You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Romantic love is the central thematic concern of Paper 1 Section A, and Shakespeare explores it with extraordinary range and complexity across the set plays. This lesson examines how Shakespeare dramatises the experience of falling in love, declarations of love, courtship conventions, and the relationship between romantic love and other forces — power, family, society, and selfhood. Understanding these patterns across all four plays will enable you to write comparatively and analytically, demonstrating the breadth of knowledge examiners reward.
Paper 1, Section A: Shakespeare (AQA 7712). Set text: Othello, with reference to Measure for Measure, The Winter's Tale and The Taming of the Shrew.
AO Focus in this lesson Weight here AO1 A thesis-driven argument about how Shakespeare conceives romantic love; the vocabulary of courtly love, Petrarchism, blazon Strong AO2 How language and form construct declarations, courtship and the failure of love-language Strong AO3 Petrarchan/courtly-love conventions; companionate marriage; the active heroine against the passive Petrarchan beloved Developed AO5 Disputed silences (Isabella) and disputed declarations (Katherine) Developed Section A assesses AO1, AO2, AO3 and AO5 (not AO4). This is a thematic lesson, so AO1 — the construction of a personal, conceptualised argument about love — carries unusual weight, but every claim must be earned through close reading (AO2).
A warning before we begin: "love" tempts candidates into sentimentality and into treating characters as real lovers whose feelings we can simply intuit. The discipline of this lesson is to treat romantic love as something Shakespeare constructs — through convention, language and dramatic structure — and very often interrogates rather than celebrates.
Shakespeare inherits the literary convention of love at first sight from Petrarchan and courtly love traditions but subjects it to dramatic scrutiny.
Unusually for Shakespeare, the audience does not witness Othello and Desdemona falling in love. Their courtship has already happened when the play begins, and we learn about it retrospectively through Othello's account to the Senate:
"She loved me for the dangers I had passed,
And I loved her that she did pity them." (Othello, 1.3.168–69)
This is a remarkably symmetrical account of mutual attraction — love based on storytelling and empathy rather than physical beauty. Desdemona fell in love with Othello's narrative of himself, which is precisely the narrative Iago will destroy.
AO3 — Context: In Elizabethan England, a woman choosing her own husband — especially across racial lines — was transgressive. Desdemona's elopement defies her father Brabantio and the social norms of Venice. Shakespeare presents this defiance sympathetically, but the play also shows its consequences.
Florizel's love for Perdita is presented through pastoral convention — the prince disguised as a shepherd, the princess disguised as a shepherdess (though she does not know her own identity). Their love is characterised by imagery of natural growth and seasonal renewal:
"When you do dance, I wish you
A wave o' th' sea, that you might ever do
Nothing but that; move still, still so,
And own no other function." (4.4.140–43)
The image of Perdita as an ocean wave — beautiful, natural, perpetually in motion — is one of Shakespeare's most striking. It connects their love with the play's larger themes of nature, time, and renewal.
Angelo's desire for Isabella is explicitly not romantic love — it is lust triggered by her virtue:
"Is this her fault or mine?
The tempter or the tempted, who sins most?" (2.2.167–68)
Shakespeare presents Angelo's desire as a dark parody of love at first sight. Where conventional love at first sight ennobles the lover, Angelo's desire corrupts him. The play interrogates the relationship between desire and power, asking what happens when sexual attraction is backed by political authority.
Petruchio's initial motivation is explicitly financial:
"I come to wive it wealthily in Padua;
If wealthily, then happily in Padua." (1.2.74–75)
Yet their first meeting (2.1) crackles with verbal energy and intellectual equality. Whether this wit-combat constitutes genuine attraction is one of the play's central ambiguities. The rapid-fire stichomythia (alternating single lines of dialogue) creates a rhythm of challenge and response that some critics read as erotic:
KATHERINE: "Asses are made to bear, and so are you."
PETRUCHIO: "Women are made to bear, and so are you." (2.1.199–200)
The sexual double entendre is characteristic of Shakespearean courtship — verbal sparring that is simultaneously aggressive and intimate.
How characters declare their love reveals both individual psychology and broader cultural assumptions about gender, power, and sincerity.
| Play | Declaration | Analysis |
|---|---|---|
| Othello | Othello's speech to the Senate (1.3) | A public declaration that presents love as mutual respect and shared experience — eloquent, dignified, but also a narrative that can be attacked |
| The Taming of the Shrew | Kate's final speech (5.2) | A "declaration" of wifely love and submission — but its sincerity is endlessly debatable; the formal rhetoric may signal genuine feeling, ironic performance, or coerced compliance |
| Measure for Measure | There is no straightforward love declaration | The play is remarkably resistant to romantic convention; the Duke's proposal to Isabella (5.1) is met with silence — one of the most discussed silences in Shakespeare |
| The Winter's Tale | Florizel's pledge to Perdita (4.4.35–51) | An idealised declaration that echoes the conventions of pastoral romance, contrasting sharply with Leontes' destructive jealousy |
AO5 — Critical Interpretations: Isabella's silence at the Duke's proposal in Measure for Measure has generated enormous critical debate. Some directors have Isabella accept joyfully; others have her refuse or walk away in silence. The text provides no stage direction. Harriett Hawkins argues that the silence is Shakespeare's deliberate refusal to impose a comic resolution on a character whose autonomy the play has fought to establish.
Shakespeare both uses and subverts the courtship conventions of his era:
The blazon — a poetic catalogue of the beloved's physical beauties — is a Petrarchan convention that Shakespeare deploys with varying degrees of sincerity:
The influence of Shakespeare's own sonnets permeates the plays. The language of the sonnets — with their themes of beauty, time, desire, and the inadequacy of language to capture experience — provides a poetic vocabulary that the dramatic characters inherit.
AO3 — Context: The Petrarchan tradition idealised the beloved as distant and unattainable — a cold, beautiful statue to be adored from afar. Shakespeare repeatedly challenges this convention, creating women who speak, argue, desire, and act. Desdemona's active choice of Othello, Katherine's verbal combativeness, Isabella's fierce defence of her chastity, and Hermione's dignified self-defence all resist the Petrarchan model of the silent, passive beloved.
One of Shakespeare's most persistent concerns is the relationship between love and language — the extent to which love can be spoken, the gap between what is felt and what is said.
One of Shakespeare's recurring paradoxes is the idea that the deepest love cannot be adequately spoken — that language fails at the precise point where feeling is greatest. Juliet articulates this directly in Romeo and Juliet:
"They are but beggars that can count their worth,
But my true love is grown to such excess
I cannot sum up sum of half my wealth." (Romeo and Juliet, 2.6.32–34)
The financial metaphor — love as wealth too vast to count — turns inadequacy into a measure of intensity. Across the set plays, Shakespeare returns repeatedly to this idea that genuine love exceeds language:
Conversely, some characters' love is only language — rhetorical performance without emotional substance:
Shakespeare never presents romantic love in isolation. It always exists in tension with other loyalties and other forms of love:
| Type of Love | Example | Tension |
|---|---|---|
| Familial love | Brabantio and Desdemona (Othello); Leontes, Hermione, and Mamillius (The Winter's Tale) | Romantic love disrupts family bonds; children suffer for parents' romantic failures |
| Friendship | Othello and Cassio; Leontes and Polixenes | Male friendship is threatened or destroyed by romantic jealousy |
| Self-love | Angelo's self-regard (Measure for Measure); Petruchio's self-interest (The Taming of the Shrew) | The question of whether love can coexist with selfishness |
| Divine love | Isabella's religious vocation (Measure for Measure) | Sacred and secular love as competing claims on the self |
Exam Tip: A strong Paper 1 response will explore how Shakespeare complicates romantic love by setting it against other loyalties and desires. The richest analysis comes from examining these tensions, not from treating love as a simple emotion that characters either have or lack.
When writing about Shakespeare's treatment of romantic love:
Return to the foundational account of Othello and Desdemona's love:
"She loved me for the dangers I had passed,
And I loved her that she did pity them." (Othello, 1.3.168–69)
The most analytically productive observation here is that this love is built on storytelling. Desdemona did not fall for Othello's body or his rank but for his "dangers" — for the narrative of himself that he performed in Brabantio's house. Othello, reciprocally, loves her for her response to that narrative: "that she did pity them." Their love is, structurally, an exchange of narration and reception. This matters enormously for the tragedy, because a love grounded in a story can be undermined by a counter-story — and that is exactly Iago's method. He does not need to alter Desdemona's behaviour; he needs only to supply Othello with a rival narrative ("ocular proof," the handkerchief, Cassio's dream) that competes with the one their love was built on. The verb "pity," too, repays attention: it is not the language of equal desire but of compassion, and a love founded on pity carries within it an asymmetry that Iago can exploit — the suggestion, which he plants, that Desdemona's choice was unnatural and therefore unstable. The line that establishes their love also encodes its vulnerability.
Exam Tip: When analysing a declaration of love, do not ask only "is it sincere?" Ask "what does this love rest on — beauty, narrative, virtue, wealth, pity — and what does that foundation make possible or impossible later in the play?" Love in Shakespeare always has a structure, and the structure has consequences.
A recurring danger in Shakespeare's romantic love is idealisation — the lover's tendency to construct the beloved as a perfect, almost sacred figure rather than a real person. Idealisation is the inheritance of the Petrarchan and courtly-love traditions, in which the beloved is a remote, flawless object of devotion. But Shakespeare repeatedly shows idealisation curdling into something dangerous, because a beloved who has been placed on a pedestal can be cast down with terrible violence when she fails to match the ideal.
Othello's love for Desdemona has a strong idealising strain. He speaks of her in absolute terms — she becomes, in his imagination, the guarantor of order itself, so that her supposed fall threatens to plunge the whole world into chaos. This is the psychology behind his cry that "Chaos is come again" (3.3.92) at the very moment Iago begins his work: Desdemona's love has become the thing that holds his cosmos together, and the idea of her betrayal is therefore unbearable not merely as personal grief but as metaphysical collapse. The higher the idealisation, the further the fall — and Iago understands this perfectly. He does not attack Desdemona's behaviour so much as Othello's image of her, knowing that an idealised love is brittle precisely because it cannot accommodate ordinary human imperfection, let alone fabricated guilt.
The same pattern, redirected, drives Angelo in Measure for Measure. His desire for Isabella is triggered by her virtue — he is corrupted not by a temptress but by goodness itself, which his self-knowledge recognises: the soliloquy in which he asks whether the fault is his or hers turns precisely on the perversity of desiring the thing one ought to revere. Idealisation and desire become indistinguishable, and the result is the abuse of power.
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.