You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Love and time are inseparable in the anchor texts: love is remembered, idealised, mourned, and — fatally — sought again in a past that cannot be recovered. Nostalgia (from the Greek nostos, "homecoming," and algos, "pain") is the ache of longing for a lost time, and in all three novels it is presented as both powerful and dangerous. Gatsby tries literally to repeat the past and is destroyed by it; Heathcliff's love survives Catherine's death only to deform into a haunted, vengeful obsession; Tess is pursued and finally undone by a past she can neither escape nor undo. This lesson examines retrospection, memory and the distortions of nostalgia, and connects the novel's handling of love-in-time to the elegiac and memorial strain in love poetry.
Spec Mapping — Paper 1, Section C: prose (Love Through the Ages comparison). The dominant AOs are AO2 (how narrative structure — retrospection, the symbol that holds memory, the love that outlives death — shapes meaning) and AO4 (connecting the novel's love-in-time to elegy and memorial poetry). AO1 supplies terminology (nostalgia, retrospection, elegy, symbol, the past tense as a tense of loss); AO3 historicises memory and mourning; AO5 brings critical readings of Gatsby's and Heathcliff's relation to the past.
Gatsby's entire enterprise — the mansion, the parties, the shirts, the accumulated wealth — is machinery built to recover a single lost time: the autumn of 1917, when he first loved Daisy. Fitzgerald gives his nostalgia its defining statement when Nick warns that the past cannot be repeated:
"'Can't repeat the past?' he cried incredulously. 'Why of course you can!'" (The Great Gatsby, Ch. 6)
The "incredulously" is the heart of the tragedy: to Gatsby the very idea that the past is irrecoverable is absurd. His is what one might call a restorative nostalgia — not merely longing for 1917 but attempting to rebuild it, to "fix everything just the way it was before." Yet Fitzgerald shows that the dream depends on distance: the green light is most potent when unreachable across the water, and the moment Gatsby actually has Daisy beside him, the symbol collapses —
"Possibly it had occurred to him that the colossal significance of that light had now vanished forever... His count of enchanted objects had diminished by one." (The Great Gatsby, Ch. 5)
Memory keeps Daisy perfect; reality makes her ordinary. The novel's famous final movement universalises this nostalgic structure of desire into the human condition:
"Gatsby believed in the green light, the orgastic future that year by year recedes before us. It eluded us then, but that's no matter — tomorrow we will run faster, stretch out our arms farther... And one fine morning —
So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past." (The Great Gatsby, Ch. 9)
The paradox of the closing image is exact: we strain forward toward a "future" that is really a past — the current bears us "back ceaselessly," so that aspiration and nostalgia become one motion. Fitzgerald makes Gatsby's doomed attempt to repeat his first love a parable of all human longing.
AO5 — Critical Interpretations: Marius Bewley ("Scott Fitzgerald's Criticism of America," 1954) reads Gatsby's backward-reaching dream as inseparable from the American Dream itself — "the withering of the American dream" — so that his nostalgia is not merely personal but national: a whole culture's belief in a recoverable golden moment. The personal love-nostalgia and the critique of America are, for Bewley, the same thing.
If Gatsby's love is destroyed by the irrecoverable past, Heathcliff's refuses to accept that the beloved is past at all. When Catherine dies, Heathcliff does not mourn and release her; he demands her continued presence, begging to be haunted:
"Be with me always — take any form — drive me mad! only do not leave me in this abyss, where I cannot find you!" (Wuthering Heights, Ch. 16)
"I cannot live without my life! I cannot live without my soul!" (Wuthering Heights, Ch. 16)
The metaphors of identity ("my life," "my soul") mean that for Heathcliff Catherine's death is not loss of a partner but loss of self; he cannot grieve a separate person because she was never separate. His "nostalgia" is therefore monstrous — not a wistful looking-back but an unrelenting refusal of mortality that turns the second half of the novel into a campaign of revenge, and that ends only when he believes himself reunited with her in death. Brontë makes love-beyond-death not consoling but terrifying: the past that will not stay past becomes a haunting.
The plea Heathcliff addresses to the dead Catherine repays close reading, because its very grammar is a refusal of mourning. "Be with me always — take any form — drive me mad!" is a sequence of imperatives directed at the dead, commanding the lost beloved to remain present; mourning, by contrast, is the slow acceptance that the dead are gone, and Heathcliff's imperatives are its exact negation, demands that the past be kept alive by force of will. The desperation of "take any form" — he will accept her as a ghost, a torment, a madness, anything rather than absence — exposes a grief that would rather be haunted than healed, that prefers the pain of an undead memory to the peace of letting go. The final clause, "only do not leave me in this abyss, where I cannot find you," makes the structure of his suffering plain: the unbearable thing is not Catherine's death but his separation from her, the "abyss" of an existence in which he can no longer reach the self she was. Brontë's representation of love-in-memory here is the precise antithesis of the consoling elegy: where elegy mourns and, in mourning, achieves a measure of release, Heathcliff refuses to mourn and is consumed — his memory of Catherine becomes not a treasured keepsake but a wound he will not let close, a haunting he actively summons. This is nostalgia as pathology, the refusal of time turned into a way of life, and it drives the novel's second half precisely because Heathcliff cannot, will not, let the past become past. To analyse the imperative mood of his address to the dead — commanding rather than accepting — is to read the grammar of grief itself, and it is the kind of close-textual AO2 work that distinguishes a top-band answer on memory and loss.
In Tess, memory is the mechanism of doom. Tess's past — the assault at The Chase, the death of her child Sorrow — is the thing she can never put behind her: it returns to destroy her marriage on the wedding night, and Alec returns in person to claim her. Hardy's narrator frames her early violation with a backward, elegiac sorrow, lamenting the irrecoverable wholeness she has lost:
"But, might some say, where was Tess's guardian angel? where was the providence of her simple faith?" (Tess, Phase the First, Ch. 11)
The phase titles themselves enact the impossibility of a fresh start — "Maiden No More" names a state that cannot be reversed. For Tess there is no restorative nostalgia available, no way back to "The Maiden"; the past is a wound that time only deepens, until the only "fulfilment" the social world allows her is the gallows. Where Gatsby chases an idealised past and Heathcliff refuses to release one, Tess is pursued by hers.
The structural device by which Hardy enacts this inescapability is the recurrence — the return, at fatal intervals, of the past Tess cannot leave behind. The assault at The Chase in Phase the First returns to destroy her marriage on the wedding night in Phase the Fifth; Alec himself, whom she believes finished with, returns in person in Phase the Sixth, now grotesquely transformed into a preacher and then back into a seducer, to claim her again. Hardy structures the novel so that the past does not recede but circles back, each return tightening the noose, until the final return — Tess's murder of Alec — is the past breaking through into violence. Even the brief idyll of flight with Angel after the murder is haunted by the knowledge that it cannot last, a stolen present overshadowed by the past that will, within days, deliver Tess to the gallows. The contrast with Gatsby is precise and instructive: Gatsby wills the past to return and is destroyed when it will not; Tess wills the past to stay buried and is destroyed when it will not stay down. The two novels are mirror-images of the same tragic relation to time — one a doomed attempt to recover the past, the other a doomed attempt to escape it — and to set them side by side is to see that nostalgia and trauma are two faces of the same predicament: the refusal of the past to remain past. Heathcliff occupies a third position, neither recovering nor escaping but refusing to release, demanding that the dead past remain present in the form of a haunting. Recovery, escape, refusal: three relations to a past that, in every case, will not stay where it belongs.
Hardy's phase-title "Maiden No More" deserves attention as a verbal monument to this inescapability, because its grammar fixes Tess permanently in a state defined by negation and by the past. "No More" is the language of irreversibility — a maiden no longer, and a maiden never again — and by enshrining that negation as the title of an entire phase, Hardy makes the architecture of his novel deny Tess the fresh start the pastoral recovery at Talbothays seems briefly to offer. However the seasons turn, however the courtship blooms, the title hangs over Tess as the unalterable fact of a past that cannot be undone; the very chapter-headings refuse her the clean slate the social world insists a woman must have to be marriageable. Where Gatsby believes the past can be repeated and Heathcliff believes it must be retained, Hardy's structure insists that for Tess the past simply cannot be revoked — that "Maiden No More" names a door that has closed forever. The novel's bleakest irony is that its own titles, the scaffolding of its form, become instruments of the determinism they describe, sentencing Tess before a single scene of the phase is read.
One of the most sophisticated ways a novelist represents love-in-time is through a symbol that concentrates memory — an object onto which the whole weight of a remembered or longed-for love is loaded — and the green light at the end of Daisy's dock is the supreme instance in the anchor texts. Its first appearance, before we know its meaning, shows Gatsby reaching toward it across the dark water (Ch. 1); only later does Nick understand that the light marks the location of Daisy, and thus of the 1917 love Gatsby has built his life to recover. The light is potent because it is distant: it is the visible sign of a longed-for past rendered as spatial distance, a memory turned into a point of light across the bay. The decisive moment comes when Gatsby finally has Daisy beside him and the symbol collapses:
"Possibly it had occurred to him that the colossal significance of that light had now vanished forever... His count of enchanted objects had diminished by one." (The Great Gatsby, Ch. 5)
The collapse is the novel's profound insight into the structure of nostalgia: the symbol can hold the longed-for past only so long as the past remains unattained. The "colossal significance" of the light was a function of its distance; the moment Daisy is actually present, the light reverts to being a mere green bulb on a dock, its "enchanted" status — the magic memory had invested in it — extinguished. Fitzgerald's narration of the diminished "count of enchanted objects" is exact and devastating: Gatsby's world is a collection of objects enchanted by the memory and the longing he has poured into them, and to attain the longed-for object is to disenchant it. This is why the closing image of the novel returns to the green light as a general symbol of human striving — "the orgastic future that year by year recedes before us" — because Fitzgerald has shown that the light's power lies precisely in its recession, its always being just out of reach. The symbol that holds memory is, in its very nature, a symbol of non-attainment; the moment it is grasped, the memory it held evaporates. Reading the green light as a technology of nostalgia — an object that stores a longed-for past and is destroyed by the past's recovery — is among the richest AO2 analyses the novel permits.
The contrast with how Wuthering Heights and Tess hold memory in objects and places sharpens the point. Brontë's memorial symbol is not a distant light but a threshold — the lattice window of Catherine's old room, at which the ghost-child appears and through which, at the novel's close, Heathcliff's spirit seems to pass to rejoin her. Where Fitzgerald's symbol is destroyed by attainment, Brontë's threshold is the site of an attainment-in-death, the boundary finally crossed; the window holds the memory of the lost love and, at last, becomes the means of reunion with it. Hardy's memorial objects are bleaker still: the phase-title "Maiden No More" is itself a kind of verbal monument to an irrecoverable state, and the recurring figure of Alec is a living symbol of the past that will not die. Three technologies of memory: the light that disenchants on attainment (Gatsby), the threshold that reunites in death (Heathcliff), the verbal and human monuments to an unrecoverable wholeness (Tess). Each novelist finds a different formal vehicle for the relation of love to lost time, and comparing those vehicles is exactly the kind of formal AO2 analysis that lifts a Section C answer.
It is worth distinguishing kinds of nostalgia, because the distinction sharpens analysis. Restorative nostalgia tries to rebuild the lost time and denies that time has passed — Gatsby's literal attempt to recreate 1917. Reflective nostalgia dwells in the longing itself, accepting that the past is gone — closer to the elegiac mood of Hardy's narrator mourning Tess's lost wholeness. Heathcliff's relation to the past fits neither comfortably: it is a refusal of mourning so total that it becomes pathological. Naming these modes lets you argue about how a text positions us toward the past — as dupes of an impossible restoration, as mourners, or as witnesses to an obsession.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.