You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Love in the anchor texts is never a purely private matter — it is always shaped, constrained, and frequently destroyed by social convention. Class barriers, sexual morality, religious norms, and the expectations of family and community determine what kinds of love are permissible and what kinds are punished. Transgressive love — love that crosses a boundary society treats as absolute — is the engine of all three novels: Heathcliff and Catherine across a class line, Tess across the line of the "pure" woman, Gatsby across the gulf between new and old money. This lesson examines how the novels represent that transgression and its consequences, and how the love poetry of the anthology stages forbidden or socially defiant love in its own form.
Spec Mapping — Paper 1, Section C: prose (Love Through the Ages comparison). The dominant AOs here are AO3 (the historically specific moral codes — Victorian sexual morality and the "fallen woman," class as caste, the American class myth — that define transgression) and AO2 (how narrative method makes us feel the transgression and judge it). AO1 supplies terminology (transgression, the double standard, the fallen woman, caste); AO4 connects the novel's forbidden loves to poems of illicit or boundary-crossing desire; AO5 brings Marxist and feminist criticism to bear on who is punished and why.
Class is the most pervasive social barrier to love in the anchor texts, and Wuthering Heights dramatises it most starkly. Heathcliff is a foundling, raised beside Catherine but never accepted as her social equal, and Catherine's choice of Edgar Linton over him is openly, agonisingly, a class choice:
"It would degrade me to marry Heathcliff now; so he shall never know how I love him." (Wuthering Heights, Ch. 9)
The verb "degrade" exposes the calculus exactly: marriage to Heathcliff would lower Catherine's social grade. The tragedy is that she perceives the social construction of her choice — she does not deny that she loves him; she ranks the loss of status above the loss of love — yet cannot escape it. Brontë sharpens the irony by placing this speech where Heathcliff overhears only its first half and flees before the avowal that follows, so that the class-bound decision and the absolute love are split apart by the very social structure the scene anatomises.
AO5 — Critical Interpretations: Terry Eagleton, in Myths of Power: A Marxist Study of the Brontës (1975), reads Heathcliff and Catherine's bond as a pre-social, "natural" relation crushed by a class system that demands property and respectability; Heathcliff's later accumulation of wealth and land is his attempt to beat that system on its own terms, and it hollows him out. More broadly, Marxist criticism reads the marriage plot of nineteenth-century fiction as a mechanism for transmitting capital and status — so that "who may love whom" is always also "how property moves."
The Great Gatsby transposes the same barrier to 1920s America, where the line runs not between titled and untitled but between old money (Daisy, the Buchanans, East Egg) and new money (Gatsby, West Egg). Gatsby's enormous, criminally-funded wealth cannot buy him across it; Daisy finally "retreats back into" her class:
"They were careless people, Tom and Daisy — they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness." (The Great Gatsby, Ch. 9)
Nick's indictment names the mechanism: money is not merely what the Buchanans have but where they retreat — a fortified position that absorbs the damage they do and excludes the outsider who loves into it. The American Dream's promise of self-reinvention founders on a class system as rigid, in its way, as Brontë's Yorkshire.
It is worth pressing on the precise wording of Catherine's "degrade" speech, because Brontë's diction does analytical work. The verb "degrade" is etymologically a matter of grade or step — to degrade is to be lowered a rung — so that Catherine's word makes literal the vertical social ladder on which marriage to Heathcliff would be a descent. The phrase "now" is equally loaded: "it would degrade me to marry Heathcliff now" registers that the degradation is historically contingent, a function of Heathcliff's present social position (a servant, debased by Hindley) rather than of his worth — and it is exactly this "now" that the returned, wealthy Heathcliff of the second half tries to reverse. Brontë's structural masterstroke is to have Heathcliff overhear only this first, class-bound clause and flee before the avowal that follows ("Whatever our souls are made of, his and mine are the same"), so that the social calculation and the metaphysical love are physically severed by the act of overhearing. The class system, in other words, does not merely constrain the love from outside; it interrupts the very speech in which the love is declared, cutting the avowal in half and sending Heathcliff into the storm before he can hear that he is loved. The transgression is thus defeated not by external prohibition alone but by the way the social order penetrates and fractures the intimate scene of confession — a far subtler dramatisation of class-as-barrier than any direct ban could achieve.
In Tess the transgressed boundary is sexual, and Hardy's critique of the double standard — the code that punished women for what men did with impunity — is the bitterest in the anchor texts. The horror of Tess's fate is that she is punished for a transgression done to her: the assault at The Chase in Phase the First makes her, in the eyes of her world, a "fallen woman," and Hardy's narrator intervenes to indict not Tess but the cosmos and the creed that have abandoned her:
"But, might some say, where was Tess's guardian angel? where was the providence of her simple faith?" (Tess, Phase the First, Ch. 11)
The whole provocation of the book is condensed in its subtitle, A Pure Woman Faithfully Presented by Thomas Hardy — a claim of purity deliberately attached to a woman society would call ruined. The double standard becomes unbearably explicit on the wedding night, when Angel — who has just confessed his own sexual past and been forgiven — cannot forgive Tess hers:
"'Forgiveness does not apply to the case. You were one person; now you are another.'" (Tess, Phase the Fifth, Ch. 35)
Angel's logic ("one person... another") reveals that he loved an ideal — the "fresh and virginal daughter of Nature" he had named her — and that the transgression he cannot pardon is the collision of that ideal with a real, sexual history. The same act is venial in the man and damning in the woman; Hardy makes the asymmetry the source of the tragedy.
AO3 — Context: Victorian sexual ideology divided women into the "pure" and the "fallen," with no path back across the line; a woman's reputation was her social existence. The figure of the fallen woman was everywhere in the period's culture, usually as a cautionary spectacle. Hardy's intervention — insisting on Tess's purity, blaming the system rather than the victim — was genuinely transgressive, and the hostile reception confirms it. He published Tess in 1891 only after serial bowdlerisation, and reviewers were scandalised by the subtitle's claim.
AO5 — Critical Interpretations: Penny Boumelha situates Tess within Hardy's troubled engagement with the sexual politics of his age, reading the narrator's defence of Tess as both genuinely radical and compromised by an objectifying gaze. A feminist reading thus finds Hardy attacking the double standard while remaining partly inside the very structures of looking that sustain it.
What makes the anchor texts a study of transgression rather than merely of love is that each tracks the consequences of crossing a social line — and the punishments are instructive, because they reveal what each society most fears. In Tess, the punishment is total: the woman who transgressed the code of purity (though the transgression was done to her) is hanged, and Hardy's narrator frames the execution as cosmic cruelty dressed as law:
"'Justice' was done, and the President of the Immortals (in Aeschylean phrase) had ended his sport with Tess." (Tess, Phase the Seventh, Ch. 59)
The inverted commas around "Justice" are the bitterest stroke in the anchor texts: with one typographical gesture Hardy disowns the very word society uses to legitimise its destruction of the transgressor. In Wuthering Heights, the punishment of Catherine's transgression (loving across class, then betraying that love for status) is a kind of eternal exclusion — the ghost-child at the window, locked out of the home she forfeited:
"'Let me in — let me in!'... 'I'm come home: I'd lost my way on the moor!'" (Wuthering Heights, Ch. 3)
Catherine is punished not by the law but by a haunted homelessness, condemned to long forever across a threshold for the belonging she traded away. In Gatsby, the transgressor who dared to love into the closed world of old money is punished by death and erasure — shot in his own pool, his funeral all but unattended, while the Buchanans "retreat back into their money." Reading the form of each punishment is a sophisticated move: hanging (the law's violence), haunting (the soul's exile), erasure (the indifference of the privileged) — each punishment is tailored to the society that imposes it, and so each reveals what that society holds sacred.
The most sophisticated analytical move is to examine how each novelist positions the reader toward the transgression, because the narrative method itself is an argument about how we should judge.
| Text | Transgression | How the method positions us |
|---|---|---|
| Tess | A sexually "fallen" woman | Hardy's sympathetic omniscient narrator and direct rhetorical intervention demand that we reject society's verdict and pity, even revere, Tess |
| Wuthering Heights | Love across a class line, and Heathcliff's later cruelty | Brontë's mediated narration withholds easy judgement, drawing us into sympathy for a love so intense it overrides our moral reservations |
| The Great Gatsby | An outsider loving into the closed world of old money | Nick's admiring-yet-critical narration makes us complicit in romanticising Gatsby even as it exposes the corruption funding his dream |
In each case the consequences of transgression reveal the society depicted: Tess's execution exposes a moral order that destroys its victims; Heathcliff's hollow triumph exposes a class system that corrupts even those who beat it; Gatsby's murder and Daisy's retreat expose an America whose promise of mobility is a lie.
The most morally complex treatment of transgression in the anchor texts is Brontë's, because Heathcliff does not remain the victim of social convention but turns into its most ruthless enforcer. The novel's first half presents him as the wronged outsider — a foundling denied Catherine by a class system that deems marriage to him a "degradation." But the second half presents the same man, returned wealthy and vengeful, deploying the very mechanisms of property, marriage and inheritance that excluded him to dispossess and degrade the next generation. He marries Isabella Linton not from love but to seize the Grange; he engineers the marriage of his sickly son to the younger Cathy to absorb her inheritance; he reduces Hareton Earnshaw — the rightful heir of the Heights — to an illiterate servant, repeating upon Hareton the exact humiliation once inflicted on himself. Brontë's characterisation here is an argument about transgression and power: the outsider who suffered under the class system does not abolish it when he gains the means but masters it, becoming a more efficient tyrant than those who excluded him. This is precisely the reading Eagleton develops — that Heathcliff "beats the system on its own terms" and is hollowed out by the victory. The transgressive love that began as a pure refusal of social convention ends as the cynical manipulation of convention's cruelest instruments. The analytical payoff is large: it means Wuthering Heights cannot be read as a simple celebration of transgressive love against a wicked society, because the transgressor himself becomes the agent of social cruelty. Brontë's transgression is dialectical — the system produces the rebel, and the rebel reproduces the system.
AO5 — Critical Interpretations: Q. D. Leavis ("A Fresh Approach to Wuthering Heights," 1969) cautions against romanticising Heathcliff, insisting that the novel's social realism — its sharp registration of property, inheritance and class cruelty — is as essential as its mythic intensity, and that Heathcliff's later tyranny must be read as seriously as his early suffering. Set beside Eagleton's Marxist reading, Leavis's emphasis on the qualified, distanced presentation of the central passion provides a powerful corrective to the sentimental tradition that treats Catherine and Heathcliff's love as an unequivocal ideal. To hold the two readings together — the transcendent passion and the social tyranny it fuels — is to read the transgression at the level the top band rewards.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.