You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
More than a century after the Armistice, writers continue to return to the First World War. This might seem surprising — every participant is now dead, every eyewitness account is written, every archive has been combed. And yet the flow of WW1 literature shows no sign of diminishing. Novels, poems, and plays about the Great War continue to appear, often to critical acclaim and commercial success. This lesson examines why — and how — post-2000 writers revisit the conflict, and what this most recent literature contributes to the "Aftermath" dimension of the option.
This is Paper 2 of AQA A-Level English Literature A (7712), Texts in Shared Contexts, Option 2A: WW1 and its Aftermath. Post-2000 literature belongs squarely to the "Aftermath" emphasis: it is the war remembered, reconstructed, and reinterpreted from the vantage of the present. The objectives, with their typical weighting for this material:
| Assessment Objective | What it rewards | Relevance to this lesson |
|---|---|---|
| AO1 | Coherent, terminologically precise argument | Handling the contemporary novel, verse drama, and elegy with accuracy |
| AO2 | Analysis of how meaning is shaped by language, form, structure | Sheers's earth-imagery and line-breaks; the dual time-frame; the verse-drama form of Pink Mist |
| AO3 (strongly in play) | The significance and influence of contexts of production and reception | The centenary, the end of living memory, post-colonial and feminist recovery, modern war as a lens |
| AO4 | Connections across literary texts | Post-2000 writers in dialogue with Owen, Sassoon, and the inter-war prose |
| AO5 (strongly in play) | Different interpretations, including the authenticity debate | Whether writers a century removed can write the war "authentically"; the risk of sentimentality |
AO3 and AO5 carry particular weight because the defining fact about post-2000 literature is its distance from the event and its consequent self-consciousness about the act of remembrance. These writers know they are inheritors, not witnesses; many foreground that condition (the descendant searching the archive, the modern war held up as a mirror). A candidate who treats Barry or Sheers as if they were eyewitnesses misses the point: their subject is partly memory itself — how a culture holds, transmits, and reshapes a war it can no longer remember first-hand.
Quotation caution (post-2000, in-copyright): Every text in this lesson is firmly in copyright, and study materials have circulated inaccurate transcriptions of contemporary poems. This lesson therefore analyses these works through their scenes, structures, images, and methods, quoting only short phrases that can be verified. When you study a set text, check every quotation against the printed page; a precise paraphrase of technique is far safer — and scores better — than a fabricated line.
| Reason | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Unfinished emotional business | The scale of the war's trauma means that its emotional legacy has been transmitted across generations. Many contemporary writers are the grandchildren or great-grandchildren of veterans; they inherit the silences and scars of family history |
| New perspectives | Contemporary writers bring perspectives that the original war writers could not: post-colonial analysis of empire, feminist analysis of gender, modern understanding of PTSD, the Irish experience, the contribution of soldiers from the colonies |
| The end of living memory | The last British combat veteran, Harry Patch, died in 2009. The passing of living memory creates an urgency to preserve and reimagine the experience before it is lost entirely |
| Continuing relevance | The questions the war raised — about the morality of conflict, the relationship between the individual and the state, the gap between official narrative and lived reality — remain relevant in an era of Iraq, Afghanistan, and ongoing global conflict |
| The power of the material | The First World War provides literary material of extraordinary dramatic and emotional power: extreme situations, moral dilemmas, the collision of individual humanity with industrial killing |
Barker returned to WW1 after the Regeneration trilogy with two novels that approach the war through the lens of art.
| Feature | Analysis |
|---|---|
| Setting | Begins at the Slade School of Art in 1914; moves to Belgium during the war. The protagonist, Paul Tarrant, is an art student who becomes a medical orderly |
| Art and war | The novel asks how art can respond to the reality of war. Can the techniques of drawing and painting — designed to represent the human body in its beauty — cope with the mutilated, destroyed bodies of the battlefield? |
| The Slade | The pre-war art world is depicted as a space of aesthetic preoccupation and sexual freedom, soon to be shattered by the conflict. The contrast between the life class (studying the nude body) and the battlefield (destroying the body) is the novel's central irony |
| Gender and art | The novel includes female art students who, like the women in Barker's earlier work, must negotiate a world structured by male power and male violence |
| Feature | Analysis |
|---|---|
| Subject | Elinor Brooke searches for the truth about her brother Toby's death on the Western Front. The novel explores facial reconstruction surgery — the work of pioneering surgeon Harold Gillies, who treated soldiers with devastating facial wounds |
| The face | The destruction of the face is, in Barker's treatment, the ultimate horror of the war: the obliteration of identity, of expression, of the human. The surgeons who attempt to reconstruct faces are, in a sense, doing the same work as the novelists: trying to make the human recognisable again |
| Art as reconstruction | Artists were employed to make portrait masks for soldiers whose faces could not be surgically repaired. The novel sees this as a metaphor for the artist's role in relation to trauma: creating a surface that allows the wounded to face the world |
| Feature | Analysis |
|---|---|
| Perspective | The novel tells the story of Willie Dunne, a young Irishman who enlists in the Royal Dublin Fusiliers. This is a perspective rarely represented in English-language war literature: the Irish soldier fighting in the British Army |
| Historical context | Willie's service coincides with the Easter Rising of 1916. He is fighting for the British Empire abroad while his countrymen are fighting against it at home. This dual loyalty — or dual betrayal — is the novel's central tension |
| The Irish experience | Approximately 210,000 Irishmen served in the British forces during WW1; approximately 35,000 were killed. After Irish independence, their service was deliberately forgotten — they were seen as traitors to the nationalist cause. Barry's novel is an act of recovery, restoring these men to memory |
| Language | Barry's prose is lyrical, rhythmic, and deeply influenced by Irish speech patterns. The beauty of the language creates a painful contrast with the brutality of the events it describes |
| AO3 significance | The novel challenges the Anglo-centric focus of most WW1 literature, reminding us that the war was an imperial conflict in which soldiers from colonised nations fought and died for an empire that often denied them equal citizenship |
| Feature | Analysis |
|---|---|
| Structure | Set in the five days leading up to the burial of the Unknown Warrior at Westminster Abbey on 11 November 1920. The novel follows three women whose lives have been shaped by the war |
| The Unknown Warrior | The central symbol: a single unidentified body, chosen from the battlefields, brought to London, and buried with full honours. The Unknown Warrior represents all the dead — and the impossibility of individual mourning on the scale the war demanded |
| Three women | Hettie (a dance-hall worker), Evelyn (who lost her brother), and Ada (who lost her son). Each woman's story explores a different aspect of the war's aftermath: trauma, grief, and the search for meaning |
| The home front | Like Brittain, Hope centres the experience of women — those who waited, mourned, and rebuilt. The novel insists that the war's damage was not confined to the trenches |
| Commemoration | The novel interrogates the rituals of commemoration: Do they help or hinder grief? Can a public ceremony address private loss? Is the Unknown Warrior a consolation or an evasion? |
Hope's choice of the Unknown Warrior as her structuring symbol is itself a sophisticated piece of design worth analysing. The single anonymous body, selected from the battlefields and buried with national honours in Westminster Abbey, was conceived precisely because the scale of loss had made individual mourning impossible — most of the dead had no known grave, and the Warrior stands in for all of them. Wake exploits the resulting paradox: the most public, most ceremonial body in the nation is also the most unknown, and around its journey to London Hope arranges three private griefs that the official rite can neither name nor satisfy. The novel thereby restages, for a twenty-first-century readership, the aftermath's founding anxiety — that commemoration may comfort the nation while leaving the individual mourner alone — and it does so by centring, as Brittain did, the women who waited and grieved rather than the men who fought. Reading Wake against Mew's "The Cenotaph" reveals a continuity across nearly a century: both works set the empty, representative monument against the irreducibly particular wound, and both ask whether the one can ever answer the other.
Sheers is a Welsh poet and novelist whose work engages with both world wars and contemporary conflict.
The poem describes the discovery, over many years, of a mass grave of Welsh soldiers killed at Mametz Wood during the Battle of the Somme (July 1916). Its governing situation is that the farmers working the land find the bodies turning up year after year under their ploughs as they restore the battlefield to cultivation — the earth slowly giving back its dead.
Quotation note (corrected): Earlier teaching materials circulated the poem's opening tercet with an inaccurate third line ("as they worked the land back to itself again"). That wording is not reliable, so the opening is paraphrased above rather than quoted. The short phrases analysed below — "the wasted young," "a broken mosaic of bone," "their absent tongues" — are widely cited from the poem, but for a post-2000 in-copyright text you should verify every line against your set edition before quoting it in the exam.
| Feature | Analysis |
|---|---|
| The earth gives up its dead | The central image: the land literally returns the bodies of the soldiers, years after the battle, as the farmers plough. The earth has not forgotten, even when the living have — a haunting image of memory residing in the ground itself, beyond human control |
| The squandered young | Sheers's phrase for the dead carries a double sense — bodies physically ruined, and lives wantonly thrown away. The economy of the image fuses the literal corpse with a moral judgement on the waste of the offensive |
| The fragmented body | The recovered bones are figured as a broken mosaic — a once-whole artwork now in pieces that can never be fully reassembled. The image insists on the irreparability of the loss: reconstruction is impossible, only fragments remain |
| The silenced dead | The dead cannot speak; their tongues are "absent." The poem speaks for them while simultaneously acknowledging the limit of that speaking — the dead remain beyond the full reach of language, a recurring anxiety in aftermath writing about whether the living can ever truly voice the dead |
| Welsh perspective | Sheers writes as a Welsh poet about Welsh soldiers; the 38th (Welsh) Division suffered devastating casualties at Mametz Wood. The poem is an act of national as well as individual remembrance, recovering a specifically Welsh memory of the Somme |
| Feature | Analysis |
|---|---|
| Subject | Three young men from Bristol who serve in Afghanistan. Although not about WW1, the work draws explicit parallels between modern and historical conflict |
| Form | A verse drama — a play written entirely in poetry. The form echoes the war poets, suggesting continuity between the conflicts |
| "Pink mist" | Military slang for what remains when a body is hit by an explosive device. The euphemism — beautiful, poetic — masks a horrific reality |
| Connection to WW1 | The parallels are deliberate: young men sent to fight in a conflict they do not fully understand, returning (or not) to a society that cannot comprehend their experience. The echoes of Owen and Sassoon are unmistakable |
The centenary of the First World War produced an extraordinary volume of literary and cultural activity:
| Type | Examples |
|---|---|
| New fiction | Louisa Young, My Dear, I Wanted to Tell You (2011); Frances Hardinge, Fly by Night (2014 anniversary edition); Kate Atkinson, Life After Life (2013) |
| Poetry | Carol Ann Duffy, The Bees (2011) includes WW1 poems; anthologies of new war poetry commissioned for the centenary |
| Theatre | New productions of Journey's End and Oh! What a Lovely War; new plays exploring underrepresented perspectives |
| Public art | Paul Cummins and Tom Piper, Blood Swept Lands and Seas of Red (2014) — 888,246 ceramic poppies installed at the Tower of London, one for each British military fatality. The installation was seen by over five million people |
| Academic activity | Major research projects, conferences, and publications re-examining every aspect of the war |
Subscribe to continue reading
Get full access to this lesson and all 10 lessons in this course.