You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The period from 1945 to the present has seen fundamental transformations in attitudes towards gender and sexuality. Literature has both reflected and driven these changes — challenging conventions, imagining alternatives, and giving voice to experiences that were previously silenced or stigmatised. This lesson examines two novels centrally concerned with gender, sexuality, and social change: Jeanette Winterson's Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit (1985) and Richard Yates's Revolutionary Road (1961).
Both are in-copyright modern texts, and the quotations that circulate in study guides are often misremembered. The few phrases quoted below have been checked against the texts; everything else is analysed in precise prose without quotation marks. You should do likewise — an accurate account of how a passage works always beats a doubtful quotation, which fails AO1 (accuracy of reference) and undermines the AO2 built on it.
Paper 2, Texts in Shared Contexts: Option 2B, Modern Times (1945–present). Gender-and-sexuality fiction tracks one of the option's defining historical movements — the long, non-linear transformation in the legal and social position of women and of sexual minorities since 1945 — and the texts are studied in connection, so comparison is structural. The objectives align as follows:
A useful rule for this lesson: gender in these texts is not a fixed fact but a performance under pressure. The strongest answers analyse how a social system enforces a role and what it costs to refuse it — and fasten that analysis to the specific form each writer chose.
| Decade | Key Developments |
|---|---|
| 1950s | Rigid post-war gender roles; homosexuality criminalised; the "feminine mystique" — Betty Friedan's later term for the idealisation of suburban domesticity that confined educated women to the home |
| 1960s | Sexual revolution; the contraceptive pill (available from 1961); decriminalisation of homosexuality between men in England and Wales (Sexual Offences Act 1967); the rise of second-wave feminism |
| 1970s | The women's liberation movement; the Gay Liberation Front (1970); the emergence of feminist literary criticism; consciousness-raising groups |
| 1980s | Section 28 (enacted 1988) — prohibited the "promotion" of homosexuality by local authorities; the AIDS crisis; Thatcher's appeal to "Victorian values"; a conservative backlash against feminism |
| 1990s–2000s | Queer theory (Judith Butler's Gender Trouble, 1990); civil partnerships (2004); growing visibility of LGBTQ+ lives |
| 2010s–present | Marriage equality (2014 in England, Wales and Scotland); debates over trans rights; the #MeToo movement; the continuing contestation of gender norms |
The crucial AO3 point is that this story does not run in a straight line from repression to liberation. The 1980s, in which Oranges was written, were in several respects a period of reaction — the Right reasserting traditional family values, Section 28 looming — even as the longer arc bent towards greater freedom. A novel published in 1961 and a novel published in 1985 therefore register "gender" in radically different keys, and part of your AO3 skill is hearing which moment in this non-linear history each text speaks from.
Winterson grew up in Accrington, Lancashire, in a strict evangelical Pentecostal household. Oranges is a semi-autobiographical first novel — its protagonist shares the author's first name — drawing on her experience of growing up as a lesbian within a fiercely religious working-class community. It was published in 1985, the same year as Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale, at a moment when the political Right was reasserting "traditional values" and the legislative attack on gay visibility that became Section 28 was gathering. Read in that context, the novel's reversal of the usual moral verdict — making the persecuting community, not the gay child, the aberration — is a pointed contemporary intervention, not merely a private memoir.
The novel's eight chapters are named, in order, after the first eight books of the Old Testament: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges and Ruth. The device is richly ironic: Winterson borrows the Bible's own organising architecture to tell a story that dismantles biblical authority over sexuality and selfhood, and the choice of Ruth — a book centred on devoted love between two women — to close the sequence is a quiet act of reclamation.
Interspersed with the realist narrative are fairy tales, myths and allegorical episodes — quests, transformations, enchantments. These inset stories do three kinds of work:
Jeanette's mother — charismatic, domineering, theatrically certain — wields religion as a system of total control. The church offers real love and belonging, but strictly on condition of absolute conformity; when Jeanette's sexuality is discovered, she is subjected to an exorcism, a literal attempt to cast out what the community has defined as demonic. The mother's whole cast of mind is binary, and Winterson fixes it in one devastatingly economical sentence: "She had never heard of mixed feelings. There were friends and there were enemies" (a verified phrase). The flat, childlike simplicity of the syntax performs the worldview it describes — a universe sorted cleanly into saved and damned, with no middle ground for ambiguity, complexity or difference. The novel's entire hybrid form, with its competing narratives and refusal of one authoritative voice, is the formal antithesis of that binary, so that structure and theme argue the same case.
Jeanette's lesbianism is presented not as a problem to be solved or a crisis to be survived but as a natural, integral strand of who she is — continuous with her intelligence, her independence and her imaginative gift. The novel pointedly refuses the conventional "coming-out-as-trauma" plot. Instead, it relocates the pathology: the aberration is the community's response — the exorcism, the isolation, the demand that she repent — not her desire. Winterson inverts the inherited moral framework so that it is the persecutors who are shown to be damaged, the child who is whole.
The book is saturated with stories — scripture, fairy tale, family myth, personal narrative — and it makes storytelling a site of power. Jeanette's mother governs reality by narrating it: she revises the past, conjures enemies, and casts herself as the perpetual heroine of her own legend. Jeanette's liberation, correspondingly, consists in claiming the right to tell her own story in her own voice. The novel's hybrid form (realism braided with fairy tale and myth) embodies the claim: experience can be narrated more than one way, and no single account holds a monopoly on truth.
A-Level Analysis: The title is itself a thesis about narrative and difference. Oranges are not the only fruit — there are many fruits, many ways to live, many stories to tell. The mother's compulsive reliance on oranges (she presses one on Jeanette whenever the girl is distressed, as though an orange were the universal remedy) becomes the emblem of a worldview so narrow it can imagine only one good, one answer, one permitted shape of life.
Crucially, the novel is not a simple repudiation of religion. Jeanette's church gives her genuine warmth, structure, purpose and identity, and the pain of her expulsion is unfeigned: she loses not merely a belief system but a family, a community and a sense of belonging. Winterson's honesty here — that liberation from an oppressive community is also a real bereavement — is what saves the book from polemic and gives it tragic depth.
Oranges belongs to, and rewrites, the Bildungsroman — the novel of formation that traces a protagonist's growth from childhood to self-knowledge. Traditionally a masculine form, the genre is here claimed for a working-class lesbian girl, and that claim is itself political: Winterson asserts that such a life is a fit subject for the novel of education and self-discovery. But she remakes the form as much as she inherits it. Where the classic Bildungsroman tends to end in the protagonist's reconciliation with society, Oranges ends in a far more ambivalent return: Jeanette goes back to visit her mother and the community, changed and unassimilated, neither fully reconciled nor fully free. The inset fairy tales push the genre further still, towards the Künstlerroman — the novel of the artist's formation — because Jeanette's deepest development is precisely her growth into a storyteller, a maker of alternative narratives. The form thus enacts the theme: the heroine is educated not into her community's single truth but into the freedom to tell many stories, and the hybrid shape of the book is the proof of what she has become. For AO5 this lets you read the novel through Showalter's gynocriticism as a female Bildungsroman that reclaims a male tradition for a silenced experience; for AO4 it connects pointedly to the wider option's preoccupation with who is granted the authority to narrate.
| Technique | Effect |
|---|---|
| First-person narration | Creates intimacy and identification, and the child's-eye view renders the community's beliefs at once vivid and estranged, so that the reader sees their strangeness as the child cannot |
| Inset fairy tales | Offer allegorical commentary, challenge single-narrative authority, and build a layered, hybrid text whose very form resists univocal control |
| Irony and humour | Comedy exposes the absurdity of the community without anaesthetising its cruelty; the mother is simultaneously terrifying and hilarious |
| Biblical chapter-structure | Deploys the Bible's own framework against itself, an extended structural irony that culminates in the love-between-women of Ruth |
Yates published Revolutionary Road in 1961, at the apex of American suburban prosperity. The novel is a merciless critique of the mid-century American Dream as it was actually lived — the dream of suburban domesticity, material comfort and social conformity — which Yates exposes as spiritually deadening. Written two years before Friedan named the "feminine mystique", it diagnoses the same malaise from inside, and its first audiences read it amid the very culture of company-man commuting and idealised housewifery that it anatomises.
Frank and April Wheeler are a young couple in a Connecticut suburb who flatter themselves that they are superior to their neighbours — more intelligent, more sophisticated, more alive. April proposes that the family decamp to Paris, where she will work and Frank can find his "real" vocation. The plan collapses; April dies after a self-administered abortion; Frank is left in the suburbs, diminished and defeated. The arc is one of aspiration exposed as self-deception and then extinguished.
April Wheeler embodies the crisis Betty Friedan would identify two years later in The Feminine Mystique (1963) as "the problem that has no name" — the inarticulate desperation of educated, capable women confined to domesticity. April is intelligent and once aspired to act, but the role of suburban wife and mother offers her no meaningful identity of her own.
| April's situation | Friedan's analysis |
|---|---|
| Gave up acting for marriage and motherhood | Women are taught that fulfilment lies in domesticity |
| Feels empty, restless, unfulfilled | "The problem that has no name" — despair born of the gap between women's capacities and their prescribed role |
| The Paris plan is her bid for self-realisation | Women who seek meaning outside the home are labelled neurotic or selfish |
| Her death follows the failure of that bid | The system offers no viable exit for the woman who cannot conform |
The point worth pressing for AO2 is that Yates dramatises this not through April's self-pity but through the dialogue's evasions: April can rarely say plainly what is wrong, because the culture has given her no legitimate language for it — which is precisely Friedan's "no name".
Frank is no freer. He performs a masculinity — breadwinner, commuter, capable husband — that he privately despises but cannot relinquish. His affair, his fantasies of being exceptional, and above all his panicked retreat from the Paris plan once it becomes real, expose a man terrified of authentic change and addicted to the flattering image of himself as a frustrated rebel.
A-Level Analysis: Yates insists that the 1950s gender system damaged men as well as women. Frank's masculinity is a mask he wears to function in a society that rewards conformity and punishes authenticity, and his particular tragedy is one of self-knowledge without courage: he knows the mask is a mask, yet cannot take it off. This is a more corrosive condition than April's, because it is sustained by bad faith rather than mere confinement.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.