You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Psychoanalytic criticism reads literature through the lens of the unconscious mind. Its founding premise is that a literary text, like a dream, is shaped by desires, anxieties, and conflicts that operate beneath the surface of conscious intention — and that close attention to imagery, symbol, repetition, and slippage can bring this hidden material to light. This lesson teaches the lens carefully: the core Freudian and Lacanian concepts (the structure of the psyche, the Oedipus complex, repression, the uncanny, the mirror stage, the Symbolic Order), Kristeva's concept of abjection, where they come from, and — crucially — how to use them without reducing a crafted work to a case study.
As a lens, psychoanalytic criticism serves AO5 by giving you a distinctive vocabulary of interpretation, especially powerful for analysing character, motivation, and the reader's own unsettling responses. It depends on AO2 — psychoanalytic reading is close reading, of symbol and image above all — and on AO1 textual evidence and personal voice. It bears on AO3 in a double sense: psychoanalysis is itself a historical phenomenon (turn-of-the-century Vienna), and the question of how far its concepts travel to other periods and cultures is a live contextual issue. The standing risk this lesson guards against is twofold: collapsing the text into the author's biography, and treating an unfalsifiable interpretation as a proven fact.
It is reasonable to ask why a theory of the mind, developed in a clinic, should illuminate works of fiction. The answer lies in a deep structural kinship that Freud himself noticed: literature and the unconscious work in strikingly similar ways. Both speak in symbol rather than statement; both condense several meanings into a single image and displace feeling from one object to another; both circle obsessively around what they cannot say directly. A dream disguises a forbidden wish so that the sleeper can keep sleeping; a literary text, on this view, gives shape to desires and anxieties — the author's, the culture's, the reader's — that could not be confronted head-on. This is why psychoanalytic critics treat the techniques of literature (imagery, repetition, symbolism, the uncanny) as continuous with the techniques of the dream-work.
There are, broadly, three things a psychoanalytic critic might choose to analyse, and it matters which you mean. The first is the author — reading the work as a clue to the writer's psyche. This is the oldest and least defensible approach at A-Level, because it confuses a crafted artefact with a transcript of the maker's mind, and because you rarely have the biographical evidence to do it responsibly. The second is the character — reading figures in the text as if they had unconscious lives, which is illuminating provided you remember that characters are constructs, not patients. The third, and most sophisticated, is the reader and the text itself — asking why a work disturbs, grips, or haunts us, and how its very form (a split narrator, a recurring symbol, an unresolved ending) produces those effects. The strongest A-Level work tends to operate in the second and third registers, and to be wary of the first.
Keeping these three objects distinct is itself a mark of critical maturity, and it pre-empts the most common objection to the whole enterprise — that it merely psychoanalyses people who do not exist. You are not diagnosing Hamlet; you are using a vocabulary of unconscious process to read how Shakespeare's play behaves — why it generates its peculiar atmosphere of paralysis, disgust, and delay. That shift, from diagnosis to reading, is what makes the lens legitimate.
Freud did not write academic literary criticism, but his model of the mind has had an incalculable influence on how we read. The key concepts you need are these.
In his later "structural model" (The Ego and the Id, 1923), Freud divided the psyche into three agencies:
| Component | Function | Literary application |
|---|---|---|
| Id | The wholly unconscious reservoir of instinctual drives, governed by the "pleasure principle" — it seeks immediate gratification regardless of consequence | Characters driven by appetite, aggression, or compulsion — Heathcliff, Stanley Kowalski |
| Ego | The largely conscious, reality-testing self that mediates between the id's demands and the external world, governed by the "reality principle" | Characters who calculate, strategise, and compromise — Pip, Nick Carraway |
| Superego | The internalised moral authority — conscience and the ego-ideal — formed from parental and social prohibition; the voice of "you should" and "you must not" | Characters tormented by guilt or duty — Hamlet, Angel Clare, the narrator of Spies |
A note on accuracy: the drives the id pursues are commonly summarised as the life drive (Eros) and the death drive. Freud developed this dualism in Beyond the Pleasure Principle (1920); the label "Thanatos" for the death drive was popularised by his followers rather than used routinely by Freud himself. Treat Eros/Thanatos as a useful shorthand for the conflict between desire and destruction, not as a phrase to attribute to Freud verbatim.
Application: In Othello, Iago can be read as a dramatisation of Othello's id — the externalised voice of repressed jealousy and sexual anxiety. The tragedy is that Othello's superego (his honour, his self-image as "the noble Moor") cannot master the unconscious forces Iago activates: the "green-eyed monster" devours the reality principle, and the ego collapses between them.
Definition: Freud argued (drawing on Sophocles, and developed across The Interpretation of Dreams, 1900, onward) that in early childhood the child desires the parent of the opposite sex and experiences the same-sex parent as a rival. The "resolution" of this conflict — through identification with the same-sex parent and repression of the forbidden wish — is, on his account, foundational to adult identity and conscience.
Application: Ernest Jones, in Hamlet and Oedipus (1949), explained Hamlet's notorious delay as an Oedipal paralysis: Hamlet cannot bring himself to kill Claudius because Claudius has enacted Hamlet's own repressed infantile wishes — to remove the father and possess the mother. On this reading Claudius is less Hamlet's enemy than his uncanny double, and the prince's revulsion at his mother's bed ("In the rank sweat of an enseamed bed") betrays a disturbance that exceeds ordinary disgust.
A-Level Caution: The Oedipal reading of Hamlet is influential but contested. Deploy it as one interpretation among several — its value is heuristic, opening the play's strange intensity around Gertrude — not as the definitive solution to the delay.
Definition: In his essay "The Uncanny" (Das Unheimliche, 1919), Freud analysed the peculiar dread produced by something at once familiar and strange. He noted that the German unheimlich ("unhomely") shadows its opposite heimlich ("homely," but also "secret"), and argued that the uncanny arises when something repressed and long familiar returns in an estranged form — doubles, the animation of the inanimate, involuntary repetition, the sense of being haunted.
Application: Gothic and quasi-Gothic literature trades in the uncanny — doubles, ghosts, haunted houses, the return of the dead. In Spies, the childhood memories that surface in old Stephen are uncanny in exactly Freud's sense: the "unheimlich" smell of the privet ("the smell of leaves and stove-warmed dust") makes the homely suburban Close suddenly unhomely, familiar and frightening at once, as a repressed wartime summer forces its way back.
Definition: Repression is the unconscious mechanism by which unacceptable wishes, memories, and thoughts are pushed out of consciousness. But the repressed does not vanish; it returns in disguised forms — dreams, symptoms, slips of the tongue (parapraxes), compulsive repetition, and, on this view, literature itself.
Application: In Waterland, Tom Crick's compulsive history-telling can be read as the return of the repressed. He cannot stop narrating his past because that past — Freddie Parr's death, Mary's botched abortion, the question of Dick's incestuous origins — has been repressed and is forcing its way back. The novel's very form, circling obsessively over the same Fenland traumas, enacts the compulsion to repeat.
Freud called dreams "the royal road to the unconscious" and described the "dream-work" that disguises forbidden material chiefly through condensation (fusing several meanings into a single image) and displacement (transferring emotional charge from a significant object onto a trivial one). Literature deploys the same symbolic logic.
Application: The paper lantern in A Streetcar Named Desire works like a dream symbol through condensation: it is at once Blanche's softening of harsh light, her need for illusion, her fading beauty, and her attempt to make an ugly world bearable. When Stanley tears it from the bulb near the end, the act condenses literal and symbolic violence — the stripping of illusion is also the stripping of the woman.
Lacan reread Freud through structural linguistics and philosophy, insisting that "the unconscious is structured like a language." His work is notoriously difficult; two concepts are especially useful at A-Level.
Definition: In "The Mirror Stage" (a paper delivered in 1949), Lacan argued that the infant (roughly between six and eighteen months) achieves its first sense of a unified self by identifying with its reflection. But this is a méconnaissance, a misrecognition: the coherent image in the mirror contradicts the infant's lived experience of fragmentation and helplessness. Identity is therefore founded, from the start, on an alienating ideal image — a self one identifies with but is not.
Application: Gatsby's self-creation — the manufacture of "Jay Gatsby" out of "James Gatz" — can be read as a Lacanian misrecognition writ large. Gatsby fashions an ideal image and then spends his life trying to coincide with it. The green light is the perfected mirror: an image of the ideal self (and the ideal beloved) forever across the water, "the orgastic future that year by year recedes before us." Identity here is the pursuit of an image that, by definition, cannot be reached.
Definition: For Lacan, to enter language is to enter the Symbolic Order — a pre-existing system of rules, categories, names, and meanings (and, he adds, of patriarchal law, "the Name of the Father"). Language does not express a pre-formed self; it constitutes the subject. We are, in this sense, "spoken by" language as much as we speak it.
Application: In The Handmaid's Tale, Gilead's control of language — the mandated greetings ("Blessed be the fruit"), the patronymic renaming ("Offred" = "Of-Fred"), the prohibition on women reading — is an assault on the Symbolic Order itself: to govern naming is to govern identity. Offred's resistance is therefore linguistic — her secret etymologies and puns ("I sit at the small table, eating... There must be some resistance, some help"), her hoarded memories of "the time before," her refusal to accept Gilead's definitions. Her narration is a struggle within and against the Symbolic Order that is trying to write her.
Kristeva extended the psychoanalytic tradition in directions that are especially useful for Gothic, tragic, and horror-inflected texts. Her most exam-portable concept is abjection, developed in Powers of Horror (1980). The "abject" is what we must expel in order to maintain the boundaries of the self — bodily wastes, the corpse, decay, anything that confronts us with the breakdown of the line between self and other, inside and outside, living and dead. The abject is not simply disgusting; it both repels and fascinates, because it reminds us that the clean, bounded self is a fragile achievement always threatening to dissolve. The corpse, Kristeva writes, is "the utmost of abjection" — death "infecting life."
Application: Abjection illuminates moments of literary horror that simple "disgust" cannot. In A Streetcar Named Desire, Blanche's terror of the body's decay — her flight from harsh light, her compulsive bathing, her horror of the "epic fornications" of her family's decline — can be read as a struggle against the abject, against everything bodily and mortal that threatens the immaculate self she performs. In Gothic and tragic texts more broadly, the corpse, the ruin, the diseased body, and the boundary-crossing monster all trade on abjection: they grip us precisely because they breach the borders by which we hold ourselves together. Where the uncanny explains the dread of the familiar-made-strange, abjection explains the dread of the boundary dissolved — a distinct and precise tool for a distinct kind of textual moment.
Both Freud and Lacan place desire at the centre — not merely sexual desire but the structural human condition of wanting what one lacks. For Lacan especially, desire is sustained by its object's unattainability. Literature, on this view, is driven by desire:
| Text | Desire | Psychoanalytic reading |
|---|---|---|
| The Great Gatsby | Daisy / the green light | Desire for an idealised object that is "already lost"; the object exists to be pursued, not possessed |
| Othello | The craving for sexual certainty | The impossibility of knowing another's desire; jealousy as a narcissistic wound that demands "ocular proof" it can never have |
| A Streetcar Named Desire | Blanche's hunger for love, beauty, youth | Desire as both life-force and self-destruction — the very name of the streetcar fuses Eros and the drive toward death |
| The Handmaid's Tale | Offred's longing for freedom, her daughter, touch | Desire as resistance — the body's wants remaining stubbornly subversive of total control |
Psychoanalytic criticism concerns not only characters but the reader's response. Why do some texts disturb us so precisely? Why do we identify with the figures we do? Why do certain images haunt us long after we close the book?
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.