the speaker, to which all deictic reference is relative.
Key Definition: Deixis — the phenomenon whereby certain expressions derive their reference from the context of utterance, "pointing to" the participants, location, or time of the speech event. Deictic expressions include personal pronouns, demonstratives, temporal and spatial adverbs, and certain verbs of motion.
The most influential systematic account is Stephen Levinson's in Pragmatics (1983), which built on earlier work and set out the categories used below. The traditional triad — person, place (spatial) and time (temporal) deixis — is conventionally extended with two further categories, social and discourse (text) deixis.
Person deixis encodes the roles of participants in the speech event:
Pronoun choice encodes information about identity, relationships and power:
In political and persuasive discourse, the strategic deployment of "we" is one of the richest sites for analysis. When a leader declares "we must act now", the indeterminacy of "we" — the government? the party? the nation? humanity? — is frequently cultivated, allowing the speaker to claim consensus and dissolve the boundary between themselves and their audience. The technique of using inclusive "we" to forge an in-group ("we, the British people") while an unnamed "they" supplies the out-group is a staple of rhetoric worth naming explicitly in an answer.
Two further uses of person deixis deserve mention. The so-called "royal we" (the majestic plural) and the editorial "we" of journalism allow a single speaker or writer to present their voice as that of an institution, lending it weight and impersonal authority. Conversely, the generic "they" — "they say it's going to rain", "they keep changing the rules" — invokes a vague, unnamed authority or collective, and is analytically interesting precisely because its referent is left deliberately unspecified, allowing a speaker to attribute claims or blame without committing to a source. Third-person reference more broadly can be used to objectify or distance: describing people consistently in the third person, or by category rather than name ("the claimants", "the migrants"), holds them at arm's length as objects of discussion rather than participants in the conversation. Each of these choices positions participants relative to one another, and naming the specific device — royal "we", generic "they", third-person distancing — is far stronger than a generic remark about pronouns.
Place deixis encodes spatial location relative to the deictic centre — the speaker's position at the moment of utterance. The fundamental opposition is between proximal (near the speaker) and distal (far from the speaker) forms:
| Proximal (near speaker) | Distal (far from speaker) |
|---|---|
| "here" | "there" |
| "this" | "that" |
| "these" | "those" |
| "come" | "go" |
| "bring" | "take" |
The motion verbs are easy to overlook: "come" and "bring" encode movement towards the deictic centre, while "go" and "take" encode movement away from it. "Come here" and "go there" are deictically opposite instructions.
Spatial deixis can manufacture psychological proximity or distance as readily as physical:
The proximal/distal contrast can therefore be wielded to draw some referents into the in-group and push others out — a spatial enactment of the same us/them dynamic seen in person deixis.
Time deixis encodes time relative to the moment of utterance — the "now" of the deictic centre.
| Deictic Expression | Meaning |
|---|---|
| "now" | at the time of speaking |
| "then" | at a time other than the time of speaking |
| "today" | the day of speaking |
| "yesterday" | the day before the day of speaking |
| "tomorrow" | the day after the day of speaking |
| "last week / month / year" | the period before the time of speaking |
| "next week / month / year" | the period after the time of speaking |
| "ago" | a specified interval before the time of speaking |
Tense is itself a grammaticalised form of time deixis: the past tense locates events before the moment of speaking, the present tense at it, and future/modal constructions after it. Because temporal deictics are anchored to "now", they fail in any context where the moment of utterance is uncertain — which is why a note reading "back in an hour" is useless without knowing when it was written.
Temporal deixis is central to narrative analysis. A switch from past tense into the historic present ("So I walk into the room and there he is…") drags past events up to the moment of telling, lending vividness and immediacy. Headlines exploit the same effect — the present-tense "Prime Minister resigns" reports a completed event as if unfolding live, manufacturing urgency.
Temporal deixis also raises the important issue of the coding time versus the receiving time of a message. In face-to-face speech these coincide: "now" means the shared present of speaker and hearer. But in writing and recorded media they come apart. A note that reads "I'll be back in five minutes" is anchored to the coding time (when it was written) and may mislead a reader who arrives at a different receiving time. Broadcasters who say "good evening" record the greeting at one moment for an audience that receives it at many. Skilled writers exploit this dislocation: a columnist who writes "as I type these words, the votes are still being counted" deliberately foregrounds the coding time to manufacture a sense of live immediacy, even though the reader encounters the piece much later. Recognising whether a text's temporal deixis is anchored to coding or receiving time, and how the gap between them is exploited, is a subtle and high-value observation, especially for digital and broadcast genres.
Social deixis encodes social relationships, relative status and formality between participants. It includes:
Key Definition: Social deixis — the encoding, through linguistic form, of social relationships, status differences and relative formality between interlocutors.
Social deixis lays bare power relations. The asymmetrical use of address terms — a doctor calling a patient "Mary" while the patient must respond with "Dr Jones" — encodes and reproduces a status differential without anyone naming it. In historical and dramatic texts, a speaker's switch between "thou" and "you" can signal a shift into intimacy, an act of condescension, or an assertion of hierarchy, and is always worth close reading.
The analysis of address terms repays careful attention because they form a finely graded system. At one end sit highly deferential forms ("Your Honour", "Professor Smith", "sir"); at the other, intimate or solidary ones (first names, diminutives such as "Johnny", endearments such as "love" or "mate"). A useful concept here is the distinction between reciprocal and non-reciprocal address. Reciprocal address — both parties using the same level of formality, whether both first names or both titles — signals symmetry and equality of status. Non-reciprocal address — one party using a familiar form while receiving a deferential one — encodes and enacts a power difference, and the direction of the asymmetry tells you who holds the higher status. Historically, the "thou/you" system worked in just this way: a superior might address an inferior with familiar "thou" while expecting respectful "you" in return. Modern English, lacking the pronoun distinction, carries this work largely through names, titles and endearments instead. When you analyse a transcript or dialogue, mapping who addresses whom with which forms — and whether the pattern is reciprocal or asymmetrical — produces a precise picture of the social and power relations at play, and is far stronger than a general comment that the language is "formal" or "informal".
Discourse deixis uses deictic expressions to point to other parts of the same text or discourse, rather than to the external world.
Discourse deixis builds textual cohesion, knitting parts of a text together and steering the reader through its structure. It shades into the related cohesive concept of reference, to which we now turn.
A foundational distinction in cohesion concerns where a referring expression sends us for its meaning. Endophoric reference points inside the text; exophoric reference points outside it, to the situational context. Endophora subdivides into anaphora (pointing back) and cataphora (pointing forward).
We can lay the relations out as a hierarchy:
Anaphora (anaphoric reference) occurs when an expression refers back to something already mentioned. The earlier expression is the antecedent.
Key Definition: Anaphora — endophoric reference in which an expression (typically a pronoun) points back to a previously mentioned entity, its antecedent.
Cataphora (cataphoric reference) occurs when an expression refers forward to something not yet mentioned. Rarer than anaphora, it generates suspense and anticipation by withholding the identity of the referent.
Key Definition: Cataphora — endophoric reference in which an expression points forward to something mentioned later, creating anticipation or suspense. A favourite opening device in fiction and feature journalism.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.